National News
Viewing comments for:
Insurers Urged to Check Business Process Patents After Bilski Ruling
National News November 18, 2008
A recent federal court ruling could jeopardize the way some insurance, banking and high technology companies protect their business methods through patents.
The United States Court of Appeals for ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Patenting Business Methods in the Age of Bilski | Anne Nonymous | Nov 25, 2008, 8:37 am |
| Patenting Business Methods in the Age of Bilski | Mark Nowotarski | Nov 25, 2008, 8:31 am |
| Inscopywriter's comments to Wudchuck | Anne Nonymous | Nov 19, 2008, 8:25 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: patent | wudchuck | Nov 18, 2008, 2:01 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: patent | inscopywriter | Nov 18, 2008, 1:39 pm |
| RE: RE: patent | wudchuck | Nov 18, 2008, 9:43 am |
| RE: patent | okt0ber | Nov 18, 2008, 9:32 am |
| patent | wudchuck | Nov 18, 2008, 9:00 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Inscopywriter's comments to Wudchuck
Would you, or any other IP experts out there, happen to know if the use of the Internet as part of a potentially patentable process would qualify as either a "machine" (electronic virtual entity, etc.) or "transformation" (process sends claims data through the Internet and transforms it into claims resolution data and trend tracking information)? I have not had an opportunity to look at any recent process patents relating to IP applications, but so many of them are Web based, I was wondering how the use of the Internet in a process patent application was treated by USPTO.
Thanks to you and Wudchuck for your comments.