National News
Viewing comments for:
U.S. Safety Group Calls for Cell Phone Driving Ban
National News January 13, 2009
The National Safety Council, which campaigned to get U.S. states to enforce seatbelt laws, is taking on cellphones, saying it is starting a campaign to ban all use of mobile phones while ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: missing the point | Yorkie | Jan 20, 2009, 6:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: no one to talk to | cheli | Jan 15, 2009, 2:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: I give up....... | Rikky | Jan 15, 2009, 1:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning | Dawn | Jan 15, 2009, 12:32 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: no one to talk to | SFOInsuranceLady | Jan 15, 2009, 12:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning | SFOInsuranceLady | Jan 15, 2009, 12:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning | Dawn | Jan 15, 2009, 9:55 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning | cheli | Jan 15, 2009, 9:53 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Banning | nobody important | Jan 15, 2009, 9:29 am |
| RE: RE: Banning | cheli | Jan 15, 2009, 9:19 am |
| RE: Banning | Bill | Jan 15, 2009, 9:15 am |
| RE: RE: no one to talk to | cheli | Jan 15, 2009, 8:58 am |
| RE: RE: RE: I give up....... | Dawn | Jan 15, 2009, 7:57 am |
| RE: RE: I give up....... | SFOInsuranceLady | Jan 15, 2009, 1:53 am |
| RE: no one to talk to | SFOInsuranceLady | Jan 15, 2009, 1:45 am |
| no one to talk to | cheli | Jan 14, 2009, 4:15 pm |
| RE: RE: I give up....... | cheli | Jan 14, 2009, 4:12 pm |
| RE: I give up....... | Rikky | Jan 14, 2009, 4:08 pm |
| I give up....... | SFOInsuranceLady | Jan 14, 2009, 3:54 pm |
| RE: Location, Location, Location | nobody important | Jan 14, 2009, 2:27 pm |
| RE: Loud Noises emanating from our vehicle | Rikky | Jan 14, 2009, 2:22 pm |
| Location, Location, Location | Mr. Obvious | Jan 14, 2009, 1:20 pm |
| RE: Loud Noises emanating from our vehicle | wudchuck | Jan 14, 2009, 12:53 pm |
| Loud Noises emanating from our vehicle | Dog Luvver | Jan 14, 2009, 11:46 am |
| enforcement | wudchuck | Jan 14, 2009, 10:14 am |
| RE: ban - I say NOT! | nobody important | Jan 14, 2009, 10:03 am |
| RE: RE: RE: How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? | cheli | Jan 14, 2009, 9:24 am |
| RE: RE: ban - I say NOT! | cheli | Jan 14, 2009, 9:16 am |
| RE: RE: RE: So What | brainfreeze | Jan 14, 2009, 3:59 am |
| The things you see on- the- road..... | Boner | Jan 13, 2009, 5:37 pm |
| RE: RE: ban - I say NOT! | Oli Gark | Jan 13, 2009, 4:59 pm |
| RE: RE: How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? | Yucca Dew | Jan 13, 2009, 4:50 pm |
| RE: KKMSO | matt | Jan 13, 2009, 4:22 pm |
| RE: ban - I say NOT! | Ohioan | Jan 13, 2009, 4:16 pm |
| ban - I say NOT! | wudchuck | Jan 13, 2009, 3:55 pm |
| RE: What's wrong with it? | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 3:50 pm |
| What's wrong with it? | Rikky | Jan 13, 2009, 3:47 pm |
| RE: How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 3:46 pm |
| RE: This is a ridiculous law with good intentions | Lame Crane | Jan 13, 2009, 3:43 pm |
| RE: Police do it | SFOInsueranceLady | Jan 13, 2009, 3:35 pm |
| Police do it | Ohioan | Jan 13, 2009, 3:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | nobody important | Jan 13, 2009, 3:28 pm |
| This is a ridiculous law with good intentions | Dawn | Jan 13, 2009, 3:25 pm |
| How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? | Lame Brain | Jan 13, 2009, 3:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: What was that American thing called again, oh ye | TJ | Jan 13, 2009, 3:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: | Insurance Dude | Jan 13, 2009, 3:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So W | Joey | Jan 13, 2009, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 2:56 pm |
| RE: Thanks Cheli and SFOInsurance Lady | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 2:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | phoner | Jan 13, 2009, 2:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 2:50 pm |
| Thanks Cheli and SFOInsurance Lady | Hmmmm.... | Jan 13, 2009, 2:49 pm |
| So What | Mike | Jan 13, 2009, 2:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 2:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 2:42 pm |
