Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

Miss. Commissioner, AG Upset Over State Farm Cutback

Southeast News • February 15, 2007
Mississippi officials are concerned about the effect State Farm's decision to curtail its insurance writings will have on rebuilding efforts and remaining insurance markets. State Farm, ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith

Posted On: February 27, 2007, 8:56 am CST
Posted By: Melanie
Comment:
The adjuster, Alon Arad, faced Farrell's feisty daughter.

Farrell, Arad said, would receive a letter from State Farm denying her coverage for the loss of her home and everything in it.

The insurer had decided, he said, the loss was from flood, covered by federal flood insurance. State Farm would send an engineer later to sort out the wind and flood damage and maybe he would be able to pay something under Farrell's State Farm homeowner's policy.

"How do you know the wind didn't blow (her) house down?" Ortego asked.

"This is the $64 question," Arad said. "I mean, nobody knows."

The good news, he said, was they could take State Farm's denial letter to FEMA. FEMA helped those without insurance coverage, he said, but not much. He knew, he said, because he used to work for FEMA.

"I'm just telling you," the adjuster said. "I'm the messenger."

""Yeah," Ortego reluctantly agreed.

"Don't kill me," the adjuster said. "That's the way it is now and it's going to be for everybody.

"And I know that they are working on some kind of a guideline to see if they can help any and give any help. Understand? But the way it is now, they said this is flood. Understand?"

The adjuster acknowledged it would be tricky for an engineer to separate the wind and water damage.

Ortego bluntly asked Arad, "What do you think happened here?"

"What do I think personally, off-record? It's, it's the wind and water, you know?"

"Yeah," Ortego said.

"Wind and flood," Arad continued. "Now, what, how do they decide? I don't know. They might decide maybe, you know, like, uh, let's pay half of federal, let's pay half insurance. I have no idea. But I think that's the best solution, I mean, in my opinion."

Farrell and Ortego argued the wind, up to 150 miles per hour, could have blown the house up or down before the water arrived.

"The problem is, everybody was evacuated," Arad said. "Nobody was here to even witness it."

This would prove untrue, but so much was still unknown or uncertain in Katrina's chaotic aftermath.

At one point Ortego started to say something about State Farm, but Arad interrupted. "Oh, no, no," he said, speaking slowly, as if he were talking to a small child. "It's every company now."

"It's everybody?" Ortego asked in disbelief.

"Everybody," he said.

He explained the insurance policy was a contract, worded by lawyers, and the contract excluded damage from water.

Farrell did not get it. Her insurance policy included a hurricane deductible for direct physical loss from wind, wind gusts, hail, rain, tornadoes or cyclones.

In speaking with them, Arad learned they did have $15,500 in flood coverage. He coached them through composition of a contents list, on the spot.

He suggested categories of household items they could list - appliances, for example - so the total would equal the meager maximum of their flood policy, which Farrell had received directly from FEMA.

The first floor of her house had flooded in previous tropical storms. The whole area was in a flood zone. In heavy rains, flood water rose and flood water fell, leaving the houses intact.

Farrell tried to tell Arad this was a hurricane, this was different.

After the adjuster's visit, Ortego started digging.

The sun bore down. Her husband was impatient and ready to leave. Flies bit her. A helicopter whirred overhead.

Still she dug, breathing hard while debris clanked as she wrested it from the earth.

She found a vase that had belonged to her grandmother. Her Pawpaw's cooking pot. A fishing pole, bike and binoculars. Her mother's china. She even found some cash.

"I hit the jackpot over here," she called. "Y'all don't know how to dig."

"You know what you don't understand?" her husband asked.

"What?"

"Your Momma's sitting there breaking down watching y'all dig."

"Well," Ortego said, "this is all she has."

The other voices trailed off. Ortego's breath grew faster and harder as she labored in the heat. She had forgotten all about the tape recorder. So many things had happened since Katrina came to life over the ocean.

She called out one last time, to her younger brother, before the tape went silent.

"J.R.," she asked "what did you think of that insurance man?"



