Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

State Farm: We're Paying Wind Damage Claims

Southeast News • April 7, 2006
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. is paying for Hurricane Katrina property losses when evidence shows that wind caused the damage, James Burwell, claims manager, wrote in a letter to the ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: State Farm - Inconsistent TX / MS Policy Coverage Conduct?

Posted On: April 10, 2006, 3:04 pm CDT
Posted By: Roger Poe
Comment:
Is is disturbing to note that in Texas, hurricane Rita claimants are being told by State Farm and Allstate that wind lifted / broken tar sealant bonds on shingles, is not (policy covered) damage to shingles.


ELK Corporation strongly disagrees;

__________

TECHNICAL BULLETIN - HURRICANE EXPOSURE

The process of detecting and evaluating damage from hurricane exposure is subjective at best, and often everyone involved may offer a different assessment.

Damage can range from wind uplift, shingle loss, broken sealant bonds, granule loss, external sources, and may not be readily apparent. However, even small amounts of damage can harm the surfacing material, leading to deterioration of the shingles months or years later.

GRANULE LOSS
Regarding damage to the embedded granule surfacing in the asphalt top coating, hurricane wind exposure can result in varying degrees of granule loss. Hurricane wind exposure loosens the granules, potentially allowing the granules to separate from the coating layer and wash off the roof.

Without the granule surfacing, the asphalt top coating is exposed to ultraviolet radiation from ordinary sunlight and will eventually deteriorate, exposing the fiberglass substrate and creating a leak potential. If a shingle indicates outward damage, the underlying components may be compromised and affected to some degree.

The extent of granule loss resulting from hurricane exposure is influenced by, but not limited to, the following:

1. Age of the product.
2. Force and duration of winds and wind driven rain.
3. Type and amount of wind driven debris.
4. Orientation and slope of the deck in relation to winds.
5. Amount of foot traffic.

BROKEN SEALANT BONDS
When sealant bonds are broken due to hurricane winds, it is possible, but not likely, for shingles to reseal. The subsequent strength of resealing, if any, would not be as strong as the initial thermal bond and would be contingent on, but not limited to, the following:

1. Age of the product.
2. Time of year and amount of exposure to ambient temperatures.
3. Length of time before shingles are exposed to subsequent high wind events.
4. Orientation and slope of deck.
5. Stress and strain on the shingles due to exposure to sustained high winds and/or deck movement.
6. Number, placement, type, and length of fasteners.
7. Contamination to the sealant bonds by dirt, debris, or other foreign substance.
8. Condition of the underlying deck or underlying shingles if a roof over.

In accordance with the terms of the limited warranty, there is no coverage for damage caused by hurricanes. Shingles in hurricane areas will continue to carry the limited warranty for manufacturing defects and remaining limited wind warranty.

Any damage relating to conditions caused by a hurricane, including granule loss, breach of the seals, nail tears and other structural damage, will not be covered by the limited warranty or limited wind warranty at any time.

TB-420 2/24/06
ELK P.O. Box 500 Ennis, TX. 75120
Toll Free - 1-866-355-8324 www.elkcorp.com
__________


Seems like State Farm will have to justify their Texas wind coverage position, that soundly contradicts their Mississippi wind coverage position.

