Texas / South Central News

Viewing comments for:

Judge in La. Rules in Favor of Insurance Companies in Flood Lawsuit

Texas / South Central News • May 22, 2006
Insurance companies are not responsible for hurricane-related flood damage if homeowners carry coverage only for windstorms, a federal judge in Louisiana has ruled in a lawsuit over dispute claims ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: Wind vs Water - When water (rain, snow, etc) IS covered.

Posted On: May 24, 2006, 5:37 pm CDT
Posted By: ClaimHawk
Comment:
State Farm homeowners Policy 2006

Section One - Losses Insured

1. Fire or lightning.

2. Windstorm or hail. This peril does not include loss to property contained in a building caused by rain, snow, sleet,sand or dust.

THIS LIMITATION DOES NOT APPLY WHEN* the direct force of wind or hail damages the the building causing an opening in a roof or wall and the rain, snow, sleet sand or dust enters through this opening."

3. Explosion.

4. Riot or Civil commotion.

5-16. Review a policy for those details.

'Whether driven by rain or not', and 'wind created openings' that allow wind driven rain to enter a property, are two different sets of 'incident' circumstances.

Wind does create opportunity for moisture damage loss to be covered.

*Capitalization added for emphasis.
Subject Posted By Posted On
fLOOD iNSURANCE PROGRAM FEMALE ADJUSTER
May 31, 2006, 9:31 pm
RE: Wind vs Water - When water (rain, snow, etc) IS covered. ClaimHawk
May 24, 2006, 5:37 pm
Wind vs Water Enough Already
May 24, 2006, 3:25 pm
To Mark - True Indemnification Details Absolutely Do Matter Roger Poe
May 24, 2006, 12:52 pm
RE: To Ray - Brief Commentary Can Avoid Reasoning On Things Mark
May 23, 2006, 11:19 am
To Ray - Brief Commentary Can Avoid Reasoning On Things Roger Poe
May 23, 2006, 9:31 am
RE: To Mark - How About Another Viewpiont Ray
May 23, 2006, 8:01 am
To Mark - How About Another Viewpiont Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 7:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Cover Mark
May 22, 2006, 5:29 pm
RE: RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 5:05 pm
RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Cut the Crud
May 22, 2006, 2:41 pm
To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 2:03 pm
Here come de judge... Ray
May 22, 2006, 1:35 pm
Well? Cut The Crud
May 22, 2006, 12:45 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.