National News
Viewing comments for:
Obama Flexible But Says Public Health Option Would Control Costs
National News June 24, 2009
President Barack Obama said Tuesday his healthcare overhaul needed a public insurance option to enforce market "discipline," but stopped short of saying he would veto legislation without ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Obama's claimed coup of 80 B from the Pharmaceutical Industr | Hooray for Capitalism | Jun 30, 2009, 7:36 am |
| RE: Some questions for the public option advocates -Gill | TAR | Jun 25, 2009, 1:07 pm |
| Some questions for the public option advocates | Gill Fin | Jun 25, 2009, 12:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | Reagan | Jun 25, 2009, 9:58 am |
| RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | TAR | Jun 25, 2009, 8:36 am |
| RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | Fedup with the Feds | Jun 24, 2009, 3:26 pm |
| RE: Mr. Obama's question | V for Vendetta | Jun 24, 2009, 2:50 pm |
| RE: Too Old a Cat to be Fooled by a Kitten | Dawn | Jun 24, 2009, 2:44 pm |
| RE: Mr. Obama's question | Old & Tired | Jun 24, 2009, 2:22 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | BullOak | Jun 24, 2009, 2:17 pm |
| RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | Agent Man | Jun 24, 2009, 2:07 pm |
| Too Old a Cat to be Fooled by a Kitten | Old & Tired | Jun 24, 2009, 1:36 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | Mike | Jun 24, 2009, 1:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | Nugget | Jun 24, 2009, 1:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | Harry | Jun 24, 2009, 11:47 am |
| RE: RE: Mr. Obama's question | Ratemaker | Jun 24, 2009, 10:06 am |
| RE: Mr. Obama's question | Harry | Jun 24, 2009, 9:50 am |
| Mr. Obama's question | Ratemaker | Jun 24, 2009, 8:12 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: Mr. Obama's question
The answer to why a government program could drive them out of business is that the government program has no profit motive, and no solvency mandate. Backed by the taxation and debt-issuance powers of the federal government, a federal program has no need to reflect the actual cost of issuing the coverage.
When (not if -- politicians are involved) the decision-makers behind pricing the federal program decide that free-market prices are too high, they have the power to undercut the private sector's market-driven prices for an indefinite period of time without threatening the existence of the program. In short, a government program has the capability to "Wal-Mart" the private sector out of business.
In my humble opinion, the only role for a government program is that of a residual market. Even that has its risks, though. Look at Citizen's in Florida.