Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Miss. Commissioner, AG Upset Over State Farm Cutback
Southeast News February 15, 2007
Mississippi officials are concerned about the effect State Farm's decision to curtail its insurance writings will have on rebuilding efforts and remaining insurance markets.
State Farm, ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| I care | ??? | May 9, 2007, 3:57 pm |
| RE: RE: No More | Bubba | May 9, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| RE: No More | History | May 9, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: History | Bubba | May 9, 2007, 2:51 pm |
| RE: No More | Bubba | May 9, 2007, 2:28 pm |
| No More | The one who cares | May 9, 2007, 12:57 pm |
| RE: RE: History | Melanie | May 9, 2007, 12:34 pm |
| RE: History | Bubba | May 1, 2007, 9:11 pm |
| History | Fraud is the name | May 1, 2007, 6:44 pm |
| ??? | History | May 1, 2007, 6:42 pm |
| Fraud?? | melanie | May 1, 2007, 6:40 pm |
| RE: Fraud definition and conviction | Bingo | May 1, 2007, 6:34 pm |
| Fraud definition and conviction | May 1, 2007, 2:22 pm |
|
| committed | lots of | May 1, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| RE: RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insura | Mjolnir | Apr 30, 2007, 2:21 pm |
| RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance. | Hal | Apr 30, 2007, 8:46 am |
| A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance... | Mjolnir | Apr 30, 2007, 8:14 am |
| @ | pip cases ethics | Apr 29, 2007, 2:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws | Bubba | Apr 28, 2007, 9:34 pm |
| RE: RE: number? Sold Out we need laws | Justice | Apr 28, 2007, 9:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws | Care | Apr 28, 2007, 9:21 pm |
| RE: Wrong number? | Results | Apr 28, 2007, 9:12 pm |
| RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws | Sold Out | Apr 28, 2007, 9:10 pm |
| Wrong number? | Bubba | Apr 28, 2007, 8:54 pm |
| RE: read!! remmber and thank you | big wrong | Apr 28, 2007, 8:35 pm |
| read!! remmber and thank you | Hope | Apr 28, 2007, 8:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you | Faith | Apr 25, 2007, 11:21 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you | Hal | Apr 24, 2007, 9:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you no law | State farm has no bars | Apr 23, 2007, 9:47 pm |
| RE: RE: remmber and thank you | no more | Apr 23, 2007, 8:38 am |
| RE: remmber | ed ivan is that really you? | Apr 23, 2007, 8:32 am |
| You Don't KNOW or won't tell me? | Hal | Apr 22, 2007, 10:07 pm |
| RE: RE: WHY not answer my question? | Faith | Apr 22, 2007, 8:20 pm |
| RE: WHY not answer my question? | History | Apr 22, 2007, 8:10 pm |
| WHY not answer my question? | Hal | Apr 22, 2007, 6:00 pm |
| RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT | a -Z CARES | Apr 22, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP | THE REAL US | Apr 22, 2007, 3:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP | SO VERY WRONG | Apr 22, 2007, 3:01 pm |
| RE: RE: State of Confusion | TELL ME ABOUT THE LAW OF THE L | Apr 22, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| RE: State of Confusion | Real stuff | Apr 22, 2007, 9:59 am |
| State of Confusion | Hal | Apr 19, 2007, 11:42 am |
| RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT | stand up .or wake up.CARE | Apr 19, 2007, 10:04 am |
| RE: sTATE OF WHAT | Hal | Mar 19, 2007, 8:40 am |
| sTATE OF WHAT | MELANIE | Mar 18, 2007, 7:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Hal | Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm |
| RE: tree sap transfer | hAL | Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | hAL | Mar 18, 2007, 6:10 pm |
| cALL THE ? WHO | HOPE | Mar 18, 2007, 5:31 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... | real / CLASS | Mar 18, 2007, 5:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... | Neighbor | Mar 18, 2007, 4:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: SF ... | care | Mar 18, 2007, 4:13 pm |
| RE: RE: SF ... | SoWhat | Mar 18, 2007, 9:35 am |
| RE: SF ... | mad | Mar 17, 2007, 6:36 pm |
| tree sap transfer-MORE_+ | melanie | Mar 15, 2007, 10:29 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Dail | Feb 27, 2007, 9:46 am |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer | ED | Feb 27, 2007, 9:37 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Ged | Feb 27, 2007, 9:31 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Muck | Feb 27, 2007, 9:19 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope- | Jack Stampliker | Feb 27, 2007, 9:07 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Fait | Jack Stampliker | Feb 27, 2007, 9:06 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Sap | Feb 27, 2007, 9:05 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Faith | Feb 27, 2007, 9:02 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | Melanie | Feb 27, 2007, 8:56 am |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | melanie | Feb 27, 2007, 8:49 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | Hal | Feb 27, 2007, 8:40 am |
| RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | mon (CODE)??/// | Feb 27, 2007, 8:24 am |
| tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | Ramondo Balaamababa | Feb 26, 2007, 11:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Ann | Feb 25, 2007, 2:27 pm |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Hope- Faith | Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am |
| RE: I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. | Melanie | Feb 24, 2007, 11:29 am |
| To: GED Imposter (Kim David) | The Original GED | Feb 23, 2007, 8:20 am |
| RE: tree sap transfer | The Sap. | Feb 22, 2007, 12:29 pm |
| RE: tree sap transfer | GED | Feb 22, 2007, 11:15 am |
| tree sap transfer | Gill Fin | Feb 19, 2007, 4:59 pm |
| Katrina nutrition information | chad balaamaba | Feb 19, 2007, 1:41 pm |
| Melanie | Ramondo Balaamaba | Feb 19, 2007, 1:28 pm |
| RE: Reality of the situation | william | Feb 19, 2007, 6:35 am |
| Case in point | Melanie | Feb 18, 2007, 11:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Reality of the situation | Melanie | Feb 18, 2007, 12:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Reality of the situation | Mjolnir | Feb 18, 2007, 9:32 am |
| Claims adjustors | Hal | Feb 17, 2007, 3:19 pm |
| RE: Reality of the situation | Melanie | Feb 17, 2007, 11:23 am |
| RE: Reality of the situation | Melanie | Feb 17, 2007, 10:39 am |
| Reality of the situation | Mike | Feb 16, 2007, 10:05 pm |
| know better | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 AL | rules | Feb 16, 2007, 4:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Fred | Feb 16, 2007, 2:34 pm |
| I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. | Ralph Balamabama | Feb 16, 2007, 2:09 pm |
| Lawyers needed to write | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 1:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | GED | Feb 16, 2007, 1:43 pm |
| RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | johnny b. | Feb 16, 2007, 1:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Lost | Fred | Feb 16, 2007, 1:09 pm |
| RE: Lost in the hysteria.. | Okay you win | Feb 16, 2007, 12:12 pm |
| RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | It,s Me Again | Feb 16, 2007, 12:09 pm |
| RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 12:03 pm |
| RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | Jeff | Feb 16, 2007, 12:00 pm |
| Lost in the hysteria.. | Mjolnir | Feb 16, 2007, 11:47 am |
| Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | Mjolnir | Feb 16, 2007, 11:44 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 11:41 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 11:34 am |
| RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Ralph Balamabama | Feb 16, 2007, 11:16 am |
| RE: Hey Ralph | Mel | Feb 16, 2007, 10:57 am |
| Hey Ralph | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 10:53 am |
| RE: Ms. Hodges... | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:34 am |
| RE: RE: Money's not the only thing.... | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:29 am |
| RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:24 am |
| RE: Money's not the only thing.... | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:19 am |
| RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Jeff | Feb 16, 2007, 10:15 am |
| RE: We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | Jeff | Feb 16, 2007, 10:03 am |
| Attorney General Send In The Troops...Attack! | Sick of Insurance | Feb 15, 2007, 10:11 pm |
| LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Insured by State Farm | Feb 15, 2007, 7:05 pm |
| RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Duke | Feb 15, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Ralph Balamabama | Feb 15, 2007, 5:31 pm |
| We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | Chad Balaamaba | Feb 15, 2007, 4:44 pm |
| RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | jim | Feb 15, 2007, 4:36 pm |
| Stinking Contracts | Contract Reader | Feb 15, 2007, 3:55 pm |
| I wonder | Dan | Feb 15, 2007, 3:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | DDT | Feb 15, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | Fred | Feb 15, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | WHITE BUDDHA | Feb 15, 2007, 2:45 pm |
| Money's not the only thing.... | Mjolnir | Feb 15, 2007, 2:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Fred | Feb 15, 2007, 1:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Melanie | Feb 15, 2007, 1:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | joe | Feb 15, 2007, 1:16 pm |
| RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Melanie | Feb 15, 2007, 1:11 pm |
| Small insurors need customers too | Hal | Feb 15, 2007, 1:08 pm |
| Ms. Hodges... | DDT | Feb 15, 2007, 1:04 pm |
| RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Realist | Feb 15, 2007, 12:54 pm |
| RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Melanie Hodges | Feb 15, 2007, 12:48 pm |
| What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Mjolnir | Feb 15, 2007, 9:55 am |
| Commissioners are funny | Hal | Feb 15, 2007, 8:49 am |
| SF ... | William | Feb 15, 2007, 7:07 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith
Farrell, Arad said, would receive a letter from State Farm denying her coverage for the loss of her home and everything in it.
