National News

Viewing comments for:

FTC Probing Insurers Over Credit-based Homeowners Insurance Pricing

National News • December 23, 2008
U.S. regulators have asked nine major insurance companies, including Allstate Corp. and Travelers Cos. Inc., to provide information about how they set prices for homeowners' coverage, the Federal ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: new policy forms -1000 feet across the road .

Posted On: January 4, 2009, 10:39 pm CST
Posted By: State Farm projects
Comment:
As a 10 year veteran of the catastrophe adjusting business, I've worked
on numerous State Farm projects, as well as for many other companies.
All with varying degrees of profit potential. What you're about to read
is worth your time ... trust me. It may save you from making a big
mistake.

We've all heard the horror stories which have been circulating for years
now, about how bad State Farm often treats it's independent adjusters,
as well as their policy holders. To date, however, I've been mostly
spared the bad trips many other adjusters have experienced. I've made
money working for State Farm in the past, but it's getting more and more
difficult, especially on a large CAT.

Now I have my own nightmare to add to the stories you've heard. By the
way, it's true ... they do behave like Nazi's toward independents on
most of their projects, and care about as little for the independent
adjuster, as they do for their policy holders. For those who have worked
for what's come to be known as Hitler's "SF," you know what I'm talking
about. The latest term I've heard to describe them in south Mississippi
is, "The Great Satan." This is how angry people have become here.

This year I was begged, I mean literally begged by a certain
independent, to come and help them out on their hurricane Georges
operation in south Mississippi, because the adjuster before me had
ditched the storm. Fool that I was, I went to try and help out, only to
get the worst screwing I've gotten in a very long time.

To begin with, at least a third of the flood files I was given, required
underwriting reformation before a scope could be agreed to, or any
advances issued. This process was taking up to 30 days when I left. Keep
in mind, in many cases these are people out of their homes without
additional living expenses. Many were so upset, that they were either in
tears when I arrived, or furious that they couldn't get any advance
money. Add to this the problem of closing these files. You can't close a
flood claim that is being corrected for underwriting errors. You can't
bill it either. We couldn't even close our no claims, until what has
come to be known as "The Reformation" is completed on the policy.

When I asked one of their wealthy agents, who's home I just happened to
be handling for minor flood damage, what an elevated structure was, the
agent admitted to me that she had no clue. And that she had not even
been to a seminar or workshop on the subject, because they were
inconveniently held out of town. Far from being an isolated case, there
are hundreds, possibly thousands of State Farm policy holders all across
the southern Gulf Coast, who are getting screwed more than they usually
do by State Farm, all because the company failed to properly school
and(or) test their agents on how to accurately file the underwriting on
a dwelling flood policy.

But the nightmare doesn't end there, the poor people in many cases will
owe money when the underwriting errors are corrected, because they were
being undercharged on their coverage, for in some cases YEARS! Try
handling a claim where, because of the hurricane, the policy holder owes
the insurance company money!!! It's the most negligent situation I've
ever encountered since I started adjusting. It wouldn't surprise me to
see a class action lawsuit against them for this, if their isn't one
already.

And get this, the policy holders all say that after they purchased their
policies, someone came out and inspected their homes in order to verify
the application. Makes you wonder who's watching the store here.

Amazing how these hypocritical bastards will nickel and dime the poor
people to death, meticulously handling their disaster claims to
undeniable lean accuracy. Only to handle the underwriting with such a
disregard for correctness, as to cause a second catastrophe in the poor
people's lives.

It's as if someone owned a grocery store, who didn't care to manage the
receipts for his wholesale inventory, but managed to death, the check
out clerks, the bagboys, and the customers for shoplifting concerns.
Going so far as to do body cavity searches of everyone who dares leave
the store with any merchandise, even though the goods are already paid
for.

What's worse, when I arrived at the CAT two weeks after the storm, no
one informed me how bad things were, because all they were looking for
at that point were warm bodies to help control the dam break of
underwriting errors. Many of the adjusters before me had already fled
the situation.

Little did I know that the underwriting problems had created an
apparently dire legal or political situation, whereby we were told that
the storm office had to be closed by Thanksgiving. This created an extra
element of stress during the operation, that became a nightmare for me
personally. I have a hard time dealing with people who are angry for
good reason. It's hard to put a value on your labor under those kinds of
circumstances, because you have to spend so much of your time hand
holding. Work like this should be billed at time and expense, or a daily
rate, it's that simple.