M O R E N E W S F R O M
• FEMA
• Outdoor Recreation
• Bay St. Louis, MS
• US News
• Discuss US News
Subject Posted By Posted On
I care ???
May 9, 2007, 3:57 pm
RE: RE: No More Bubba
May 9, 2007, 3:14 pm
RE: No More History
May 9, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: History Bubba
May 9, 2007, 2:51 pm
RE: No More Bubba
May 9, 2007, 2:28 pm
No More The one who cares
May 9, 2007, 12:57 pm
RE: RE: History Melanie
May 9, 2007, 12:34 pm
RE: History Bubba
May 1, 2007, 9:11 pm
History Fraud is the name
May 1, 2007, 6:44 pm
??? History
May 1, 2007, 6:42 pm
Fraud?? melanie
May 1, 2007, 6:40 pm
RE: Fraud definition and conviction Bingo
May 1, 2007, 6:34 pm
Fraud definition and conviction
May 1, 2007, 2:22 pm
committed lots of
May 1, 2007, 1:17 pm
RE: RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insura Mjolnir
Apr 30, 2007, 2:21 pm
RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance. Hal
Apr 30, 2007, 8:46 am
A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance... Mjolnir
Apr 30, 2007, 8:14 am
@ pip cases ethics
Apr 29, 2007, 2:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Bubba
Apr 28, 2007, 9:34 pm
RE: RE: number? Sold Out we need laws Justice
Apr 28, 2007, 9:32 pm
RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Care
Apr 28, 2007, 9:21 pm
RE: Wrong number? Results
Apr 28, 2007, 9:12 pm
RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Sold Out
Apr 28, 2007, 9:10 pm
Wrong number? Bubba
Apr 28, 2007, 8:54 pm
RE: read!! remmber and thank you big wrong
Apr 28, 2007, 8:35 pm
read!! remmber and thank you Hope
Apr 28, 2007, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you Faith
Apr 25, 2007, 11:21 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you Hal
Apr 24, 2007, 9:12 am
RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you no law State farm has no bars
Apr 23, 2007, 9:47 pm
RE: RE: remmber and thank you no more
Apr 23, 2007, 8:38 am
RE: remmber ed ivan is that really you?
Apr 23, 2007, 8:32 am
You Don't KNOW or won't tell me? Hal
Apr 22, 2007, 10:07 pm
RE: RE: WHY not answer my question? Faith
Apr 22, 2007, 8:20 pm
RE: WHY not answer my question? History
Apr 22, 2007, 8:10 pm
WHY not answer my question? Hal
Apr 22, 2007, 6:00 pm
RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT a -Z CARES
Apr 22, 2007, 3:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP THE REAL US
Apr 22, 2007, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP SO VERY WRONG
Apr 22, 2007, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: State of Confusion TELL ME ABOUT THE LAW OF THE L
Apr 22, 2007, 2:52 pm
RE: State of Confusion Real stuff
Apr 22, 2007, 9:59 am
State of Confusion Hal
Apr 19, 2007, 11:42 am
RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT stand up .or wake up.CARE
Apr 19, 2007, 10:04 am
RE: sTATE OF WHAT Hal
Mar 19, 2007, 8:40 am
sTATE OF WHAT MELANIE
Mar 18, 2007, 7:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer Hal
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm
RE: tree sap transfer hAL
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm
RE: RE: tree sap transfer hAL
Mar 18, 2007, 6:10 pm
cALL THE ? WHO HOPE
Mar 18, 2007, 5:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... real / CLASS
Mar 18, 2007, 5:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... Neighbor
Mar 18, 2007, 4:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: SF ... care
Mar 18, 2007, 4:13 pm
RE: RE: SF ... SoWhat
Mar 18, 2007, 9:35 am
RE: SF ... mad
Mar 17, 2007, 6:36 pm
tree sap transfer-MORE_+ melanie
Mar 15, 2007, 10:29 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Dail
Feb 27, 2007, 9:46 am
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer ED
Feb 27, 2007, 9:37 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Ged
Feb 27, 2007, 9:31 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Muck
Feb 27, 2007, 9:19 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope- Jack Stampliker
Feb 27, 2007, 9:07 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Fait Jack Stampliker
Feb 27, 2007, 9:06 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Sap
Feb 27, 2007, 9:05 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Faith
Feb 27, 2007, 9:02 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Melanie
Feb 27, 2007, 8:56 am
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith melanie
Feb 27, 2007, 8:49 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Hal
Feb 27, 2007, 8:40 am
RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith mon (CODE)??///
Feb 27, 2007, 8:24 am
tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Ramondo Balaamababa
Feb 26, 2007, 11:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer Ann
