Home > Talkback
Texas / South Central News

Viewing comments for:

Texas Supreme Court Considers Auto Policy Exclusions Case

Texas / South Central News • December 1, 2008
The Texas Supreme Court must decide if an Ohio insurance company should pay in the case of a boy injured by a driver who was speeding away from police. Richard Gibbons was evading San Marcos, ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: Intentional vs Increased Probability

Posted On: December 2, 2008, 10:49 am CST
Posted By: Dread
Comment:
First off, attempting to evade the police is a criminal offense. It would be appropriate to forfeit your coverage when engaged in an illegal activity. Secondly, engaging in a high speed chase is a risk that isn't anticipated when the policy was issued. The morons in our society need to learn that when you ignore the rules of society, you forfeit your rights.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: Intentional vs Increased Probability KentU
Dec 2, 2008, 3:04 pm
RE: RE: Intentional vs Increased Probability Dread
Dec 2, 2008, 10:49 am
RE: Intentional vs Increased Probability KentU
Dec 1, 2008, 3:38 pm
Clause supporting Nationwide Insurance Laura
Dec 1, 2008, 1:09 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.