Rumor is that the Mississippi State insurance commissioner has caught
wind of the big mishap, and is coming down hard on State Farm, forcing
them to rush their claims to completion. Keep in mind that you will
probably not be paid for the time and effort you put into the files you
cannot close before they are reassigned. This is common practice with
State Farm, stealing labor, and don't kid yourself, the adjusting firms
you are working for don't give a damn about you or your money, because
they will get theirs, regardless.

When I received my files, many of the insured's were complaining that we
were the third and fourth adjuster who had contacted them. This was only
two weeks into the storm! Why, because it's getting hard to find good
adjuster's willing to be a part of the "SF." They simply don't pay
enough for the garbage you have to put up with, and it creates
underlying resentment throughout the whole operation. They seem to take
pride in denying people all the they can, and that includes denying the
independent adjuster a fair return on their investment of time and
labor. I swear, working in one of their offices, is often like working
in a maximum security prison. You have no freedom to do anything, except
kiss the guards asses continually, while they strip you of every bit of
pride you ever had in your work. Their arrogance is unequaled in the
industry, and as I have said, I have worked for just about everybody at
one time or another.

My advice. Never ever work for a State Farm catastrophe operation,
unless it's minor wind or hail, or you get lucky and are working in an
independent's branch completely separated from their offices. Otherwise,
you will have to put up with 10 times more crap than working for anyone
else, and if you're lucky, you'll make even less money.

One of the reasons I've always liked adjusting property claims in a
disaster situation, was because I felt like I was helping people.
Working for State Farm, I rarely have that feeling. Instead, I have the
feeling that I'm screwing people, and it's awful. You go home tired at
night, after spending all day on your inspections, and you think about
all the people you screwed that day, because by the time you get done
with withholding their roof tear-off, and their depreciation, and their
hurricane deductible, they are left with nothing, except a premium
notice that just keeps on coming, year after year. This business has
gone down hill precipitously since I got into it ten years ago, and I'm
seriously thinking of leaving the industry. I just don't get that good
feeling I used to, especially working for the Great Satan.

Which brings to mind something that just bugs the crap out of me. One of
the worst things State Farm does, in my opinion, is consider partial
roof replacement a betterment. I wish someone would challenge this in
court, again and again if necessary, because if I was sitting on a jury,
I would throw Holy Water all over them on this issue. It's insane to
call slope replacement a betterment, and we all know it. In the mind of
the average Joe it's a repair, because in most people's minds the word
"roof" is singular.

If any independent adjusters are interested in joining me for a possible
class action lawsuit against State Farm, and the temporary employment
agencies they utilize; for unfair and deceptive labor practices, and
whatever else we can come up with, please contact me at my E-mail
address, or watch for future bulletins on this web page.

I have been told that there is a famed attorney who might be willing to
make our case, due to some common interest in another action he's
undertaken, and which is currently pending against State Farm, by the
policy the holders in the state of Mississippi. Let's face it, our
testimony could be devastating to State Farm, if we spoke on behalf of
the policy holders in any courtroom in the land. It could be the
greatest bombshell ever to hit the industry, and one well deserved. Much
bigger than the Allstate fury currently brewing in California.

