Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Bailey Challenges Scruggs: 'Put Up or Shut Up!'
Southeast News March 20, 2006
Recent developments in the Mississippi wind vs. flood case and statements by attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs about having information from one or more whistleblowers are serious allegations and ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: New question, but relates to subject, NO IT DOESN | KATRINA SURVIVOR | Oct 21, 2006, 9:10 pm |
| To: American & Mrs LB | American Woman | Oct 8, 2006, 2:48 am |
| To: American & Mrs LB | American Woman | Oct 8, 2006, 2:46 am |
| America Cries | American Woman | Oct 8, 2006, 2:29 am |
| To: America & Mrs LB | American Woman | Oct 8, 2006, 2:19 am |
| To: America & Mrs LB | American Woman | Oct 8, 2006, 2:07 am |
| TO: WE THE PEOPLE & MRS LB | American Woman | Oct 8, 2006, 2:00 am |
| TO American Woman from Mrs. LB | MRs. LB | Oct 5, 2006, 3:25 am |
| TO MISS ADJUSTER | American Woman | Oct 4, 2006, 12:35 pm |
| RE: Mistaken Identity to American Woman | American Woman | Oct 4, 2006, 12:29 pm |
| To miss adjuster get your facts straight! | Mrs. LB | Oct 4, 2006, 3:43 am |
| Mistaken Identity to American Woman | Mrs. LB | Oct 4, 2006, 2:33 am |
| RE: MrsLB | American Woman | Sep 18, 2006, 12:50 pm |
| RE: MrsLB-good Post | Southern Agent | Sep 12, 2006, 11:52 am |
| MrsLB | miss adjuster | Sep 11, 2006, 7:33 pm |
| RE: RE: New question, but relates to subject, NO IT DOESN | Mrs. LB | Apr 19, 2006, 2:45 am |
| RE: New question, but relates to subject, NO IT DOESN"T | Tired sympathizer | Apr 18, 2006, 12:19 pm |
| New question, but relates to subject | Mrs. L. B. | Apr 18, 2006, 2:46 am |
| 2 Good Men but One is Wrong. | Kim David | Apr 13, 2006, 2:13 pm |
| To: Mrs L Beck | AMERICAN WOMAN | Apr 13, 2006, 2:06 pm |
| RE: RE: TO: INS. BROKER from Mrs L Beck | Mrs.. L.B. | Apr 4, 2006, 2:56 am |
| STAND UP or GET OUT PAY OR LEAVE | AMERICAN WOMAN | Apr 3, 2006, 7:13 pm |
| RE: PUT UP OR SHUT UP | RUSS LOW | Mar 30, 2006, 3:12 am |
| right on, Mke | LL | Mar 28, 2006, 5:32 pm |
| RE: TO: INS. BROKER from Mrs L Beck | Mke from Boston | Mar 28, 2006, 12:41 pm |
| RE: RE: TO Southern Agent: Mrs. LB | drudy | Mar 28, 2006, 8:35 am |
| RE: TO Southern Agent: Mrs. LB | Mrs. LB | Mar 28, 2006, 2:11 am |
| RE: good source of facts/info on our lives- re: MS Gulf Coas | drudy | Mar 27, 2006, 1:13 pm |
| RE: Mrs. LB | Southern Agent | Mar 27, 2006, 12:42 pm |
| good source of facts/info on our lives- re: MS Gulf Coast | Mrs. L. B. | Mar 27, 2006, 3:57 am |
| another diatribe/rant/rage against the machine | Mrs. L. B. | Mar 27, 2006, 3:37 am |
| RE: TO cb from Mrs. L. B | Mike from Boston | Mar 22, 2006, 9:17 pm |
| RE: what is flood? | Carl | Mar 22, 2006, 8:43 pm |
| RE: TO cb from Mrs. L. B | Carl | Mar 22, 2006, 6:02 pm |
| what is flood? | LL | Mar 22, 2006, 5:57 pm |
| RE: TO cb from Mrs. L. B | drudy | Mar 22, 2006, 9:26 am |
| TO cb from Mrs. L. B | Mrs. L. Beck | Mar 22, 2006, 3:14 am |
| TO: INS. BROKER from Mrs L Beck | Mrs. L. | Mar 22, 2006, 2:43 am |
| RE: RE: Dicky Scruggs....H-E-R-O in our eyes | cb | Mar 21, 2006, 3:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Leaving a trail of slime wherever he goes... | Carl | Mar 21, 2006, 11:21 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Dicky Scruggs....H-E-R-O in our eyes | Southern Agent | Mar 21, 2006, 11:06 am |
| RE: RE: Dicky Scruggs....H-E-R-O in our eyes | Ins. Broker | Mar 21, 2006, 10:11 am |
| Re: Insurance Agents | Sheila | Mar 21, 2006, 8:19 am |
| RE: Dicky Scruggs....H-E-R-O in our eyes | Mrs. L. Beck | Mar 21, 2006, 1:53 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Leaving a trail of slime wherever he goes.... | Mar 20, 2006, 10:29 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Leaving a trail of slime wherever he goes.... | Mike from Boston | Mar 20, 2006, 9:58 pm |
