Home > Talkback
Texas / South Central News

Viewing comments for:

Judge in La. Rules in Favor of Insurance Companies in Flood Lawsuit

Texas / South Central News • May 22, 2006
Insurance companies are not responsible for hurricane-related flood damage if homeowners carry coverage only for windstorms, a federal judge in Louisiana has ruled in a lawsuit over dispute claims ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Here come de judge...

Posted On: May 22, 2006, 1:35 pm CDT
Posted By: Ray
Comment:
I must admire Judge Haik. Admitting that he's not a great fan of insurance companies but still ruling that the insurance contract spelled out what the covered perils are and people shouldn't expect to get coverage they didn't pay for. An honest and unbiased (as far as his decision went) judge is refreshing.
Subject Posted By Posted On
fLOOD iNSURANCE PROGRAM FEMALE ADJUSTER
May 31, 2006, 9:31 pm
RE: Wind vs Water - When water (rain, snow, etc) IS covered. ClaimHawk
May 24, 2006, 5:37 pm
Wind vs Water Enough Already
May 24, 2006, 3:25 pm
To Mark - True Indemnification Details Absolutely Do Matter Roger Poe
May 24, 2006, 12:52 pm
RE: To Ray - Brief Commentary Can Avoid Reasoning On Things Mark
May 23, 2006, 11:19 am
To Ray - Brief Commentary Can Avoid Reasoning On Things Roger Poe
May 23, 2006, 9:31 am
RE: To Mark - How About Another Viewpiont Ray
May 23, 2006, 8:01 am
To Mark - How About Another Viewpiont Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 7:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Cover Mark
May 22, 2006, 5:29 pm
RE: RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 5:05 pm
RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Cut the Crud
May 22, 2006, 2:41 pm
To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 2:03 pm
Here come de judge... Ray
May 22, 2006, 1:35 pm
Well? Cut The Crud
May 22, 2006, 12:45 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.