What do we have to lose? Most of us don't care if we ever work for them
again anyway. If State Farm disappeared tomorrow, most independents
would jump for joy.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: : listen nobody important
Jan 14, 2009, 2:32 pm
: listen integrity
Jan 14, 2009, 8:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: listen to an industry giant! nobody important
Jan 12, 2009, 1:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: listen to an industry giant! practices ranked worse
Jan 9, 2009, 11:09 am
RE: RE: RE: listen to an industry giant! nobody important
Jan 9, 2009, 9:49 am
RE: RE: listen to an industry giant! U.S. regulators have
Jan 7, 2009, 11:41 pm
RE: listen to an industry giant! Brokette
Jan 7, 2009, 9:55 am
listen to an industry giant! Interesting Brokette!
Jan 6, 2009, 11:27 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: : It doesn't even come close . Brokette
Jan 6, 2009, 11:55 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: : It doesn't even come close . LOOSE ENDS
Jan 6, 2009, 10:22 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: : It doesn't even come close . nobody important
Jan 6, 2009, 10:19 am
RE: RE: RE: : It doesn't even come close . Brokette
Jan 6, 2009, 10:00 am
RE: RE: : It doesn't even come close . Run along, now.
Jan 6, 2009, 9:45 am
RE: : It doesn't even come close . Brokette
Jan 5, 2009, 11:17 pm
: It doesn't even come close . even come close to costing
Jan 5, 2009, 6:57 pm
RE: RE: It doesn't even come close to costing what an ad wou board with the picture.
Jan 5, 2009, 6:54 pm
RE: It doesn't even come close to costing what an ad would c Brokette
Jan 5, 2009, 6:01 pm
It doesn't even come close to costing what an ad would cost State Farm buys ad time during
Jan 5, 2009, 5:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: nobody important
Jan 5, 2009, 12:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Brokette
Jan 5, 2009, 12:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: nobody important
Jan 5, 2009, 12:21 pm
RE: RE: Brokette
Jan 5, 2009, 11:38 am
RE: nobody important
Jan 5, 2009, 11:18 am
"Is it privileged?" WE ALL WANT TO BELIEVE IN COMP
Jan 5, 2009, 10:37 am
RE: RE: RE: new policy forms -1000 feet across the road . Brokette
Jan 5, 2009, 9:35 am
RE: RE: new policy forms -1000 feet across the road . State Farm projects
Jan 4, 2009, 10:39 pm
RE: new policy forms -1000 feet across the road . Brokette
Jan 4, 2009, 10:28 pm
new policy forms -1000 feet across the road . Burden of Proof
Jan 4, 2009, 7:54 pm
RE: RE: Discover the power of knowledge knowledge
Jan 4, 2009, 7:23 pm
RE: Discover the power of knowledge does not go high enough.
Jan 4, 2009, 7:21 pm
Discover the power of knowledge would not tell the attorney wh
Jan 4, 2009, 7:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: we should all be adults-nation's worst Brokette
Jan 4, 2009, 3:59 pm
RE: RE: we should all be adults-nation's worst Nobler purpose
Jan 4, 2009, 2:56 pm
RE: we should all be adults Nobler purpose
Jan 4, 2009, 2:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: in their investigation of claims. Brokette
Jan 4, 2009, 1:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: in their investigation of claims. That is just penny wise and po
Jan 4, 2009, 11:47 am
RE: RE: in their investigation of claims. Brokette
Jan 4, 2009, 10:10 am
RE: in their investigation of claims. insurance industry , hard look
Jan 4, 2009, 7:30 am
adults.RIGHT. battled for eight years to
Jan 4, 2009, 6:53 am
in their investigation of claims. You might think this is j investigation of claims
Jan 4, 2009, 6:37 am
RE: RE: we should all be adults Brokette
Jan 3, 2009, 10:33 pm
RE: we should all be adults Pay more attention.
Jan 3, 2009, 9:05 pm
RE: choice - EXPERIENCE Brokette
