Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Judge Allows Miss. Suit Against Agent for Lapsed Flood Policy
Southeast News November 17, 2006
A federal judge has ruled that a Gulf Coast couple can sue their insurance agent for negligence after he allegedly allowed their flood insurance policy to lapse only days before Hurricane Katrina ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| What has happened to justice and compassion?? | A | Mar 8, 2007, 11:00 pm |
| A vision of the future | Bubba | Dec 22, 2006, 12:02 pm |
| The Rest of the Story....so far anyway | Ambulance Chaser | Dec 22, 2006, 1:26 am |
| Flood Cancellation | FLOOD | Nov 21, 2006, 9:17 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Flood Cancellation | Hard to say | Nov 21, 2006, 8:45 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Flood Cancellation | Will | Nov 19, 2006, 6:31 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Flood Cancellation | Dasfuk | Nov 17, 2006, 11:48 pm |
| Agent | Bubba | Nov 17, 2006, 8:28 pm |
| RE: Pmt to agt is pmt to Co | Ray | Nov 17, 2006, 8:23 pm |
| Pmt to agt is pmt to Co | Wake Up Agents | Nov 17, 2006, 7:00 pm |
| RE: RE: Customer Cancelled by being slow | Mary Lynn Proctor | Nov 17, 2006, 3:45 pm |
| RE: Customer Cancelled by being slow | Domino | Nov 17, 2006, 3:07 pm |
| Customer Cancelled by being slow | Bubba | Nov 17, 2006, 2:41 pm |
| RE: Canceled flood policy. | Super CSR | Nov 17, 2006, 2:33 pm |
| RE: RE: Flood Cancellation | Ray | Nov 17, 2006, 2:19 pm |
| Would like response from Nationwide agents | Forum Reader | Nov 17, 2006, 2:03 pm |
| RE: Flood Cancellation | Mary Lynn Proctor | Nov 17, 2006, 2:01 pm |
| RE: Flood Cancellation | Key West agent | Nov 17, 2006, 1:43 pm |
| Flood Cancellation | Connie | Nov 17, 2006, 1:28 pm |
| RE: Canceled flood policy. | JP | Nov 17, 2006, 1:24 pm |
| Payment dropped in mail slot | Check's in da mail | Nov 17, 2006, 12:56 pm |
| Canceled flood policy. | Ray | Nov 17, 2006, 12:53 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: Flood Cancellation
The loss I am sure was devastating, especially when their intentions were to renew the policy, however it still falls back on the insured or the party responsible for payment of the coverage, if they wanted to renew, as there are several notices required prior to the cancellation or confirmation that coverage has lapsed. There are so many agents that are willing to work with their clients to get the coverage renewed & if the insured has written or documented verbal correspondence that the payment was in their office early enough to renew or that their coverage would be renewed in-lieu of having to be rewritten then it really is an E&O exposure, otherwise it is the responsibility of the consumer to get what they pay for according to the terms of the seller.
This kind of complete disregard is present in all industries, not just insurance, so should I sue the Lottery Commission for buying the lottery ticket with the last drawings winning numbers & claiming that I wanted it for the last drawing? I wonder how that would go over in our court system?