Texas / South Central News

Viewing comments for:

Wind or Water? Victims Got Conflicting Info on What Caused Damage

Texas / South Central News • April 13, 2007
A man who sued Allstate Insurance Co. after losing his home to Hurricane Katrina lashed out April 11 at the insurance industry's position that damage from a hurricane's storm surge is excluded ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: The truth

Posted On: April 19, 2007, 6:03 pm CDT
Posted By: adjusterjoe
Comment:
David:

I have spoken only the truth. I have yet to get any answers or rebuttal based upon facts from the State Farm apologists like you. When I ask a quetsion, it is answered with a question from the State Farm apologists. Here are the facts.

1. State Farm Denied slab cases 100% without payment. DO NOT ANSWER THIS WITH A QUESTION. IF YOU FEEL IT IS NOT TRUE, PROVIDE PROOF.

2. State Farm has yet to win a slab case.

3. State Farm has had punitive awards levied against them in slab cases. Remember punitive damages are only awarded in cases where there is reckless disregard displayed and they are designed TO PUNISH this behavior.

4. Ed Rust, State Farm CEO, was brought before a grand jury and before the grand jury could bring forth an indictment, he agreed that State Farm would re-evaluate primarily 1000-1200 "SLAB CASES" but 35,000 overall.

5. State Farm has lost a tornado case in OKLA for their questionable use of engineers. This case had a punitive damage award attached. Now there are charges of a similar nature in Mississippi.

6. The only reason the questions of wind/flood have not been exposed to the extent they are now is due to the prior hurricanes, have not involved flooding to the extent of Katrina.

7. I personally have paid slab cases for wind damage, so for you to say I would have done the same as State Farm is just a LIE.