Jan 3, 2009, 5:38 pm
RE: RE: choice - IT,S A MESSAGE OF TOLERANCE EXPERIENCE - IT,S A MESSAGE
Jan 2, 2009, 9:29 pm
RE: choice - IT,S A MESSAGE OF TOLERANCE EXPERIENCE read one more time
Jan 2, 2009, 9:02 pm
RE: Credit Scoring and Insurance completely irritated
Jan 2, 2009, 6:57 pm
RE: To: Greg - Dec 29 12:59 PM FL vs FA
Jan 2, 2009, 6:43 pm
choice - EXPERIENCE IT,S A MESSAGE OF TOLERANCE
Jan 2, 2009, 11:29 am
RE: RE: RE: : @companies ask choice point Brokette
Jan 2, 2009, 9:38 am
RE: RE: : @companies ask choice point I will cast my lot!
Jan 1, 2009, 2:11 pm
RE: : @companies ask choice point Brokette
Jan 1, 2009, 11:21 am
: @companies ask choice point professionals
Jan 1, 2009, 8:10 am
RE: about the rights of the policyholders nobody important
Dec 31, 2008, 9:33 pm
: we should > Talkback-government bailout AND YOU ALL WANTED JOE
Dec 31, 2008, 7:30 pm
RE: about the rights of the policyholders LOUD NOISES
Dec 31, 2008, 4:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: IQ Chief Executive Officer of State Fa Brokette
Dec 31, 2008, 12:38 pm
RE: we should all be adults try cutting and paste this in
Dec 31, 2008, 10:11 am
RE: RE: IQ Chief Executive Officer of State Fa nobody important Dec 31, 2008,
Dec 31, 2008, 10:05 am
about the rights of the policyholders nobody important
Dec 31, 2008, 10:01 am
RE: RE: RE: a tool-WHAT PART TO YOU ALL NOT GET? SAY I CAN
Dec 31, 2008, 9:58 am
RE: RE: a tool-WHAT PART TO YOU ALL NOT GET? notthing about this HUH!!!
Dec 31, 2008, 9:55 am
RE: RE: o-with little federal oversight Buckeye
Dec 31, 2008, 9:38 am
RE: o-with little federal oversight Brokette
Dec 30, 2008, 9:30 pm
o-with little federal oversight federal oversight.
Dec 30, 2008, 8:29 pm
RE: a tool LOOK IT UP-
Dec 30, 2008, 3:44 pm
RE: no right to information about an investigation class of business.-
Dec 30, 2008, 3:42 pm
RE: W -see court records and evidence in a consumer fraud ca keep secret
Dec 30, 2008, 3:38 pm
W -see court records and evidence in a consumer fraud case t misconduct.
Dec 30, 2008, 3:33 pm
RE: To: Greg - Dec 29 12:59 PM Greg
Dec 30, 2008, 3:03 pm
RE: RE: What are predictive models? Buckeye
Dec 30, 2008, 2:51 pm
RE: What are predictive models? nobody important
Dec 30, 2008, 2:43 pm
What are predictive models? Buckeye
Dec 30, 2008, 2:14 pm
RE: To: Greg - Dec 29 12:59 PM nobody important
Dec 30, 2008, 1:23 pm
To: Greg - Dec 29 12:59 PM Lame Brain
Dec 30, 2008, 12:34 pm
Discussion thread? Buckeye
Dec 30, 2008, 11:39 am
RE: haha - illiterate fool - Leave the country nobody important
Dec 30, 2008, 11:32 am
haha - illiterate fool - Leave the country Mark
Dec 30, 2008, 10:23 am
RE: IN SALT-LAKE nobody important
Dec 30, 2008, 10:22 am
IN SALT-LAKE former in-house
Dec 30, 2008, 10:16 am
RE: RE: RE: IQ Chief -WE CAN MAKE LAWS WORK FOR US BECAUSE W MAKE LAWS WORK FOR
Dec 30, 2008, 10:09 am
RE: RE: RE: IQ Chief Executive Officer of State Fa Brokette
Dec 30, 2008, 10:06 am
RE: RE: IQ Chief Executive - IS THAT SO BILL]. Don Quixote
Dec 30, 2008, 10:02 am
RE: RE: IQ Chief Executive - IS THAT SO BILL]. Jake
Dec 30, 2008, 10:01 am
RE: IQ Chief Executive - IS THAT SO BILL]. !A HAVE DONE NOTHING ABOUT !
Dec 30, 2008, 9:55 am
RE: RE: IQ Chief Executive on their financial strength
Dec 30, 2008, 9:33 am
IQ Chief Executive Officer of State Fa Bill
Dec 30, 2008, 9:33 am
RE: RE: IQ Chief Executive Officer of State Fa Two former in-house attorneys
Dec 30, 2008, 9:22 am
Loud Noises Buckeye
Dec 30, 2008, 7:31 am
not criminals - just a idiots in the insurance
Dec 29, 2008, 8:56 pm
RE: to: greg ANGER
Dec 29, 2008, 6:51 pm
RE: RE: - Its pretty simple They are not criminals - just a loco in la cabesa
Dec 29, 2008, 6:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: from a great book!!
Dec 29, 2008, 6:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: to: greg insguru
