Texas / South Central News

Viewing comments for:

Wind or Water? Victims Got Conflicting Info on What Caused Damage

Texas / South Central News • April 13, 2007
A man who sued Allstate Insurance Co. after losing his home to Hurricane Katrina lashed out April 11 at the insurance industry's position that damage from a hurricane's storm surge is excluded ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: The truth

Posted On: April 19, 2007, 9:10 pm CDT
Posted By: David
Comment:
Joe,

Here are the answer's to your questions that I know of.

1) Since I don't work for State Farm it would be hard for me to answer this question. I do know for a fact that of all the Engineers reports they ordered (likely in excess of 10,000) they paid on over 70%. I guess by your numbers, the only ones they haven't paid are the one's you cited here. So, let's kick the question back to you, Do you know for a fact they've denied 100% of all slab cases? Could a few of these 70% claims paid for wind damage be slab cases? You really don't now. I don't want to hear some independent adjuster line of crap. You CAN'T say for sure that all slab cases were denied without payment.

2) Not sure about this question either, but I can say, not all the slab cases have been heard.

3) State Farm and Allstate along with some others (when this is all over) will have punitative damages awarded against them.

4) This was a ploy by Trent Lott who was pissed off at State Farm. Don't be nieve enough to think he didn't have something to do with this. Just like your great Senator put wording in a recent bill not long ago that Dept. of Homeland Security would oversee the handling of the claims under the NFIP. That is what I want my Security Dept overlooking is our flood claims. Way to go Lott.....keep wasting our time and money.

5) I know some of State Farm's use of Engineering Firms has come into question. Just another political ploy by the plantiff's to give their side added advantage in court. You can make just about anything appear how you want it too.

6) This is really a sad argument for the people in south Mississippi. Basically, they are being told since it didn't effect Lott's house then he really doesn't care. What about all the other people in the so called small hurricances. Sorry, you don't count since the hurricane wasn't big enough. A storm surge is a storm surge whether it's 2ft or 20ft. But the people in Mississippi want to make up the rules as they go along. This is a reason why State Farm and other insurers will refrain from writing any new business or may pull out of the state all together.

7) For you to make this statement tells me you did not read the case in detail that I had asked you too. Each case is handled on it's own individual merits and must be investigated that way. Since you are a independent adjuster, you likely would have very little investigation into whether to pay a claim. Likely, the claim is investigated by the actual company reps who ascertain all the information and then make a descion. So with that being the case, you really don't know why the slab cases are denied (which you say they are) outside the fact they are denied.