The only responses I have had from the State Farm apologists like you is that the courts are wrong. Hey, if you don't want to live by the law of the land, go to Iraq or some other country. This is the system we use in this ocuntry and if your only repsonse is the courts are wrong, then you have no rebuttal for the truth. I know you will not be able to rebutt the truth posted here, but I look foreward to hearing your weak atempts to justify the courts are wrong.
Subject Posted By Posted On
Like you have me on ignore Joe ;) Jewel
Apr 24, 2007, 10:40 am
My quality of life has adjusterjoe
Apr 24, 2007, 10:24 am
Points to Ponder on the flip side Jewel
Apr 24, 2007, 8:48 am
Pot meet kettle... Jewel
Apr 23, 2007, 3:36 pm
RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 23, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: The truth (follow up) Palican
Apr 23, 2007, 1:29 pm
Hope... What was Jewel
Apr 23, 2007, 7:52 am
RE: I will put this on an elementary Hope
Apr 22, 2007, 12:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sam Mary B.
Apr 20, 2007, 1:30 pm
RE: RE: Keep writing David
Apr 20, 2007, 10:40 am
RE: Keep writing adjusterjoe
Apr 20, 2007, 10:04 am
Keep writing David
Apr 20, 2007, 9:44 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 20, 2007, 9:13 am
RE: RE: Check it out... David
Apr 20, 2007, 8:48 am
RE: Check it out... sam
Apr 20, 2007, 8:19 am
Check it out... Sam
Apr 20, 2007, 8:17 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) David
Apr 20, 2007, 7:51 am
Hey David Jewel
Apr 20, 2007, 7:50 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 10:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 10:08 pm
RE: RE: The truth (follow up) David
Apr 19, 2007, 9:49 pm
RE: The truth David
Apr 19, 2007, 9:10 pm
The truth adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 6:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: Sam David
Apr 19, 2007, 5:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 4:27 pm
RE: RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... Sam
Apr 19, 2007, 3:57 pm
RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 3:55 pm
RE: It is Jewel
Apr 19, 2007, 3:42 pm
RE: Keeping to the point of the article... Sam
Apr 19, 2007, 3:32 pm
It is adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 3:30 pm
RE: RE: Sam Jewel
Apr 19, 2007, 2:47 pm
RE: Sam David
Apr 19, 2007, 2:15 pm
Sam adjusternut dba adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 2:10 pm
RE: Keeping to the point of the article... David
Apr 19, 2007, 12:57 pm
Now We Know adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 12:57 pm
Keeping to the point of the article... Jewel
Apr 19, 2007, 10:16 am
Sam adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 9:55 am
RE: RE: Now We Know David
Apr 18, 2007, 5:43 pm
RE: Now We Know Jewel
Apr 18, 2007, 1:32 pm
RE: RE: Now We Know Sam
Apr 18, 2007, 12:28 pm
RE: Now We Know Pelican
Apr 18, 2007, 12:12 pm
Now We Know Sam
Apr 18, 2007, 11:51 am
Wow! I am the stupidest person Joe has Jewel
Apr 18, 2007, 8:11 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 18, 2007, 5:43 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:29 pm
Chad adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:24 pm
I have NEVER adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:14 pm
Joe, long time no post... Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 3:46 pm
RE: Joe, cut back on the joe steve o.
Apr 17, 2007, 2:37 pm
RE: Mary B.
Apr 17, 2007, 2:30 pm
RE: As I have stated before, Jewell Mary B
Apr 17, 2007, 2:23 pm
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. David
Apr 17, 2007, 1:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 1:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe David
Apr 17, 2007, 1:15 pm
RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe chad balaamaba
Apr 17, 2007, 11:53 am
fakeadjusterjoeknowitall Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 11:42 am
RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:35 am
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 11:17 am
RE: Joe, cut back on the joe adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 10:48 am
Joe, cut back on the joe Chad Balaamaba
Apr 17, 2007, 9:41 am
Still adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 9:29 am
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 9:02 am
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 8:49 am
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:30 am
RE: 8 BALL... Oops! Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:28 am
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 8:28 am
8 BALL... Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:27 am
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:17 am
Joe makes things up, not Jewel Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:11 am
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 6:30 am
Lott should have bought excess flood LL
Apr 16, 2007, 9:56 pm
And they still adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 9:30 pm
It is futile adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 9:27 pm
RE: Sorry for double entry David
Apr 16, 2007, 8:21 pm
"8 BALLS" response David
Apr 16, 2007, 8:20 pm
Impossible adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 6:08 pm
RE: Peace in our time between Joe and Jewell David
Apr 16, 2007, 5:52 pm
Peace in our time between Joe and Jewell James Carter
Apr 16, 2007, 4:32 pm
RE: Tremblor Temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 4:06 pm
RE: ... David
Apr 16, 2007, 4:05 pm
RE: ... adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:58 pm
... Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:52 pm
RE: RE: You have to be adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:51 pm
Tremblor adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:49 pm
As I have stated before, Jewell adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:43 pm
RE: RE: You have to be Temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 3:41 pm
RE: You have to be Temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 3:38 pm
RE: adjusterjoe doesn't answer your questions Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:38 pm
adjusterjoe doesn't answer your questions Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:36 pm
RE: You have to be Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:31 pm
You have to be adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:21 pm
Way to skirt the issue... Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: I will put this on an elementary Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:14 pm
I will put this on an elementary adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:08 pm
Adjusterjoe, let's try this again! Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 2:39 pm
RE: RE: Wind or Water adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 2:12 pm
RE: Wind or Water temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 12:41 pm
RE: Wind or Water adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 12:23 pm
Wind or Water temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 11:56 am
Tremblor adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 10:01 am
RE: NFIP eligibility Bill
Apr 13, 2007, 8:43 pm
NFIP eligibility LL
Apr 13, 2007, 7:08 pm
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 4:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Tracy
Apr 13, 2007, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: excess flood coverage is available... temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 2:55 pm
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Chad Balaamaba
Apr 13, 2007, 2:54 pm
RE: RE: excess flood coverage is available... JW
Apr 13, 2007, 2:42 pm
RE: excess flood coverage is available... Sam
Apr 13, 2007, 2:35 pm
excess flood coverage is available... Chad Balaamaba
Apr 13, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Inquiring Minds Want to Know
Apr 13, 2007, 2:25 pm
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 1:49 pm
RE: Value of home? Sam
Apr 13, 2007, 1:47 pm
Value of home? JW
Apr 13, 2007, 1:27 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.