http://www.sunherald.com/mld/thesunherald/news/special_packages/renewal/long_beach/14281112.htm
Subject Posted By Posted On
Letter to Insurance Melanie
Jul 2, 2007, 12:33 pm
RE: Burwell Letter to Insurance Dept American Homeowner
Jun 5, 2007, 9:11 pm
Burwell Letter to Insurance Dept Billy
Jun 5, 2007, 8:16 pm
State Farm HAS TO PAY FOR WIND-Take the feather Out Your Cap Kim David
Apr 13, 2006, 12:48 pm
: State Farm will even commit FRAUDto get what it w Fraud not Perjury
Apr 13, 2006, 12:34 pm
RE: State Farm - Inconsistent TX / MS Policy Coverage Cond State Farm = Bad Neighbor
Apr 13, 2006, 12:28 pm
RE: Florida rip off BRAD
Apr 13, 2006, 7:53 am
BOHICA - Predatory Insurers-Adjusters Are Hurting Consumers Roger Poe
Apr 11, 2006, 7:42 pm
Unfair TWIA Conduct Against Texas Consumers? Roger Poe
Apr 11, 2006, 4:53 pm
Unfair TWIA Conduct Against Texas Consumers? Roger Poe
Apr 11, 2006, 4:53 pm
RE: RE: Florida rip off Jj
Apr 11, 2006, 1:41 pm
RE: Florida rip off Hal
Apr 11, 2006, 11:00 am
Florida rip off Jj
Apr 11, 2006, 10:04 am
RE: State Farm - Inconsistent TX / MS Policy Coverage Cond BOHICA
Apr 11, 2006, 7:27 am
RE: Better idea BOHICA
Apr 11, 2006, 7:18 am
RocketMan - Rocket Fuel Is NOT A Safe Recreational Drug Kim Luke
Apr 10, 2006, 11:28 pm
Bla Bla Bla RocketMan
Apr 10, 2006, 9:41 pm
RE: This is what tort reform gets you Wooo hooo
Apr 10, 2006, 4:29 pm
This is what tort reform gets you Frank
Apr 10, 2006, 4:19 pm
RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants Rich Pyorre
Apr 10, 2006, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what Wordy Guy
Apr 10, 2006, 3:51 pm
RE: RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it w Perjury?
Apr 10, 2006, 3:38 pm
State Farm - Inconsistent TX / MS Policy Coverage Conduct? Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 3:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: Re: Article regarding State Farm Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 2:39 pm
RE: RE: Re: Article regarding State Farm Justice For All
Apr 10, 2006, 2:26 pm
State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants American Woman
Apr 10, 2006, 2:19 pm
Here's a Thought AD
Apr 10, 2006, 2:09 pm
RE: State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants BRAD
Apr 10, 2006, 12:42 pm
State Farm will even commit perjury to get what it wants Rich Pyorre
Apr 10, 2006, 12:10 pm
RE: RE: Where are the agents and Flood Limits Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 12:01 pm
Insurance Commish Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 11:29 am
RE: Where are the agents and Flood Limits BRAD
Apr 10, 2006, 11:22 am
RE: Re: Article regarding State Farm BRAD
Apr 10, 2006, 11:18 am
RE: Better idea Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 10:57 am
Better idea Dork
Apr 10, 2006, 10:45 am
Pat-Testimony Allstate Intructs Adjusters To Underpay Claims Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 10:26 am
Pay Adjustors? Hal
Apr 10, 2006, 10:14 am
Pat-Testimony Allstate Intructs Adjusters To Underpay Claims Roger Poe
Apr 10, 2006, 10:03 am
RE: RE: The Bottom Line Are you nuts?
Apr 10, 2006, 9:06 am
RE: RE: Rogers' experience w industry Pat
Apr 10, 2006, 7:45 am
RE: Rogers' experience w industry Roger
Apr 10, 2006, 7:42 am
Pat -You Forgot To Mention Some Important Pay scale Details Roger Poe
Apr 9, 2006, 2:55 pm
J Pat
Apr 9, 2006, 12:12 pm
RE: RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Da J
Apr 9, 2006, 10:43 am
RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage Pat
Apr 9, 2006, 10:06 am
State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage 2 Roger Poe
Apr 8, 2006, 12:54 pm
Sun Man RocketMan
Apr 8, 2006, 10:12 am
RE: The Bottom Line Sun Man
Apr 8, 2006, 5:41 am
RE: The Bottom Line Sun Man
Apr 8, 2006, 5:41 am
RE: The Bottom Line Sun Man
Apr 8, 2006, 5:40 am
RE: RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Da Dasfuk
Apr 8, 2006, 12:51 am
RE: State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage Roger Poe
Apr 7, 2006, 9:38 pm
State Farm & Allstate Deny Blatant Hurricane Rita Damage Roger Poe
Apr 7, 2006, 9:25 pm
RE: Hurrican Endorsement Jj
Apr 7, 2006, 8:58 pm
The Bottom Line RocketMan
Apr 7, 2006, 8:45 pm
RE: Mark
Apr 7, 2006, 8:34 pm
"Hurricane Endorsement" Uninformed
Apr 7, 2006, 5:16 pm
Really? Oh me too
Apr 7, 2006, 4:16 pm
Re: Article regarding State Farm Notes
Apr 7, 2006, 12:50 pm
Where are the agents and Flood Limits Rater
Apr 7, 2006, 10:21 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.