Texas / South Central News
Viewing comments for:
Class Action Suit Filed in New Orleans Against 15 Homeowners Insurers
Texas / South Central News • June 1, 2006
A class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on May 24, 2006, on behalf of Greater New Orleans Metropolitan Area homeowners insurance ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Full disclosure | Kim David | Apr 9, 2009, 1:51 am |
| Full disclosure | PRL | Sep 26, 2007, 8:16 am |
| RE: ClaimHawk LL | Kimi David | Jun 12, 2006, 5:44 pm |
| ClaimHawk | Irene | Jun 8, 2006, 8:39 am |
| Kim & Irene | ClaimHawk | Jun 7, 2006, 9:41 pm |
| RE: RE: We The People-Stand Together-Help Each Other | Kim David | Jun 6, 2006, 3:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Help from an unexpected source | Irene | Jun 6, 2006, 8:57 am |
| RE: Help from an unexpected source | LL | Jun 5, 2006, 9:29 pm |
| Help from an unexpected source | Irene | Jun 5, 2006, 3:09 pm |
| LL - Short ,cold, callous remarks only hurt you, not others. | ClaimHawk | Jun 4, 2006, 9:36 am |
| RE: We The People-Stand Together-Help Each Other | LL | Jun 2, 2006, 10:27 pm |
| We The People-Stand Together-Help Each Other | KIM DAVID | Jun 2, 2006, 6:15 pm |
| RE: FEMA Should Sell Hurricane Ins. Wind and/or Water Damag | Kimi David | Jun 2, 2006, 5:52 pm |
| FEMA Should Sell Hurricane Ins. Wind and/or Water Damage | FCASCPCU | Jun 2, 2006, 4:44 pm |
| FEMA Should Sell Hurricane Ins. Wind and/or Water Damage | Kimi David | Jun 2, 2006, 2:44 pm |
| RE: What's to come... | Plymn | Jun 2, 2006, 1:13 pm |
| "Unfairly" excessive? | FCASCPCU | Jun 2, 2006, 10:02 am |
| Is ignoring relevent evidence good faith conduct? | ClaimHawk | Jun 1, 2006, 5:58 pm |
| What's to come... | BWR | Jun 1, 2006, 5:00 pm |
| RE: RE: What else? | The Public | Jun 1, 2006, 4:13 pm |
| RE: RE: What else? | Sam | Jun 1, 2006, 3:29 pm |
| RE: What else? | Give the public what it wants! | Jun 1, 2006, 2:02 pm |
| RE: What else? | Tom | Jun 1, 2006, 1:45 pm |
| What else? | Sam | Jun 1, 2006, 1:38 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: What else?
All this is going to do is to delay payments of claims for years, if you consider discovery, trial and appeals. The companies are not going to roll over and pay hundreds of millions of dollars for an excluded cause of loss, especially when you consider that no premium was ever collected.
The recent rulings in federal court in Mississippi clearly uphold the so-called "flood exclusion", and there's no reason to believe that a court in a neighboring state will reach a totally opposite conclusion.