Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Rep. Thompson: Miss. Katrina Ruling Will Prompt Probe of Insurers
Southeast News • January 15, 2007
A federal judge's ruling in favor of a Biloxi couple in a Hurricane Katrina insurance lawsuit will prompt a congressional investigation into insurance companies' denial of claims, Rep. Bennie ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Pull out! | Senter Upheld Concurrent | Jan 19, 2007, 8:21 pm |
| Back in the Bay Said it all & it's soooo True. | Good Hands My As s | Jan 17, 2007, 12:41 pm |
| Pull out! | Maurice Green | Jan 16, 2007, 10:22 pm |
| RE: Pull out! | Back in the day | Jan 16, 2007, 2:53 pm |
| RE: Pull out! | Imagine the Nerve | Jan 16, 2007, 1:02 am |
| SF in contempt 1/12/07 in OK class action | Katrina Victim | Jan 15, 2007, 10:42 pm |
| Adios, See Ya, Bye Bye to Good Neighbors | Insured by Bad Neighbors | Jan 15, 2007, 7:10 pm |
| BOBALU No.. It's Get Out the USA Good Neighbor for IRAQ. | Bay St. Louis Homeowner | Jan 15, 2007, 6:37 pm |
| My opinion | 30 yr Tex SF AGT | Jan 15, 2007, 6:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Conservative Federal Judge | Katrina Victim | Jan 15, 2007, 5:57 pm |
| RE: RE: Conservative Federal Judge | CLR | Jan 15, 2007, 5:06 pm |
| RE: Conservative Federal Judge | Katrina Victim | Jan 15, 2007, 4:10 pm |
| RE: Conservative Federal Judge ! | hank | Jan 15, 2007, 4:02 pm |
| Conservative Federal Judge ! | Katria Victim | Jan 15, 2007, 3:59 pm |
| RE: Keep in mind... | CLR | Jan 15, 2007, 2:44 pm |
| Keep in mind... | NY agent | Jan 15, 2007, 2:38 pm |
| RE: Pull out! | CLR | Jan 15, 2007, 2:28 pm |
| RE: Pull out! | jeff | Jan 15, 2007, 2:18 pm |
| Pull out! | bob laublaw | Jan 15, 2007, 2:08 pm |
| Send them to Iraq & Bring our Americans Home | Bay St. Louis HOMEOWNER | Jan 15, 2007, 2:09 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: Pull out!
But since the company's own documents showed there was wind damage as well as flood damage, and since the company refused to apportion damage between covered wind loss and excluded flood loss, Senter said he had no choice but to interpret the contract in favor of the insured. (See the New York Times for more details than fit in the IJ article.)