Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Miss. Commissioner, AG Upset Over State Farm Cutback
Southeast News February 15, 2007
Mississippi officials are concerned about the effect State Farm's decision to curtail its insurance writings will have on rebuilding efforts and remaining insurance markets.
State Farm, ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| I care | ??? | May 9, 2007, 3:57 pm |
| RE: RE: No More | Bubba | May 9, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| RE: No More | History | May 9, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: History | Bubba | May 9, 2007, 2:51 pm |
| RE: No More | Bubba | May 9, 2007, 2:28 pm |
| No More | The one who cares | May 9, 2007, 12:57 pm |
| RE: RE: History | Melanie | May 9, 2007, 12:34 pm |
| RE: History | Bubba | May 1, 2007, 9:11 pm |
| History | Fraud is the name | May 1, 2007, 6:44 pm |
| ??? | History | May 1, 2007, 6:42 pm |
| Fraud?? | melanie | May 1, 2007, 6:40 pm |
| RE: Fraud definition and conviction | Bingo | May 1, 2007, 6:34 pm |
| Fraud definition and conviction | May 1, 2007, 2:22 pm |
|
| committed | lots of | May 1, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| RE: RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insura | Mjolnir | Apr 30, 2007, 2:21 pm |
| RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance. | Hal | Apr 30, 2007, 8:46 am |
| A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance... | Mjolnir | Apr 30, 2007, 8:14 am |
| @ | pip cases ethics | Apr 29, 2007, 2:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws | Bubba | Apr 28, 2007, 9:34 pm |
| RE: RE: number? Sold Out we need laws | Justice | Apr 28, 2007, 9:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws | Care | Apr 28, 2007, 9:21 pm |
| RE: Wrong number? | Results | Apr 28, 2007, 9:12 pm |
| RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws | Sold Out | Apr 28, 2007, 9:10 pm |
| Wrong number? | Bubba | Apr 28, 2007, 8:54 pm |
| RE: read!! remmber and thank you | big wrong | Apr 28, 2007, 8:35 pm |
| read!! remmber and thank you | Hope | Apr 28, 2007, 8:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you | Faith | Apr 25, 2007, 11:21 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you | Hal | Apr 24, 2007, 9:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you no law | State farm has no bars | Apr 23, 2007, 9:47 pm |
| RE: RE: remmber and thank you | no more | Apr 23, 2007, 8:38 am |
| RE: remmber | ed ivan is that really you? | Apr 23, 2007, 8:32 am |
| You Don't KNOW or won't tell me? | Hal | Apr 22, 2007, 10:07 pm |
| RE: RE: WHY not answer my question? | Faith | Apr 22, 2007, 8:20 pm |
| RE: WHY not answer my question? | History | Apr 22, 2007, 8:10 pm |
| WHY not answer my question? | Hal | Apr 22, 2007, 6:00 pm |
| RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT | a -Z CARES | Apr 22, 2007, 3:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP | THE REAL US | Apr 22, 2007, 3:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP | SO VERY WRONG | Apr 22, 2007, 3:01 pm |
| RE: RE: State of Confusion | TELL ME ABOUT THE LAW OF THE L | Apr 22, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| RE: State of Confusion | Real stuff | Apr 22, 2007, 9:59 am |
| State of Confusion | Hal | Apr 19, 2007, 11:42 am |
| RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT | stand up .or wake up.CARE | Apr 19, 2007, 10:04 am |
| RE: sTATE OF WHAT | Hal | Mar 19, 2007, 8:40 am |
| sTATE OF WHAT | MELANIE | Mar 18, 2007, 7:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Hal | Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm |
| RE: tree sap transfer | hAL | Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | hAL | Mar 18, 2007, 6:10 pm |
| cALL THE ? WHO | HOPE | Mar 18, 2007, 5:31 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... | real / CLASS | Mar 18, 2007, 5:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... | Neighbor | Mar 18, 2007, 4:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: SF ... | care | Mar 18, 2007, 4:13 pm |
| RE: RE: SF ... | SoWhat | Mar 18, 2007, 9:35 am |
| RE: SF ... | mad | Mar 17, 2007, 6:36 pm |
| tree sap transfer-MORE_+ | melanie | Mar 15, 2007, 10:29 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Dail | Feb 27, 2007, 9:46 am |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer | ED | Feb 27, 2007, 9:37 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Ged | Feb 27, 2007, 9:31 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Muck | Feb 27, 2007, 9:19 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope- | Jack Stampliker | Feb 27, 2007, 9:07 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Fait | Jack Stampliker | Feb 27, 2007, 9:06 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Sap | Feb 27, 2007, 9:05 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Faith | Feb 27, 2007, 9:02 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | Melanie | Feb 27, 2007, 8:56 am |
| RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | melanie | Feb 27, 2007, 8:49 am |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | Hal | Feb 27, 2007, 8:40 am |
| RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | mon (CODE)??/// | Feb 27, 2007, 8:24 am |
| tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith | Ramondo Balaamababa | Feb 26, 2007, 11:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Ann | Feb 25, 2007, 2:27 pm |
| RE: RE: tree sap transfer | Hope- Faith | Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am |
| RE: I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. | Melanie | Feb 24, 2007, 11:29 am |
| To: GED Imposter (Kim David) | The Original GED | Feb 23, 2007, 8:20 am |
| RE: tree sap transfer | The Sap. | Feb 22, 2007, 12:29 pm |
| RE: tree sap transfer | GED | Feb 22, 2007, 11:15 am |
| tree sap transfer | Gill Fin | Feb 19, 2007, 4:59 pm |
| Katrina nutrition information | chad balaamaba | Feb 19, 2007, 1:41 pm |