Dec 29, 2008, 6:05 pm
RE: yourself about a subject.-thats the only way nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 3:38 pm
yourself about a subject.-thats the only way
Dec 29, 2008, 3:10 pm
RE: you would not known the court has all of this..... watching these tapes
Dec 29, 2008, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: RE: Nobody important is nobody smart nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 2:44 pm
RE: RE: Nobody important is nobody smart Delicious Pastries
Dec 29, 2008, 2:32 pm
RE: Nobody important is nobody smart nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 1:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: to: greg nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 1:22 pm
RE: RE: from a great book!! nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 1:19 pm
RE: from a great book!! privileged?"
Dec 29, 2008, 1:09 pm
RE: RE: To: Lame Brain Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 12:59 pm
Nobody Important and Lame Brain Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 12:55 pm
from a great book!!
Dec 29, 2008, 12:51 pm
to: brokette Lame Brain
Dec 29, 2008, 12:29 pm
Nobody important is nobody smart Darren
Dec 29, 2008, 12:26 pm
RE: RE: to: greg Lame Brain
Dec 29, 2008, 12:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: IQ rather than Credit - Correction Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 12:16 pm
RE: RE: to: greg Brokette
Dec 29, 2008, 12:15 pm
RE: to: greg nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 12:11 pm
RE: RE: IQ rather than Credit Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 12:10 pm
RE: To: Lame Brain Lame Brain
Dec 29, 2008, 12:10 pm
to: greg Lame Brain
Dec 29, 2008, 11:57 am
To: Lame Brain Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 11:48 am
RE: IQ rather than Credit Lame Brain
Dec 29, 2008, 11:22 am
RE: IQ Chief Executive Officer of State Fa have them complete IQ tests
Dec 29, 2008, 10:43 am
IQ rather than Credit Interesting Study
Dec 29, 2008, 10:41 am
Scoring - Insuranceblame the govt and the banks. THE BIG CEO$$$
Dec 29, 2008, 10:39 am
RE: Credit Scoring and Insurance Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 10:29 am
government to help it remain in business. loans
Dec 29, 2008, 10:20 am
Credit Scoring and Insurance Average consumer
Dec 29, 2008, 10:15 am
no right to information about an investigation policyholders have no right ,S
Dec 29, 2008, 9:47 am
RE: To: National News • December 23, 2 nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 9:39 am
RE: a tool nobody important
Dec 29, 2008, 9:38 am
To: National News • December 23, 2 Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 9:37 am
a tool for Brokette
Dec 29, 2008, 9:32 am
Hey Einstein Greg
Dec 29, 2008, 9:28 am
Remeber the hey days One
Dec 29, 2008, 9:23 am
repeal insurers anti trust exemption Fair Game
Dec 29, 2008, 9:18 am
RE: RE: Abe 3:06 Brokette
Dec 29, 2008, 9:17 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Let's use some logic in deciding the rules. Jr. said
Dec 29, 2008, 9:15 am
RE: - Its pretty simple They are not criminals - just a lit Hope
Dec 29, 2008, 8:58 am
RE: Abe 3:06 cheli
Dec 29, 2008, 8:03 am
RE: CHELI 2:47 cheli
Dec 29, 2008, 7:59 am
we should all be adults Pay more attention
Dec 29, 2008, 2:17 am
- Its pretty simple They are not criminals - just a little Here is something I know
Dec 29, 2008, 1:47 am
RE: RE: RE: TO Confidence led upright. You believed in honor experience says - - -
Dec 29, 2008, 1:18 am
RE: RE: TO Confidence led upright. You believed in honor, an Peon Agent
Dec 28, 2008, 9:14 pm
RE: TO Confidence led upright. You believed in honor, and th MELANIE
Dec 28, 2008, 7:56 pm
TO BOB KOCHAN. from ' Randy DOWN
Dec 28, 2008, 7:51 pm
