Texas / South Central News

Viewing comments for:

Has Tort Reform Worked Too Well in Texas?

Texas / South Central News • December 7, 2007
The Texas Legislature enacted tort reform measures in 2003 that among other things placed a $250,000 cap on non-economic damage awards against individual health care practitioners, a $250,000 cap ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: Not for Nothing....

Posted On: December 7, 2007, 2:22 pm CST
Posted By: Bill Reed
Comment:
And how many "drunk and careless" doctors do you think are running around the OR? Most med mal cases don't come close to meeting the standard for malpractice. People are simply angry that they didn't get the outcome they wanted. Doctors and surgical outcomes aren't perfect. Even if a doctor makes a mistake, I don't believe he/she should be penalized for it and it certainly isn't malpractice. 99.9% of medical professional do the absolute best they can for their patients. That has to be good enough. Check out the following definition of malpractice to put this into perspective:


mal·prac·tice /mælˈpræktɪs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[mal-prak-tis] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. Law. failure of a professional person, as a physician or lawyer, to render proper services through reprehensible ignorance or negligence or through criminal intent, esp. when injury or loss follows.
2. any improper, negligent practice; misconduct or misuse.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... adjusterjoe
Dec 10, 2007, 12:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... lastbat
Dec 10, 2007, 10:28 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... adjusterjoe
Dec 10, 2007, 9:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... Hipstan
Dec 10, 2007, 9:46 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... adjusterjoe
Dec 10, 2007, 9:14 am
RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... Hipstan
Dec 9, 2007, 12:04 pm
RE: Bill Reed's post California ExPat
Dec 7, 2007, 5:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... Mr. Obvious
Dec 7, 2007, 4:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... FOWIF
Dec 7, 2007, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: Not for Nothing.... Bill Reed
Dec 7, 2007, 2:22 pm
RE: No Need for Insurance????? N. Judge
Dec 7, 2007, 1:46 pm
RE: Not for Nothing.... N. Judge
Dec 7, 2007, 1:45 pm
No Need for Insurance????? Bill
Dec 7, 2007, 1:40 pm
Not for Nothing.... Little Frog
Dec 7, 2007, 12:37 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.