Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

State Farm: We're Paying Wind Damage Claims

Southeast News • April 7, 2006
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. is paying for Hurricane Katrina property losses when evidence shows that wind caused the damage, James Burwell, claims manager, wrote in a letter to the ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage 2

Posted On: April 8, 2006, 12:54 pm CDT
Posted By: Roger Poe
Comment:
4-8-2006

A new twist to State Farm and Allstate's hurricane Rita damage UNDER-assessment schemes is to claim that wind debris damage to asphalt / fiberglass roofing system shingles, is not really damage they insure for.

They now claim that when wind borne debris (sand, pebbles, twigs, vegetation, dirt, neighbor's roof granules, etc.) strips off shingles granular surface component, sometimes even down to the fiberglass matting, that that abrasive striping of the shingle...is not (wink-wink) reallllyy shingle damage.

Another (untrue) claim they both are spreading, (Allstate through Pilot Claim Service adjusters), in and around the Beaumont Texas region, and in Florida, is that the tar sealant bond that keeps one shingle attached to the one below it, is also not (wink-wink) reallllyy shingle damage when wind lift breaks the bond.

(Only naive, uneducated and tired policyholders believe, or "accept" that damaged property assessment double-speak nonsense...)

As wind loads break apart a shingle's (factory engineered and wind warrantied) tar sealant bond, and leaves behind debris under the shingles, the heat from the sun commonly causes the debris to become attached to the tar and commonly prohibits the shingles from (thermally) sealing back together...an obvious danger to the home / business structure, and to the future welfare of the inhabitants of the structure...especially along the hurricane prone Gulf Coast.

To help Allstate / Pilot Claim Service and State Farm (permanently?) correct their shingle wind damage assessment errors, and voluntarily reopen untold thousands of claims incorrectly assessed, and to help the general public receive a reasonable shingle roofing system wind damage assessment review from insurance adjusters, the following fresh technical information, received from a credible and proven shingle manufacturer, is provided for the general public;
__________

TECHNICAL BULLETIN - HURRICANE EXPOSURE

The process of detecting and evaluating damage from hurricane exposure is subjective at best, and often everyone involved may offer a different assessment.

Damage can range from wind uplift, shingle loss, broken sealant bonds, granule loss, external sources, and may not be readily apparent.

However, even small amounts of damage can harm the surfacing material, leading to deterioration of the shingles months or years later.

GRANULE LOSS
Regarding damage to the embedded granule surfacing in the asphalt top coating, hurricane wind exposure can result in varying degrees of granule loss.

Hurricane wind exposure loosens the granules, potentially allowing the granules to separate from the coating layer and wash off the roof.

Without the granule surfacing, the asphalt top coating is exposed to ultraviolet radiation from ordinary sunlight and will eventually deteriorate, exposing the fiberglass substrate and creating a leak potential.

If a shingle indicates outward damage, the underlying components may be compromised and affected to some degree.

The extent of granule loss resulting from hurricane exposure is influenced by, but not limited to, the following:

1. Age of the product.
2. Force and duration of winds and wind driven rain.
3. Type and amount of wind driven debris.
4. Orientation and slope of the deck in relation to winds.
5. Amount of foot traffic.

BROKEN SEALANT BONDS
When sealant bonds are broken due to hurricane winds, it is possible, but not likely, for shingles to reseal.

The subsequent strength of resealing, if any, would not be as strong as the initial thermal bond and would be contingent on, but not limited to, the following:

1. Age of the product.
2. Time of year and amount of exposure to ambient temperatures.
3. Length of time before shingles are exposed to subsequent high wind events.
4. Orientation and slope of deck.
5. Stress and strain on the shingles due to exposure to sustained high winds and/or deck movement.
6. Number, placement, type, and length of fasteners.
7. Contamination to the sealant bonds by dirt, debris, or other foreign substance.
8. Condition of the underlying deck or underlying shingles if a roof over.

In accordance with the terms of the limited warranty, there is no coverage for damage caused by hurricanes.

Shingles in hurricane areas will continue to carry the limited warranty for manufacturing defects and remaining limited wind warranty.

Any damage relating to conditions caused by a hurricane, including granule loss, breach of the seals, nail tears and other structural damage, will not be covered by the limited warranty or limited wind warranty at any time.

TB-420 2/24/06
ELK P.O. Box 500 Ennis, TX. 75120
Toll Free - 1-866-355-8324 www.elkcorp.com
__________

Large premiums + large deductibles + large depreciation factors + untrue loss values + irresponsible and life endangering claim loss damage assessment conduct = Minimal claim loss payouts, and Grrrreat!!! 2003, 2004, 2005 "Loss ratio" profits...

Too bad for some insurers, agents, and adjusters, that a thing called 'Market Conduct Examinations', periodically performed by insurance regulatory market conduct examination professionals, and others, is not going to kind to them, or to their market investment support...

Think about that the next time you see a ad from an insurer that wants you to trust them with your family's welfare, and your money.