| RE: Leaving a trail of slime wherever he goes.... | C. E. Odom | Mar 20, 2006, 9:16 pm |
| RE: Put Up! | C. E. Odom | Mar 20, 2006, 9:03 pm |
| RE: more about Mississippi | Southern Agent | Mar 20, 2006, 3:58 pm |
| Bailey's tossing rhetoric, too | Thing Is | Mar 20, 2006, 3:07 pm |
| Leaving a trail of slime wherever he goes.... | Mike from Boston | Mar 20, 2006, 3:06 pm |
| Put Up! | JR | Mar 20, 2006, 2:59 pm |
| No, Put Up | Sam | Mar 20, 2006, 2:04 pm |
| shut- up! | drudy | Mar 20, 2006, 12:53 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: New question, but relates to subject
The City/County officials, Insurances big wigs, state insurance officials, FEMA, etc have all decided we need to rebuild our homes and make them HIGHER. How high? No one knows yet, so almost no one can rebuild. I can understand homes in flood plains or those that flood on a regular basis might need to go up a tad higher than 8 feet, but why are we ALL possibly being forced to incur yet another cost we can't afford over an issue that is not likely to come up again for many, many years-if ever????
I mean, after you go so high with a house on pilings, it's gonna tip over or fly off in a hurricane even if water doesn't come anywhere near it.
Now, my BIG question is this: If we on the Mississippi Gulf Coast are required to build higher, buy perpetual flood insurance (not an issue with me-I will have it even if I think a sink is going to overflow!), restructure our entire lives, infrastructure, reorganize and combine city governments, etc, they why isn't the entire US COASTLINE from Brownsville, Texas and all Gulf of Mexico coastal areas, and Atlantic regions from Key West all the way up to the Northernmost tip in Maine, going to be required to do the same? They are all as prone to a Catagory 5 hurricane as we are. Could this possibly be discrimination? (And please do remember I am talking about Coastal Mississippi, not New Orleans, which is just a big bowl of filled-in marsh surrounded by water on all sides and obviously weakened levees.)
The stupidity of this jump-start band aid approach is unbelievable. And because FEMA funds will play into helping rebuild our schools (let's face it-the gov't is financially responsible for building about 99% of USA public schools anyway), our less than 3 year old schools will have to be torn down simply because they received approx. 2 feet of water from this freak tidal wave. They also are trying to take, by eminant domain, the one remaining green parcel 50 acre plot left in city limits to build a new school complex. This land is closer to the Gulf by over 1 mile, has very little road access-none of it safe, is next to a major railroad crossing, and would invade an entirely residential area. The schools were all refurbished in the last 8 years, 1 is less than 3 years old, and are on a land tract that will allow them to spread for years. So my dumb idea of the day is...instead of building new schools in a more flood prone and dangerous area at the cost of BILLIONS, why not just put up an 8 foot waterproof wall all around the current area? The schools are cleaned and being phased back into use, the money's been spent, the current site is in a great central location to the area it serves, and we, the dumb butts who just pay taxes and insurance premiums, are broke already.
As I have warned before, if you don't tend to this problem NOW while you have opportunity to do so, the next big storm will wreak so much havoc Katrina will seem like a puff of wind.
Even though I am a bit off track on this issue, I thought it was something that you, as taxpayers and insurance premium payers and sellers, should think about.
God Bless!