Texas / South Central News
Viewing comments for:
Wind or Water? Victims Got Conflicting Info on What Caused Damage
Texas / South Central News April 13, 2007
A man who sued Allstate Insurance Co. after losing his home to Hurricane Katrina lashed out April 11 at the insurance industry's position that damage from a hurricane's storm surge is excluded ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Like you have me on ignore Joe ;) | Jewel | Apr 24, 2007, 10:40 am |
| My quality of life has | adjusterjoe | Apr 24, 2007, 10:24 am |
| Points to Ponder on the flip side | Jewel | Apr 24, 2007, 8:48 am |
| Pot meet kettle... | Jewel | Apr 23, 2007, 3:36 pm |
| RE: RE: The truth (follow up) | adjusterjoe | Apr 23, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| RE: The truth (follow up) | Palican | Apr 23, 2007, 1:29 pm |
| Hope... What was | Jewel | Apr 23, 2007, 7:52 am |
| RE: I will put this on an elementary | Hope | Apr 22, 2007, 12:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Sam | Mary B. | Apr 20, 2007, 1:30 pm |
| RE: RE: Keep writing | David | Apr 20, 2007, 10:40 am |
| RE: Keep writing | adjusterjoe | Apr 20, 2007, 10:04 am |
| Keep writing | David | Apr 20, 2007, 9:44 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) | adjusterjoe | Apr 20, 2007, 9:13 am |
| RE: RE: Check it out... | David | Apr 20, 2007, 8:48 am |
| RE: Check it out... | sam | Apr 20, 2007, 8:19 am |
| Check it out... | Sam | Apr 20, 2007, 8:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) | David | Apr 20, 2007, 7:51 am |
| Hey David | Jewel | Apr 20, 2007, 7:50 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 10:16 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 10:08 pm |
| RE: RE: The truth (follow up) | David | Apr 19, 2007, 9:49 pm |
| RE: The truth | David | Apr 19, 2007, 9:10 pm |
| The truth | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Sam | David | Apr 19, 2007, 5:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 4:27 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... | Sam | Apr 19, 2007, 3:57 pm |
| RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 3:55 pm |
| RE: It is | Jewel | Apr 19, 2007, 3:42 pm |
| RE: Keeping to the point of the article... | Sam | Apr 19, 2007, 3:32 pm |
| It is | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 3:30 pm |
| RE: RE: Sam | Jewel | Apr 19, 2007, 2:47 pm |
| RE: Sam | David | Apr 19, 2007, 2:15 pm |
| Sam | adjusternut dba adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 2:10 pm |
| RE: Keeping to the point of the article... | David | Apr 19, 2007, 12:57 pm |
| Now We Know | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 12:57 pm |
| Keeping to the point of the article... | Jewel | Apr 19, 2007, 10:16 am |
| Sam | adjusterjoe | Apr 19, 2007, 9:55 am |
| RE: RE: Now We Know | David | Apr 18, 2007, 5:43 pm |
| RE: Now We Know | Jewel | Apr 18, 2007, 1:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Now We Know | Sam | Apr 18, 2007, 12:28 pm |
| RE: Now We Know | Pelican | Apr 18, 2007, 12:12 pm |
| Now We Know | Sam | Apr 18, 2007, 11:51 am |
| Wow! I am the stupidest person Joe has | Jewel | Apr 18, 2007, 8:11 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Temblor | Apr 18, 2007, 5:43 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | adjusterjoe | Apr 17, 2007, 11:29 pm |
| Chad | adjusterjoe | Apr 17, 2007, 11:24 pm |
| I have NEVER | adjusterjoe | Apr 17, 2007, 11:14 pm |
| Joe, long time no post... | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 3:46 pm |
| RE: Joe, cut back on the joe | steve o. | Apr 17, 2007, 2:37 pm |
| RE: | Mary B. | Apr 17, 2007, 2:30 pm |
| RE: As I have stated before, Jewell | Mary B | Apr 17, 2007, 2:23 pm |
| RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | David | Apr 17, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe | temblor | Apr 17, 2007, 1:31 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe | David | Apr 17, 2007, 1:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe | chad balaamaba | Apr 17, 2007, 11:53 am |
| fakeadjusterjoeknowitall | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 11:52 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Temblor | Apr 17, 2007, 11:42 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | adjusterjoe | Apr 17, 2007, 11:35 am |
| RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Temblor | Apr 17, 2007, 11:17 am |
| RE: Joe, cut back on the joe | adjusterjoe | Apr 17, 2007, 10:48 am |
| Joe, cut back on the joe | Chad Balaamaba | Apr 17, 2007, 9:41 am |
| Still | adjusterjoe | Apr 17, 2007, 9:29 am |
| RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 9:02 am |
| RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Temblor | Apr 17, 2007, 8:49 am |
| RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 8:30 am |
| RE: 8 BALL... Oops! | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 8:28 am |
| Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Temblor | Apr 17, 2007, 8:28 am |
| 8 BALL... | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 8:27 am |
| RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 8:17 am |
| Joe makes things up, not Jewel | Jewel | Apr 17, 2007, 8:11 am |
| Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Temblor | Apr 17, 2007, 6:30 am |
| Lott should have bought excess flood | LL | Apr 16, 2007, 9:56 pm |
| And they still | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 9:30 pm |
| It is futile | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 9:27 pm |
| RE: Sorry for double entry | David | Apr 16, 2007, 8:21 pm |
| "8 BALLS" response | David | Apr 16, 2007, 8:20 pm |
| Impossible | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 6:08 pm |
| RE: Peace in our time between Joe and Jewell | David | Apr 16, 2007, 5:52 pm |
| Peace in our time between Joe and Jewell | James Carter | Apr 16, 2007, 4:32 pm |
| RE: Tremblor | Temblor | Apr 16, 2007, 4:06 pm |
| RE: ... | David | Apr 16, 2007, 4:05 pm |
| RE: ... | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 3:58 pm |
| ... | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:52 pm |
| RE: RE: You have to be | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| Tremblor | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 3:49 pm |
| As I have stated before, Jewell | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 3:43 pm |
| RE: RE: You have to be | Temblor | Apr 16, 2007, 3:41 pm |
| RE: You have to be | Temblor | Apr 16, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: adjusterjoe doesn't answer your questions | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| adjusterjoe doesn't answer your questions | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:36 pm |
| RE: You have to be | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:31 pm |
| You have to be | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 3:21 pm |
| Way to skirt the issue... | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| RE: I will put this on an elementary | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| I will put this on an elementary | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 3:08 pm |
| Adjusterjoe, let's try this again! | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 2:39 pm |
| RE: RE: Wind or Water | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 2:12 pm |
| RE: Wind or Water | temblor | Apr 16, 2007, 12:41 pm |
| RE: Wind or Water | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 12:23 pm |
| Wind or Water | temblor | Apr 16, 2007, 11:56 am |
| Tremblor | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 10:01 am |
| RE: NFIP eligibility | Bill | Apr 13, 2007, 8:43 pm |
| NFIP eligibility | LL | Apr 13, 2007, 7:08 pm |
| Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | temblor | Apr 13, 2007, 4:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Tracy | Apr 13, 2007, 3:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | temblor | Apr 13, 2007, 3:01 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: excess flood coverage is available... | temblor | Apr 13, 2007, 2:55 pm |
| RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Chad Balaamaba | Apr 13, 2007, 2:54 pm |
| RE: RE: excess flood coverage is available... | JW | Apr 13, 2007, 2:42 pm |
| RE: excess flood coverage is available... | Sam | Apr 13, 2007, 2:35 pm |
| excess flood coverage is available... | Chad Balaamaba | Apr 13, 2007, 2:26 pm |
| RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Inquiring Minds Want to Know | Apr 13, 2007, 2:25 pm |
| Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. | Temblor | Apr 13, 2007, 1:49 pm |
| RE: Value of home? | Sam | Apr 13, 2007, 1:47 pm |
| Value of home? | JW | Apr 13, 2007, 1:27 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Now We Know
Both the insured and engineer have some answering to do. The insured attempted to claim something which was not on the policy and the engineer, whether there was or not, gave the appearance of impropriety. The jury, as is usually the case sided with teh deep pockets.
I do have to agree that the insured should have to repay NFIP for all damages to the main floor level and above as it has now been adjudicated that flood was not the cause. There are many times covered in the space under the elevated risk which could approach six figures. I have worked many flood losses where there were substantial damages covered below the main floor.