RE: Interesting......point non-regulated world.
Dec 28, 2008, 5:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use f Einstein
Dec 28, 2008, 10:29 am
RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them specifically National News • December 23, 2
Dec 27, 2008, 9:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them On The Fox
Dec 27, 2008, 8:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them spec insguru
Dec 27, 2008, 3:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Are you kidding me insguru
Dec 27, 2008, 3:46 pm
RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them specific nobody important
Dec 27, 2008, 3:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for t insguru
Dec 27, 2008, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them Peon Agent
Dec 27, 2008, 1:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them spec insguru
Dec 27, 2008, 12:24 pm
RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them specific let me help you.
Dec 27, 2008, 10:23 am
RE: RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them specific point
Dec 27, 2008, 10:21 am
RE: @companies ask choice point to use for them specifically insguru
Dec 27, 2008, 9:43 am
@companies ask choice point to use for them specifically. Melanie
Dec 26, 2008, 8:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Credit Scoring insguru
Dec 26, 2008, 7:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: FTC Probing Insurers Over Credit-based Homeowner Greg
Dec 26, 2008, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Credit Scoring Greg
Dec 26, 2008, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: FTC Probing Insurers Over Credit-based Homeowner SWFL Agent
Dec 26, 2008, 1:50 pm
RE: RE: FTC Probing Insurers Over Credit-based Homeowners In InsIsMyPassion
Dec 26, 2008, 12:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Credit Scoring No Way
Dec 26, 2008, 11:36 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Credit Scoring Greg
Dec 26, 2008, 10:29 am
RE: FTC Probing Insurers Over Credit-based Homeowners Insura Greg
Dec 26, 2008, 10:25 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Credit Scoring RateAdequacy
Dec 26, 2008, 10:19 am
RE: RE: RE: Credit Scoring Greg
Dec 26, 2008, 9:36 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: staffman - Its pretty simple Santa Clause
Dec 24, 2008, 2:34 pm
RE: RE: To Old Ins Guy & Peon Agent Brokette
Dec 24, 2008, 11:41 am
RE: To Old Ins Guy & Peon Agent Peon Agent
Dec 24, 2008, 11:30 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: staffman - Its pretty simple Peon Agent
Dec 24, 2008, 11:27 am
To Old Ins Guy & Peon Agent Brokette
Dec 24, 2008, 11:21 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: staffman - Its pretty simple Actuary
Dec 24, 2008, 10:59 am
RE: RE: Auto Notification - Mike & Jake Peon Agent
Dec 24, 2008, 10:35 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: staffman - Its pretty simple staffman
Dec 24, 2008, 10:31 am
RE: RE: RE: staffman - Its pretty simple Mike
Dec 24, 2008, 10:26 am
RE: RE: staffman - Its pretty simple staffman
Dec 24, 2008, 10:19 am
RE: RE: Auto Notification - Mike & Jake Old Ins Guy
Dec 24, 2008, 10:06 am
RE: Auto Notification - Mike & Jake Brokette
Dec 24, 2008, 10:02 am
RE: RE: staffman - Its pretty simple - Idiot!!!! Ralph
Dec 24, 2008, 9:33 am
RE: staffman - Its pretty simple Bob
Dec 24, 2008, 9:25 am
staffman - Its pretty simple Mike
Dec 24, 2008, 9:23 am
Income issue staffman
Dec 24, 2008, 9:14 am
RE: Auto Notification Jake
Dec 24, 2008, 9:13 am
Auto Notification Mike
Dec 24, 2008, 9:12 am
RE: RE: RE: Let's use some logic in deciding the rules. Juliet
Dec 24, 2008, 9:10 am
RE: RE: Let's use some logic in deciding the rules. Obama Gurl
Dec 24, 2008, 8:52 am
RE: Let's use some logic in deciding the rules. Obama Gurl