Now, what is your hatred towards the largest insurer in the US. Apparently you are very much in the minority. If they are such an awful company then why do to insurer so many people. They take on risks (like coastal communities) that most others don't want to touch. They don't want to touch because financially they can't afford too. I would venture to guess State Farm would love to cover Hurricane (storm surge) among other perils that would directly effect the coast with the proper premium. The insurance policy was approved by the Insurance Commissioner as it was written. State Farm was allocated a premium for that contract. Now they are being told they will have to allocated tens of millions more dollars without actually charging the premium. The people of coastal mississippi know what their insurance covers. Some got flood insurance most did not. Not because of their inability to protect their property they want to blame someone else and why not State Farm...They have money....all i can say, is things have a tendancy to come full circle. I look forward to hearing your next ***** session in a few months and years about how outrageous the insurance premiums are in your state and you call remember back to KATRINA....
Subject Posted By Posted On
Like you have me on ignore Joe ;) Jewel
Apr 24, 2007, 10:40 am
My quality of life has adjusterjoe
Apr 24, 2007, 10:24 am
Points to Ponder on the flip side Jewel
Apr 24, 2007, 8:48 am
Pot meet kettle... Jewel
Apr 23, 2007, 3:36 pm
RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 23, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: The truth (follow up) Palican
Apr 23, 2007, 1:29 pm
Hope... What was Jewel
Apr 23, 2007, 7:52 am
RE: I will put this on an elementary Hope
Apr 22, 2007, 12:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sam Mary B.
Apr 20, 2007, 1:30 pm
RE: RE: Keep writing David
Apr 20, 2007, 10:40 am
RE: Keep writing adjusterjoe
Apr 20, 2007, 10:04 am
Keep writing David
Apr 20, 2007, 9:44 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 20, 2007, 9:13 am
RE: RE: Check it out... David
Apr 20, 2007, 8:48 am
RE: Check it out... sam
Apr 20, 2007, 8:19 am
Check it out... Sam
Apr 20, 2007, 8:17 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) David
Apr 20, 2007, 7:51 am
Hey David Jewel
Apr 20, 2007, 7:50 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 10:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: The truth (follow up) adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 10:08 pm
RE: RE: The truth (follow up) David
Apr 19, 2007, 9:49 pm
RE: The truth David
Apr 19, 2007, 9:10 pm
The truth adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 6:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: Sam David
Apr 19, 2007, 5:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 4:27 pm
RE: RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... Sam
Apr 19, 2007, 3:57 pm
RE: RE: Keeping to the point of the article... adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 3:55 pm
RE: It is Jewel
Apr 19, 2007, 3:42 pm
RE: Keeping to the point of the article... Sam
Apr 19, 2007, 3:32 pm
It is adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 3:30 pm
RE: RE: Sam Jewel
Apr 19, 2007, 2:47 pm
RE: Sam David
Apr 19, 2007, 2:15 pm
Sam adjusternut dba adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 2:10 pm
RE: Keeping to the point of the article... David
Apr 19, 2007, 12:57 pm
Now We Know adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 12:57 pm
Keeping to the point of the article... Jewel
Apr 19, 2007, 10:16 am
Sam adjusterjoe
Apr 19, 2007, 9:55 am
RE: RE: Now We Know David
Apr 18, 2007, 5:43 pm
RE: Now We Know Jewel
Apr 18, 2007, 1:32 pm
RE: RE: Now We Know Sam
Apr 18, 2007, 12:28 pm
RE: Now We Know Pelican
Apr 18, 2007, 12:12 pm
Now We Know Sam
Apr 18, 2007, 11:51 am
Wow! I am the stupidest person Joe has Jewel
Apr 18, 2007, 8:11 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 18, 2007, 5:43 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:29 pm
Chad adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:24 pm
I have NEVER adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:14 pm
Joe, long time no post... Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 3:46 pm
RE: Joe, cut back on the joe steve o.
Apr 17, 2007, 2:37 pm
RE: Mary B.
Apr 17, 2007, 2:30 pm
RE: As I have stated before, Jewell Mary B
Apr 17, 2007, 2:23 pm
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. David
Apr 17, 2007, 1:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 1:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe David
Apr 17, 2007, 1:15 pm
RE: RE: Joe, cut back on the joe chad balaamaba
Apr 17, 2007, 11:53 am
fakeadjusterjoeknowitall Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 11:42 am
RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 11:35 am
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 11:17 am
RE: Joe, cut back on the joe adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 10:48 am
Joe, cut back on the joe Chad Balaamaba
Apr 17, 2007, 9:41 am
Still adjusterjoe
Apr 17, 2007, 9:29 am
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 9:02 am
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 8:49 am
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:30 am
RE: 8 BALL... Oops! Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:28 am
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 8:28 am
8 BALL... Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:27 am
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:17 am
Joe makes things up, not Jewel Jewel
Apr 17, 2007, 8:11 am
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 17, 2007, 6:30 am
Lott should have bought excess flood LL
Apr 16, 2007, 9:56 pm
And they still adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 9:30 pm
It is futile adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 9:27 pm
RE: Sorry for double entry David
Apr 16, 2007, 8:21 pm
"8 BALLS" response David
Apr 16, 2007, 8:20 pm
Impossible adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 6:08 pm
RE: Peace in our time between Joe and Jewell David
Apr 16, 2007, 5:52 pm
Peace in our time between Joe and Jewell James Carter
Apr 16, 2007, 4:32 pm
RE: Tremblor Temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 4:06 pm
RE: ... David
Apr 16, 2007, 4:05 pm
RE: ... adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:58 pm
... Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:52 pm
RE: RE: You have to be adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:51 pm
Tremblor adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:49 pm
As I have stated before, Jewell adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:43 pm
RE: RE: You have to be Temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 3:41 pm
RE: You have to be Temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 3:38 pm
RE: adjusterjoe doesn't answer your questions Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:38 pm
adjusterjoe doesn't answer your questions Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:36 pm
RE: You have to be Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:31 pm
You have to be adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:21 pm
Way to skirt the issue... Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: I will put this on an elementary Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:14 pm
I will put this on an elementary adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:08 pm
Adjusterjoe, let's try this again! Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 2:39 pm
RE: RE: Wind or Water adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 2:12 pm
RE: Wind or Water temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 12:41 pm
RE: Wind or Water adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 12:23 pm
Wind or Water temblor
Apr 16, 2007, 11:56 am
Tremblor adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 10:01 am
RE: NFIP eligibility Bill
Apr 13, 2007, 8:43 pm
NFIP eligibility LL
Apr 13, 2007, 7:08 pm
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 4:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Tracy
Apr 13, 2007, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: excess flood coverage is available... temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 2:55 pm
RE: RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Chad Balaamaba
Apr 13, 2007, 2:54 pm
RE: RE: excess flood coverage is available... JW
Apr 13, 2007, 2:42 pm
RE: excess flood coverage is available... Sam
Apr 13, 2007, 2:35 pm
excess flood coverage is available... Chad Balaamaba
Apr 13, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Inquiring Minds Want to Know
Apr 13, 2007, 2:25 pm
Wind or Water? Conflicting Info. Temblor
Apr 13, 2007, 1:49 pm
RE: Value of home? Sam
Apr 13, 2007, 1:47 pm
Value of home? JW
Apr 13, 2007, 1:27 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.