National News
Viewing comments for:
Meltdown 101: Why Did the AIG Bailout Get Bigger?
National News November 12, 2008
It's a $150 billion gamble.
That's the size of the newly enlarged financial lifeline the U.S. government threw tottering insurance giant American International Group on Monday, expanding an aid ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: A Gamble, How is it a gamble when we've already lost? | Ralph | Nov 17, 2008, 3:04 pm |
| A Gamble, How is it a gamble when we've already lost? | Sheltowee | Nov 17, 2008, 2:06 pm |
| RE: CDS | Bang | Nov 17, 2008, 12:54 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Buckeye | Nov 17, 2008, 11:28 am |
| RE: too big -party time | Nov 16, 2008, 4:04 pm |
|
| too big -party time | Voice | Nov 16, 2008, 11:28 am |
| CDS | Zephyr | Nov 13, 2008, 3:23 pm |
| RE: CDS | Ratemaker | Nov 13, 2008, 3:10 pm |
| CDS | Zephyr | Nov 13, 2008, 2:35 pm |
| RE: CDS | Ratemaker | Nov 13, 2008, 2:31 pm |
| RE: RE: CDS | InsIsMyPassion | Nov 13, 2008, 2:30 pm |
| RE: CDS | morrison | Nov 13, 2008, 2:18 pm |
| CDS | Zephyr | Nov 13, 2008, 2:15 pm |
| RE: AIG's effect on the rest of the insurance market | Doctor J | Nov 13, 2008, 12:41 pm |
| Unless they sell off assets... | Doctor J | Nov 13, 2008, 12:39 pm |
| Hey Dum Dum - Lets make it real simple for you | Jeff | Nov 13, 2008, 8:29 am |
| RE: AIG's effect on the rest of the insurance market | morrison | Nov 13, 2008, 8:25 am |
| AIG's effect on the rest of the insurance market | Homer | Nov 13, 2008, 8:20 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Scott | Nov 13, 2008, 7:37 am |
| RE: Wasting time | red handed | Nov 12, 2008, 9:00 pm |
| Wasting time | Sam | Nov 12, 2008, 8:54 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | the idiots | Nov 12, 2008, 6:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | dum dum | Nov 12, 2008, 6:31 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | the idiots | Nov 12, 2008, 5:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | dum dum | Nov 12, 2008, 5:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | dum dum | Nov 12, 2008, 5:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | the idiots | Nov 12, 2008, 5:25 pm |
| Great Observation, IJ | mvp@123.com | Nov 12, 2008, 4:49 pm |
| RE: RE: Party Time | Baxtor | Nov 12, 2008, 4:47 pm |
| RE: Too big to fail! | Enough already Bill | Nov 12, 2008, 4:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Fed Up with AIG | Nov 12, 2008, 3:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | bart | Nov 12, 2008, 3:52 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Ralph | Nov 12, 2008, 3:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Party Time | dum dum | Nov 12, 2008, 3:42 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | jim morrison | Nov 12, 2008, 3:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | dum dum | Nov 12, 2008, 3:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Party Time | the idiots | Nov 12, 2008, 3:26 pm |
| RE: RE: dum-dum | Left around to the Right | Nov 12, 2008, 3:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Fed Up with AIG | Nov 12, 2008, 3:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Jennifer | Nov 12, 2008, 3:12 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Jennifer | Nov 12, 2008, 3:12 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | Cranky | Nov 12, 2008, 3:11 pm |
| RE: RE: the AIG Bailout | jim morrison | Nov 12, 2008, 2:50 pm |
| RE: the AIG Bailout | barb wired | Nov 12, 2008, 2:01 pm |
| RE: Bailout | Tar | Nov 12, 2008, 1:11 pm |
| RE: dum-dum | B Obama | Nov 12, 2008, 1:03 pm |
| Good money after bad | one | Nov 12, 2008, 1:00 pm |
| dum-dum | Ralph | Nov 12, 2008, 12:45 pm |
| RE: RE: Party Time | bart | Nov 12, 2008, 12:45 pm |
| RE: RE: Party Time | Scott | Nov 12, 2008, 12:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Too big to fail!-Ralph | LOL | Nov 12, 2008, 12:36 pm |
| RE: Party Time | dum dum | Nov 12, 2008, 12:32 pm |
| RE: Too big to fail! | Ralph | Nov 12, 2008, 12:31 pm |
| Too big to fail! | Bill | Nov 12, 2008, 12:28 pm |
| Party Time | Mr. Big | Nov 12, 2008, 10:34 am |
| Bailout | Scott | Nov 12, 2008, 10:09 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: Great Observation, IJ
"It's a $150 billion gamble"
and
"The Fed doesn't believe it will suffer losses because it is hopeful the market for such distressed investments will recover "
We switched from all Fed funds to part Fed, part Treasury funds, lowered the interest rate, & lengthened the term of the loan.
But, when all is said and done, what we truly did was double down on our bet that housing prices will recover. The problem is, peak values were a direct result of exotic mortgage programs, no-doc loans, & allowing neg. amortization through "Pay Option ("pick-a-pay") ARMs" and interest-only loans. People on $50,000 incomes were in $500,000 houses. People on $80,000 incomes were in $800,000 houses. The market will never and more importantly should never return to such ridiculously inflated values.
I think in many years when we look back on this, we will find major problems in 1) the undying assumption that housing prices always go up, and 2) valuations Treasury & Fed puts on the assets they're buying--in some cases they're paying 50 cents on the dollar for assets which were marked by other banks at 10 cents on the dollar -- this is a gift, not a bail out.