Dec 24, 2008, 7:54 am
Let's use some logic in deciding the rules. Democratic Logic
Dec 24, 2008, 7:43 am
RE: RE: Why I do not accept the - Dar 6:23 nobody important
Dec 24, 2008, 7:04 am
To please......please!! Buckeye
Dec 24, 2008, 6:15 am
RE: RE: Why I do not accept the - Dar 6:23 EGoyle
Dec 23, 2008, 9:03 pm
RE: Why I do not accept the - Dar 6:23 Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 6:50 pm
Why I do not accept the "Credit Scoring" studies DarNovak
Dec 23, 2008, 6:23 pm
RE: Why I do not accept EGoyle
Dec 23, 2008, 6:08 pm
Why I do not accept "Ccredit Scoring" DarNovak
Dec 23, 2008, 5:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Are you kidding me - Mike 3:50 Seriously
Dec 23, 2008, 5:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: Are you kidding me - Mark 3:34 LOL - Right
Dec 23, 2008, 5:15 pm
RE: standardized score EGoyle
Dec 23, 2008, 5:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Are you kidding me - Mike 3:50 Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 5:08 pm
standardized score nick
Dec 23, 2008, 4:41 pm
RE: RE: Are you kidding me (Rick) Mark
Dec 23, 2008, 4:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: Are you kidding me Mike
Dec 23, 2008, 3:50 pm
RE: RE: Are you kidding me Mark
Dec 23, 2008, 3:44 pm
RE: RE: Are you kidding me - Nope Insurance Man
Dec 23, 2008, 3:43 pm
RE: Are you kidding me Rick
Dec 23, 2008, 3:38 pm
RE: Are you kidding me - Nope Abe
Dec 23, 2008, 3:37 pm
Are you kidding me Insurance Man
Dec 23, 2008, 3:31 pm
Wow Peon Agent
Dec 23, 2008, 3:31 pm
RE: FDA & The Drug Companies Matt
Dec 23, 2008, 3:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? Mike
Dec 23, 2008, 3:22 pm
FDA & The Drug Companies One Who Doesn't Get It
Dec 23, 2008, 3:20 pm
In with the new and out with the evil old ones Waiting on Obama to take over
Dec 23, 2008, 3:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 3:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: Common Sense joe
Dec 23, 2008, 3:15 pm
Abe 3:06 Rick
Dec 23, 2008, 3:14 pm
Peon Agent?? I don think so... Mike
Dec 23, 2008, 3:13 pm
RE: RE: Common Sense Peon Agent
Dec 23, 2008, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? Abe
Dec 23, 2008, 3:06 pm
RE: RE: Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? Doug
Dec 23, 2008, 3:05 pm
CHELI 2:47 Rick
Dec 23, 2008, 3:01 pm
RE: Vegans vs meat eaters joe
Dec 23, 2008, 2:51 pm
RE: InsMgmt 2:13 CHELI
Dec 23, 2008, 2:47 pm
RE: Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 2:45 pm
Vegans vs meat eaters We try not to write vegans
Dec 23, 2008, 2:44 pm
InsMgmt 2:13 Rick
Dec 23, 2008, 2:44 pm
RE: RE: Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? Doug
Dec 23, 2008, 2:39 pm
RE: Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? CHELI
Dec 23, 2008, 2:37 pm
RE: RE: Common Sense joe
Dec 23, 2008, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: Compassion? Brook
Dec 23, 2008, 2:35 pm
Hey Brook? Will you take this bet? Mike
Dec 23, 2008, 2:33 pm
RE: Compassion? Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 2:30 pm
RE: RE: SOCIALIZED INSURANCE brad
Dec 23, 2008, 2:28 pm
Compassion? Actuary
Dec 23, 2008, 2:28 pm
Rates are like water... Vlad
Dec 23, 2008, 2:27 pm
RE: RE: RE: Common Sense - Jake 2:19 Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Common Sense - Rachel 2:11 CHELI
Dec 23, 2008, 2:24 pm
RE: RE: Common Sense - Rachel 2:11 Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 2:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: Common Sense CHELI
Dec 23, 2008, 2:21 pm
RE: RE: Common Sense Jake
Dec 23, 2008, 2:19 pm
RE: RE: Common Sense - Joe Doug
Dec 23, 2008, 2:16 pm
RE: Common Sense joe
Dec 23, 2008, 2:14 pm
RE: Credit Scoring CHELI
Dec 23, 2008, 2:14 pm
Rick 1:41 InsMgmt
Dec 23, 2008, 2:13 pm