Make sure they do not (cleverly) steal either...

rogerpoegc@yahoo.com
Subject Posted By Posted On
Letter to Insurance Melanie
Jul 2, 2007, 12:33 pm
RE: Burwell Letter to Insurance Dept American Homeowner
Jun 5, 2007, 9:11 pm
Burwell Letter to Insurance Dept Billy
Jun 5, 2007, 8:16 pm
State Farm HAS TO PAY FOR WIND-Take the feather Out Your Cap Kim David
Apr 13, 2006, 12:48 pm
: State Farm will even commit FRAUDto get what it w Fraud not Perjury
Apr 13, 2006, 12:34 pm
RE: State Farm - Inconsistent TX / MS Policy Coverage Cond State Farm = Bad Neighbor
Apr 13, 2006, 12:28 pm
RE: Florida rip off BRAD
Apr 13, 2006, 7:53 am
BOHICA - Predatory Insurers-Adjusters Are Hurting Consumers Roger Poe
Apr 11, 2006, 7:42 pm
Unfair TWIA Conduct Against Texas Consumers? Roger Poe
Apr 11, 2006, 4:53 pm
Unfair TWIA Conduct Against Texas Consumers? Roger Poe
Apr 11, 2006, 4:53 pm
RE: RE: Florida rip off Jj
Apr 11, 2006, 1:41 pm
RE: Florida rip off Hal
Apr 11, 2006, 11:00 am
Florida rip off Jj
Apr 11, 2006, 10:04 am
RE: State Farm - Inconsistent TX / MS Policy Coverage Cond BOHICA
Apr 11, 2006, 7:27 am
RE: Better idea BOHICA
Apr 11, 2006, 7:18 am
RocketMan - Rocket Fuel Is NOT A Safe Recreational Drug Kim Luke
Apr 10, 2006, 11:28 pm
Bla Bla Bla RocketMan
Apr 10, 2006, 9:41 pm
RE: This is what tort reform gets you Wooo hooo
Apr 10, 2006, 4:29 pm
This is what tort reform gets you Frank
Apr 10, 2006, 4:19 pm
RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants Rich Pyorre
Apr 10, 2006, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what Wordy Guy
Apr 10, 2006, 3:51 pm
RE: RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it w Perjury?
Apr 10, 2006, 3:38 pm
State Farm - Inconsistent TX / MS Policy Coverage Conduct? Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 3:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: Re: Article regarding State Farm Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 2:39 pm
RE: RE: Re: Article regarding State Farm Justice For All
Apr 10, 2006, 2:26 pm
State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants American Woman
Apr 10, 2006, 2:19 pm
Here's a Thought AD
Apr 10, 2006, 2:09 pm
RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants BRAD
Apr 10, 2006, 12:42 pm
State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants Rich Pyorre
Apr 10, 2006, 12:10 pm
RE: RE: Where are the agents and Flood Limits Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 12:01 pm
Insurance Commish Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 11:29 am
RE: Where are the agents and Flood Limits BRAD
Apr 10, 2006, 11:22 am
RE: Re: Article regarding State Farm BRAD
Apr 10, 2006, 11:18 am
RE: Better idea Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 10:57 am
Better idea Dork
Apr 10, 2006, 10:45 am
Pat-Testimony Allstate Intructs Adjusters To Underpay Claims Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 10:26 am
Pay Adjustors? Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 10:14 am
Pat-Testimony Allstate Intructs Adjusters To Underpay Claims Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 10:03 am
RE: RE: The Bottom Line Are you nuts?
Apr 10, 2006, 9:06 am
RE: RE: Rogers' experience w industry Pat
Apr 10, 2006, 7:45 am
RE: Rogers' experience w industry Roger
Apr 10, 2006, 7:42 am
Pat -You Forgot To Mention Some Important Pay scale Details Roger Poe
Apr 9, 2006, 2:55 pm
J Pat
Apr 9, 2006, 12:12 pm
RE: RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Da J
Apr 9, 2006, 10:43 am
RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage Pat
Apr 9, 2006, 10:06 am
State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage 2 Roger Poe
Apr 8, 2006, 12:54 pm
Sun Man RocketMan
Apr 8, 2006, 10:12 am
RE: The Bottom Line Sun Man
Apr 8, 2006, 5:41 am
RE: The Bottom Line Sun Man
Apr 8, 2006, 5:41 am
RE: The Bottom Line Sun Man
Apr 8, 2006, 5:40 am
RE: RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Da Dasfuk
Apr 8, 2006, 12:51 am
RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage Roger Poe
Apr 7, 2006, 9:38 pm
State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage Roger Poe
Apr 7, 2006, 9:25 pm
RE: Hurrican Endorsement Jj
Apr 7, 2006, 8:58 pm
The Bottom Line RocketMan
Apr 7, 2006, 8:45 pm
RE: Mark
Apr 7, 2006, 8:34 pm
"Hurricane Endorsement" Uninformed
Apr 7, 2006, 5:16 pm
Really? Oh me too
Apr 7, 2006, 4:16 pm
Re: Article regarding State Farm Notes
Apr 7, 2006, 12:50 pm
Where are the agents and Flood Limits Rater
Apr 7, 2006, 10:21 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.