| RE: Blooth Tooth Doesnt help Much | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | SFOInsurancelady | Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | SFOInsurancelady | Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | SFOInsurancelady | Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | Joey | Jan 13, 2009, 2:39 pm |
| RE: Blooth Tooth Doesnt help Much | Doug | Jan 13, 2009, 2:36 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | SFOInsuranceLady | Jan 13, 2009, 2:34 pm |
| Blooth Tooth Doesnt help Much | Mike | Jan 13, 2009, 2:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | SFOInsuranceLady | Jan 13, 2009, 2:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 2:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | Joey | Jan 13, 2009, 1:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 1:50 pm |
| Cell Phone ban | Pat | Jan 13, 2009, 1:50 pm |
| Cell Phone ban | Pat | Jan 13, 2009, 1:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | Amazed | Jan 13, 2009, 1:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | cheli | Jan 13, 2009, 1:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: What was that American thing called again, oh ye | nobody important | Jan 13, 2009, 1:35 pm |
| RE: What was that American thing called again, oh yea, FREED | Franz | Jan 13, 2009, 1:34 pm |
| RE: RE: What was that American thing called again, oh yea, F | Amazed | Jan 13, 2009, 1:31 pm |
| RE: So What | Hmmmm.... | Jan 13, 2009, 1:29 pm |
| RE: What was that American thing called again, oh yea, FREED | glenf | Jan 13, 2009, 1:25 pm |
| studies | Devil's Advocate | Jan 13, 2009, 1:11 pm |
| What was that American thing called again, oh yea, FREEDOM | Tommy Payne | Jan 13, 2009, 1:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | Dawn | Jan 13, 2009, 1:06 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | nobody important | Jan 13, 2009, 12:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: So What | Safety Guy | Jan 13, 2009, 12:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Banning | The Jerk | Jan 13, 2009, 12:48 pm |
| Seat Belts & Phones | JERRY ANDERSON | Jan 13, 2009, 12:46 pm |
| Really? | The Jerk | Jan 13, 2009, 12:46 pm |
| RE: Banning | KKSMO | Jan 13, 2009, 12:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: So What | The other side | Jan 13, 2009, 12:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: So What | glenf | Jan 13, 2009, 12:31 pm |
| Banning | The other side | Jan 13, 2009, 12:31 pm |
| RE: RE: So What | Dawn | Jan 13, 2009, 12:27 pm |
| Bravo---Ban the phones while driving | Wayne | Jan 13, 2009, 12:22 pm |
| RE: RE: So What | caveat emptor | Jan 13, 2009, 11:16 am |
| RE: So What | Stat Guy | Jan 13, 2009, 10:46 am |
| RE: RE: So What | Bluelouboyle | Jan 13, 2009, 9:58 am |
| RE: So What | Ratemaker | Jan 13, 2009, 9:26 am |
| RE: RE: So What | abouttobecrucifiedforthis | Jan 13, 2009, 8:59 am |
| RE: So What | matt | Jan 13, 2009, 8:44 am |
| So What | nobody important | Jan 13, 2009, 8:16 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning
Enforce what we have and raise the penalty so it's not worth the risk. If the penalty for no insurance is $5K, insurance only costs $3K, people would actually buy insurance. Right now it's only $500, so it's 'worth it' to risk it. Plus the so-called law that says if you cause an accident and don't have liability, it's $1200 fine? I've personally reported 2 people who hit me and known of 3 others that were reported, and guess what? NOTHING. OUR insurance companies paid for damages while the drivers with no insurance walked away.
And no license? 15-25 times picked up is the average for one person before they do a few days in jail. (or they kill someone)
The ONLY people who will be affected by a cell phone ban is the people who work, have insurance, have tags, and care about fines and points. And, IMHO, is what's wrong with it. Easy money for municipalities. They won't target the car with no hood or tags, because they won't pay anyway. They'll target us. And, yes, I've had cops tell me point blank that if a 'nice' car is going 95 vs a POS going 95, the nice car will get stopped because they will pay the fine. The POS probably has no insurance, no license, but it's a 'cost' to the municipality because they will never pay the fine until they are pursued. (which costs money) And the fines aren't high enough to justify further legal action, even if you could find them. (which a lot of them just disappear)
If they'd get the others off the road, the number of accidents would drop. Again, not rocket science.