RE: Govt Assessable Mutual Insurance Stat Guy
Dec 23, 2008, 2:12 pm
RE: Common Sense Rachel
Dec 23, 2008, 2:11 pm
RE: RE: SOCIALIZED INSURANCE Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 2:10 pm
RE: RE: In Texas Whitey pays same as others including Obama Stat Guy
Dec 23, 2008, 2:06 pm
Common Sense Ralph
Dec 23, 2008, 2:05 pm
RE: SOCIALIZED INSURANCE Porfirio
Dec 23, 2008, 2:01 pm
RE: experience says - - - Mrs Dean Wormer
Dec 23, 2008, 1:58 pm
RE: RE: RE: Interesting......how it's supposed to work.. Stat Guy
Dec 23, 2008, 1:57 pm
Lets do a study on NASCAR Ricky Rud
Dec 23, 2008, 1:53 pm
RE: SOCIALIZED INSURANCE brad
Dec 23, 2008, 1:48 pm
RE: Govt Assessable Mutual Insurance brad
Dec 23, 2008, 1:45 pm
SOCIALIZED INSURANCE NEVER FEAR THE OBAMA IS HERE
Dec 23, 2008, 1:43 pm
InsMgmt 1:15 Rick
Dec 23, 2008, 1:41 pm
RE: Pat 11:41 Pat Beranger
Dec 23, 2008, 1:40 pm
RE: Good Posts Bill
Dec 23, 2008, 1:37 pm
RE: Scoring - cd 1:12 Ratemaker
Dec 23, 2008, 1:32 pm
To Please Bill
Dec 23, 2008, 1:32 pm
Bob 12:49 InsMgmt
Dec 23, 2008, 1:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Govt Assessable Mutual Insurance ins product manager
Dec 23, 2008, 1:25 pm
FTC Probing Insurers Over Credit-based Homeowners Insurance RolfNeu
Dec 23, 2008, 1:25 pm
to please..... Bob
Dec 23, 2008, 1:23 pm
Sick of race card Bill
Dec 23, 2008, 1:22 pm
Pat 11:41 InsMgmt
Dec 23, 2008, 1:17 pm
George 11:28 InsMgmt
Dec 23, 2008, 1:15 pm
Rick 11:32 InsMgmt
Dec 23, 2008, 1:13 pm
Scoring cd
Dec 23, 2008, 1:12 pm
Curious 12:49 Hawk
Dec 23, 2008, 1:11 pm
RE: RE: Govt Assessable Mutual Insurance staffman
Dec 23, 2008, 1:07 pm
Good Posts Ray
Dec 23, 2008, 1:06 pm
fact.... m & m
Dec 23, 2008, 1:03 pm
RE: Govt Assessable Mutual Insurance The Soprano Family
Dec 23, 2008, 12:54 pm
sam the claims guy Rick
Dec 23, 2008, 12:52 pm
Govt Assessable Mutual Insurance ins product manager
Dec 23, 2008, 12:51 pm
RE: RE: Credit Scoring Curious
Dec 23, 2008, 12:49 pm
To InsMgmt Bob
Dec 23, 2008, 12:49 pm
Credit Scoring
Dec 23, 2008, 12:46 pm
RE: Obama is going to fix this. Hope & Change Be A Coming!
Dec 23, 2008, 12:44 pm
RE: Credit Scoring Texas
Dec 23, 2008, 12:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: In Texas Whitey pays same as others including Ob Glennie
Dec 23, 2008, 12:32 pm
experience says - - - sam the claims guy
Dec 23, 2008, 12:22 pm
RE: RE: In Texas Whitey pays same as others including Obama please.....
Dec 23, 2008, 12:20 pm
RE: In Texas Whitey pays same as others including Obama Jack J Maniscalco
Dec 23, 2008, 12:18 pm
RE: Credit Scoring company gal
Dec 23, 2008, 12:16 pm
In Texas Whitey pays same as others including Obama Texas Agent
Dec 23, 2008, 12:03 pm
RE: Credit Scoring nobody important
Dec 23, 2008, 12:02 pm
RE: Law-yer. 11:24 Ned
Dec 23, 2008, 11:58 am
RE: RE: Obama is going to fix this. Barack Obama
Dec 23, 2008, 11:57 am
RE: Obama is going to fix this. glennie
Dec 23, 2008, 11:56 am
Obama is going to fix this. Obama's gonna fix all this!
Dec 23, 2008, 11:54 am
Credit Scoring John Q. Agent
Dec 23, 2008, 11:49 am
RE: Credit Scoring Kelly
Dec 23, 2008, 11:49 am
Law-yer. 11:24 Hawk
Dec 23, 2008, 11:45 am
Credit Scoring Ned
Dec 23, 2008, 11:41 am
RE: InsMgmt 11:15 Pat Beranger
Dec 23, 2008, 11:41 am
change we can believe in Barack Obama
Dec 23, 2008, 11:38 am
InsMgmt 11:15 Rick
Dec 23, 2008, 11:32 am
RE: RE: Interesting...... George
Dec 23, 2008, 11:28 am
RE: Interesting...... NJ Agent
Dec 23, 2008, 11:26 am
RE: Interesting...... Law-yer
Dec 23, 2008, 11:24 am
RE: Interesting...... Glennie
Dec 23, 2008, 11:17 am
RE: Interesting...... InsMgmt
Dec 23, 2008, 11:15 am
RE: Interesting...... Masonman
Dec 23, 2008, 11:09 am
Rut Roe The Fox
Dec 23, 2008, 11:06 am
Interesting...... Brokette
Dec 23, 2008, 11:00 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.