Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Fla. Day 2: Senate Passes 25% Rate Cut; Citizens Would Enter Commercial
Southeast News January 18, 2007
Two days into a special legislative session, after debating 20 amendments, the Florida Senate voted to pass Senate Bill 4-A, a measure which promises an average 25 percent premium cut to ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: 25% rate cut in FL | Scot | Jan 22, 2007, 9:36 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Decrease? Increase? | I have a question | Jan 19, 2007, 5:42 pm |
| RE: RE: Decrease? Increase? | A FL year round resident | Jan 19, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| RE: Decrease? Increase? | A FL year round resident | Jan 19, 2007, 3:26 pm |
| RE: Decrease? Increase? | I have a question | Jan 19, 2007, 3:25 pm |
| Decrease? Increase? | gill fin | Jan 19, 2007, 3:06 pm |
| 25% rate cut in FL | perplexed again | Jan 19, 2007, 1:01 pm |
| RE: 25% rate cut in FL | Scot | Jan 19, 2007, 12:42 pm |
| RE: 25% rate cut | LOL | Jan 19, 2007, 9:27 am |
| Anyone interested | A FL year round resident | Jan 19, 2007, 9:14 am |
| RE: 25% rate cut | Interested | Jan 19, 2007, 8:47 am |
| RE: anyone interested | LL | Jan 18, 2007, 7:43 pm |
| anyone interested | JR | Jan 18, 2007, 4:30 pm |
| affordable??? | bob | Jan 18, 2007, 4:23 pm |
| RE: RE: Special Session | Tom | Jan 18, 2007, 3:46 pm |
| RE: Just you wait. | perplexed | Jan 18, 2007, 3:25 pm |
| RE: Just you wait. | Tired in Florida | Jan 18, 2007, 3:20 pm |
| Just you wait. | Iconoclast | Jan 18, 2007, 3:08 pm |
| RE: Special Session | perplexed | Jan 18, 2007, 2:45 pm |
| Special Session | Tom | Jan 18, 2007, 2:29 pm |
| 25% rate cut | curious | Jan 18, 2007, 2:23 pm |
| RE: 25% rate cut | Fantasia | Jan 18, 2007, 1:49 pm |
| 25% rate cut | curious | Jan 18, 2007, 1:41 pm |
| did someone say E&O for the agent? | Compman | Jan 18, 2007, 1:05 pm |
| who's in charge? | bob | Jan 18, 2007, 12:55 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: 25% rate cut in FL
Sorry for not getting back to you but was sidetracked Friday afternoon. To answer your questions, I offer the following:
On the topic of not being able to carry forward prior years profits:
Carriers are required to "close" the books (i.e. underwriting profit or loss) annually due to federal tax code. There currently is no provision to allow them to save past year profits and "store" them for the next fiscal year. While one would think this would be a prudent practice to help smooth the peaks and valleys of financial performance, no one in the federal legislature has decided to tackle this needed feature.
With respect to reserving practices:
Each state, through it's appropriate regulatory body establishes the minimum reserving amount and through the National Insurance Commissioners Association, they have unilaterally landed on a 33% reserve amont. This means that for every dollar in premium taken in, 1/3rd has to be set aside in liquidable assets for claims payments.
Loss results, financial reporting and profit taking:
Most insurance companies are stock companies so the profits go back to the stock holders. Mutual Insurance Companies (most of these are life insurance, not property casualty) pay the profits back to their policyholders as there is no stock. The policyholders own the company.
A final thought: States will never give up the right to regulate prices - ultimately we might see federal regulation on the policy language, especially for commercial lines and there are also organizations like AM Best that not only rate carrier's financial status but also provide common policy language which is adopted by many carriers. I met with Hank Greenberg, of AIG fame several years ago and this was his thinking. Regardless of how the industry thinks of Hank, he knew his stuff. I certainly respect him.
Best Regards,
Scot