National News

Viewing comments for:

Study: Insurers' Customer Retention Critical in Hard Economic Times

National News • April 22, 2009
As millions of U.S. households face financial hardship in the current U.S. recession, retaining existing customers has never been more important. For insurance carriers in terms of long-term ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: : STATE FARM,S$13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Covera

Posted On: April 26, 2009, 11:33 am CDT
Posted By: but will sell renters policies
Comment:
This is what State Farm wants to be able to cherry pick.
Not paying for floods, fires and denying tornado coverage---BUT will sell renters policies, except in Jackson, Harrison
and Hancock counties. Except, except, except---give us a break.




JACKSON, Miss. (AP) - State Farm says it will resume selling
renters insurance in parts of Mississippi away from the Gulf Coast.
Company spokesman David Majors said that State Farm
will still not selling new homeowners policies anywhere in the
state, but will sell renters policies except in Jackson, Harrison
and Hancock counties.
Illinois-based State Farm stopped selling new homeowners and
renters policies in February 2007, citing the avalanche of legal
challenges that followed 2005's Hurricane Katrina.
Majors says some existing policyholders, mainly north of
Interstate 10, will be allowed to reduce their hurricane deductible
from 5 percent of their policy value to 2 percent, if the customer
had auto insurance with State Farm as of Nov. 1, 2008, and agrees
to pay extra......State Farm Hit With $13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Coverage


An Oklahoma couple has won nearly $13 million after a jury failed to buy State Farm's argument that high winds did not damage their tornado-wracked home

State Farm Hit With $13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Coverage
By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

An Oklahoma couple has won nearly $13 million after a jury failed to buy State Farm's argument that high winds did not damage their tornado-wracked home
State Farm Hit With $13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Coverage
By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

An Oklahoma couple has won nearly $13 million after a jury failed to buy State Farm's argument that high winds did not damage their tornado-wracked home

State Farm Hit With $13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Coverage
By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

An Oklahoma couple has won nearly $13 million after a jury failed to buy State Farm's argument that high winds did not damage their tornado-wracked home

State Farm Hit With $13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Coverage
By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

An Oklahoma couple has won nearly $13 million after a jury failed to buy State Farm's argument that high winds did not damage their tornado-wracked home

State Farm Hit With $13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Coverage
By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

An Oklahoma couple has won nearly $13 million after a jury failed to buy State Farm's argument that high winds did not damage their tornado-wracked home

State Farm Hit With $13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Coverage
By NICK SULLIVAN, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

An Oklahoma couple has won nearly $13 million after a jury failed to buy State Farm's argument that high winds did not damage their tornado-wracked home

devastating storms.

The investigators, Haag Engineering Co. and E.A. Renfroe Co., were not parties to the case.

Haag is one of the engineering firms State Farm has hired to assess damages from Hurricane Katrina
Subject Posted By Posted On
Apr 28, 2009, 8:59 am
RE: RE: : STATE FARM,S$13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornad THE TRUTH
Apr 27, 2009, 5:43 pm
RE: : STATE FARM,S$13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Co STEVE
Apr 27, 2009, 11:32 am
RE: RE: post was fictitious.retaining existing customers
Apr 26, 2009, 4:53 pm
RE: may be other cases where similar questions should be rai bought and paid for the secrec
Apr 26, 2009, 4:46 pm
may be other cases where similar questions should be raised. questions should be raised.
Apr 26, 2009, 4:44 pm
RE: The Reality This brings us to the really
Apr 26, 2009, 4:35 pm
RE: The Reality
Apr 26, 2009, 4:30 pm
The Reality Bernard
Apr 26, 2009, 2:12 pm
RE: : STATE FARM,S$13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Co Verdict
Apr 26, 2009, 11:37 am
: STATE FARM,S$13 Million Verdict for Denying Tornado Covera but will sell renters policies
Apr 26, 2009, 11:33 am
RE: RE: RE: STATE FARM,S principles-loyalty. Bernard Rosauer
Apr 25, 2009, 11:49 am
RE: RE: STATE FARM,S principles clown.
Apr 25, 2009, 11:29 am
RE: STATE FARM,S principles (State Farm) defense counsel d
Apr 25, 2009, 11:19 am
RE: RE: STATE FARM,S principles-loyalty. Penny wise, Pound foolish...
Apr 25, 2009, 11:15 am
RE: STATE FARM,S principles
Apr 24, 2009, 10:19 pm
STATE FARM,S principles Is it privileged
Apr 24, 2009, 10:04 pm
www.evenbetteryet.com Bernard Rosauer
Apr 24, 2009, 1:06 pm
RE: post was fictitious.retaining existing customers judgmentjudgmentjudgment
Apr 24, 2009, 9:00 am
post was fictitious.retaining existing customers how about retainingChief,S.
Apr 24, 2009, 8:58 am
April 23rd post was fictitious. Bernard Rosauer
Apr 24, 2009, 12:18 am
www.evenbetteryet.com Berny
Apr 23, 2009, 2:53 pm
Hmmm. Bernard Rosauer
Apr 22, 2009, 8:38 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.