Feb 25, 2007, 2:27 pm
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Hope- Faith
Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am
RE: I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. Melanie
Feb 24, 2007, 11:29 am
To: GED Imposter (Kim David) The Original GED
Feb 23, 2007, 8:20 am
RE: tree sap transfer The Sap.
Feb 22, 2007, 12:29 pm
RE: tree sap transfer GED
Feb 22, 2007, 11:15 am
tree sap transfer Gill Fin
Feb 19, 2007, 4:59 pm
Katrina nutrition information chad balaamaba
Feb 19, 2007, 1:41 pm
Melanie Ramondo Balaamaba
Feb 19, 2007, 1:28 pm
RE: Reality of the situation william
Feb 19, 2007, 6:35 am
Case in point Melanie
Feb 18, 2007, 11:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 18, 2007, 12:15 pm
RE: RE: Reality of the situation Mjolnir
Feb 18, 2007, 9:32 am
Claims adjustors Hal
Feb 17, 2007, 3:19 pm
RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 17, 2007, 11:23 am
RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 17, 2007, 10:39 am
Reality of the situation Mike
Feb 16, 2007, 10:05 pm
know better Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 6:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 AL rules
Feb 16, 2007, 4:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 3:38 pm
RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Fred
Feb 16, 2007, 2:34 pm
I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. Ralph Balamabama
Feb 16, 2007, 2:09 pm
Lawyers needed to write Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 1:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. GED
Feb 16, 2007, 1:43 pm
RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL johnny b.
Feb 16, 2007, 1:32 pm
RE: RE: Lost Fred
Feb 16, 2007, 1:09 pm
RE: Lost in the hysteria.. Okay you win
Feb 16, 2007, 12:12 pm
RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. It,s Me Again
Feb 16, 2007, 12:09 pm
RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 12:03 pm
RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 12:00 pm
Lost in the hysteria.. Mjolnir
Feb 16, 2007, 11:47 am
Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Mjolnir
Feb 16, 2007, 11:44 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 11:41 am
RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 11:34 am
RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Ralph Balamabama
Feb 16, 2007, 11:16 am
RE: Hey Ralph Mel
Feb 16, 2007, 10:57 am
Hey Ralph Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 10:53 am
RE: Ms. Hodges... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:34 am
RE: RE: Money's not the only thing.... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:29 am
RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:24 am
RE: Money's not the only thing.... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:19 am
RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 10:15 am
RE: We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 10:03 am
Attorney General Send In The Troops...Attack! Sick of Insurance
Feb 15, 2007, 10:11 pm
LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Insured by State Farm
Feb 15, 2007, 7:05 pm
RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Duke
Feb 15, 2007, 6:03 pm
Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Ralph Balamabama
Feb 15, 2007, 5:31 pm
We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Chad Balaamaba
Feb 15, 2007, 4:44 pm
RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! jim
Feb 15, 2007, 4:36 pm
Stinking Contracts Contract Reader
Feb 15, 2007, 3:55 pm
I wonder Dan
Feb 15, 2007, 3:26 pm
RE: RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! DDT
Feb 15, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Fred
Feb 15, 2007, 3:00 pm
Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! WHITE BUDDHA
Feb 15, 2007, 2:45 pm
Money's not the only thing.... Mjolnir
Feb 15, 2007, 2:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Fred
Feb 15, 2007, 1:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie
Feb 15, 2007, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? joe
Feb 15, 2007, 1:16 pm
RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie
Feb 15, 2007, 1:11 pm
Small insurors need customers too Hal
Feb 15, 2007, 1:08 pm
Ms. Hodges... DDT
Feb 15, 2007, 1:04 pm
RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Realist
Feb 15, 2007, 12:54 pm
RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie Hodges
Feb 15, 2007, 12:48 pm
What did the gulf states expect to happen? Mjolnir
Feb 15, 2007, 9:55 am
Commissioners are funny Hal
Feb 15, 2007, 8:49 am
SF ... William
Feb 15, 2007, 7:07 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.