Texas / South Central News

Viewing comments for:

Successive Hurricanes: Potential Windfall for Insureds?

Texas / South Central News • November 24, 2008
The 2008 hurricane season came very close to presenting, on a large scale, the potential quandary caused by successive losses. On Sept.1, 2008, Hurricane Gustav came ashore and caused substantial ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: I Disagree

Posted On: November 25, 2008, 9:27 am CST
Posted By: Lowell
Comment:
Structure damaged, but still standing...roof and walls above water line are windstorm losses...water damage is inside and up to water line...client has both policies...so far no flood money paid and only partial windstorm for roof...can't callem...can't email em...adjusters not experienced did bad jobs clients have to hire own independents who charge 10-15% to re adjust...Now, on those structures completely gone by surge, should they get windstorm check or not? should flood deduct what would have been windstorm had structure survived? Adjusters on these claims minimally experienced in many cases due to sheer numbers that have to be adjusted...quite a mess...Flood and windstorm should be combined in some way and the premium should be risk based, not taxpayer or govt backed, except as last resort, and then premiums adjust for future further losses...insuring living and working on the coast cannot be insurance welfare...but for now pay and fix later
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: I Disagree Lowell
Nov 25, 2008, 9:27 am
RE: I Disagree wudchuck
Nov 24, 2008, 3:29 pm
I Disagree Actuary
Nov 24, 2008, 12:37 pm
RE: Hold it Proximo
Nov 24, 2008, 11:39 am
Hold it Lowell
Nov 24, 2008, 10:18 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.