The insurer had decided, he said, the loss was from flood, covered by federal flood insurance. State Farm would send an engineer later to sort out the wind and flood damage and maybe he would be able to pay something under Farrell's State Farm homeowner's policy.
"How do you know the wind didn't blow (her) house down?" Ortego asked.
"This is the $64 question," Arad said. "I mean, nobody knows."
The good news, he said, was they could take State Farm's denial letter to FEMA. FEMA helped those without insurance coverage, he said, but not much. He knew, he said, because he used to work for FEMA.
"I'm just telling you," the adjuster said. "I'm the messenger."
""Yeah," Ortego reluctantly agreed.
"Don't kill me," the adjuster said. "That's the way it is now and it's going to be for everybody.
"And I know that they are working on some kind of a guideline to see if they can help any and give any help. Understand? But the way it is now, they said this is flood. Understand?"
The adjuster acknowledged it would be tricky for an engineer to separate the wind and water damage.
Ortego bluntly asked Arad, "What do you think happened here?"
"What do I think personally, off-record? It's, it's the wind and water, you know?"
"Yeah," Ortego said.
"Wind and flood," Arad continued. "Now, what, how do they decide? I don't know. They might decide maybe, you know, like, uh, let's pay half of federal, let's pay half insurance. I have no idea. But I think that's the best solution, I mean, in my opinion."
Farrell and Ortego argued the wind, up to 150 miles per hour, could have blown the house up or down before the water arrived.
"The problem is, everybody was evacuated," Arad said. "Nobody was here to even witness it."
This would prove untrue, but so much was still unknown or uncertain in Katrina's chaotic aftermath.
At one point Ortego started to say something about State Farm, but Arad interrupted. "Oh, no, no," he said, speaking slowly, as if he were talking to a small child. "It's every company now."
"It's everybody?" Ortego asked in disbelief.
"Everybody," he said.
He explained the insurance policy was a contract, worded by lawyers, and the contract excluded damage from water.
Farrell did not get it. Her insurance policy included a hurricane deductible for direct physical loss from wind, wind gusts, hail, rain, tornadoes or cyclones.
In speaking with them, Arad learned they did have $15,500 in flood coverage. He coached them through composition of a contents list, on the spot.
He suggested categories of household items they could list - appliances, for example - so the total would equal the meager maximum of their flood policy, which Farrell had received directly from FEMA.
The first floor of her house had flooded in previous tropical storms. The whole area was in a flood zone. In heavy rains, flood water rose and flood water fell, leaving the houses intact.
Farrell tried to tell Arad this was a hurricane, this was different.
After the adjuster's visit, Ortego started digging.
The sun bore down. Her husband was impatient and ready to leave. Flies bit her. A helicopter whirred overhead.
Still she dug, breathing hard while debris clanked as she wrested it from the earth.
She found a vase that had belonged to her grandmother. Her Pawpaw's cooking pot. A fishing pole, bike and binoculars. Her mother's china. She even found some cash.
"I hit the jackpot over here," she called. "Y'all don't know how to dig."
"You know what you don't understand?" her husband asked.
"What?"
"Your Momma's sitting there breaking down watching y'all dig."
"Well," Ortego said, "this is all she has."
The other voices trailed off. Ortego's breath grew faster and harder as she labored in the heat. She had forgotten all about the tape recorder. So many things had happened since Katrina came to life over the ocean.
She called out one last time, to her younger brother, before the tape went silent.
"J.R.," she asked "what did you think of that insurance man?"
M O R E N E W S F R O M
• FEMA
• Outdoor Recreation
• Bay St. Louis, MS
• US News
• Discuss US News