| Melanie | Ramondo Balaamaba | Feb 19, 2007, 1:28 pm |
| RE: Reality of the situation | william | Feb 19, 2007, 6:35 am |
| Case in point | Melanie | Feb 18, 2007, 11:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Reality of the situation | Melanie | Feb 18, 2007, 12:15 pm |
| RE: RE: Reality of the situation | Mjolnir | Feb 18, 2007, 9:32 am |
| Claims adjustors | Hal | Feb 17, 2007, 3:19 pm |
| RE: Reality of the situation | Melanie | Feb 17, 2007, 11:23 am |
| RE: Reality of the situation | Melanie | Feb 17, 2007, 10:39 am |
| Reality of the situation | Mike | Feb 16, 2007, 10:05 pm |
| know better | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 AL | rules | Feb 16, 2007, 4:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Fred | Feb 16, 2007, 2:34 pm |
| I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. | Ralph Balamabama | Feb 16, 2007, 2:09 pm |
| Lawyers needed to write | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 1:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | GED | Feb 16, 2007, 1:43 pm |
| RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | johnny b. | Feb 16, 2007, 1:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Lost | Fred | Feb 16, 2007, 1:09 pm |
| RE: Lost in the hysteria.. | Okay you win | Feb 16, 2007, 12:12 pm |
| RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | It,s Me Again | Feb 16, 2007, 12:09 pm |
| RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 12:03 pm |
| RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | Jeff | Feb 16, 2007, 12:00 pm |
| Lost in the hysteria.. | Mjolnir | Feb 16, 2007, 11:47 am |
| Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. | Mjolnir | Feb 16, 2007, 11:44 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 11:41 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 11:34 am |
| RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Ralph Balamabama | Feb 16, 2007, 11:16 am |
| RE: Hey Ralph | Mel | Feb 16, 2007, 10:57 am |
| Hey Ralph | Hal | Feb 16, 2007, 10:53 am |
| RE: Ms. Hodges... | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:34 am |
| RE: RE: Money's not the only thing.... | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:29 am |
| RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:24 am |
| RE: Money's not the only thing.... | Melanie | Feb 16, 2007, 10:19 am |
| RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Jeff | Feb 16, 2007, 10:15 am |
| RE: We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | Jeff | Feb 16, 2007, 10:03 am |
| Attorney General Send In The Troops...Attack! | Sick of Insurance | Feb 15, 2007, 10:11 pm |
| LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL | Insured by State Farm | Feb 15, 2007, 7:05 pm |
| RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Duke | Feb 15, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS | Ralph Balamabama | Feb 15, 2007, 5:31 pm |
| We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | Chad Balaamaba | Feb 15, 2007, 4:44 pm |
| RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | jim | Feb 15, 2007, 4:36 pm |
| Stinking Contracts | Contract Reader | Feb 15, 2007, 3:55 pm |
| I wonder | Dan | Feb 15, 2007, 3:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | DDT | Feb 15, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | Fred | Feb 15, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! | WHITE BUDDHA | Feb 15, 2007, 2:45 pm |
| Money's not the only thing.... | Mjolnir | Feb 15, 2007, 2:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Fred | Feb 15, 2007, 1:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Melanie | Feb 15, 2007, 1:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | joe | Feb 15, 2007, 1:16 pm |
| RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Melanie | Feb 15, 2007, 1:11 pm |
| Small insurors need customers too | Hal | Feb 15, 2007, 1:08 pm |
| Ms. Hodges... | DDT | Feb 15, 2007, 1:04 pm |
| RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Realist | Feb 15, 2007, 12:54 pm |
| RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Melanie Hodges | Feb 15, 2007, 12:48 pm |
| What did the gulf states expect to happen? | Mjolnir | Feb 15, 2007, 9:55 am |
| Commissioners are funny | Hal | Feb 15, 2007, 8:49 am |
| SF ... | William | Feb 15, 2007, 7:07 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: No More
• That State Farm added an additional premium after the initial premium had been paid;
• That State Farm only pays a portion of damages in an automobile rental accident regardless of who is at fault;
• That State Farm disagrees with police officers over assigning blame for car accidents; and
• That State Farm customer service representatives are rude, condescending, and give contradictory information.
However, it is not just consumers who are unhappy with the insurance industry. State Farm and other insurance companies came under fire from a recent report commissioned by John Garmendi, the California Insurance Commissioner. In his report titled "Lower Claims, Higher Profits: Where do Your Premium Dollars Go? An examination of the burgeoning profitability of homeowners and private passenger automobile insurance companies and its impact on consumers" (May, 2006) Garamendi studied loss ratios for a number of homeowner and automobile insurance companies including State Farm. In his report, Garamendi asked the question "Are premiums excessively high compared to the money paid out on insurance claims?"
Garamendi's report analyzed the loss ratio data for insurance companies from 2001 through 2005 (loss ratio is the ratio between the dollars paid out to settle claims and the dollars received from policyholders to pay premiums). Among his observations on auto insurance, Garamendi noted that most insurance companies are quick to submit rate filings in order to raise premiums when loss ratios increase, but when loss ratios decrease few insurance companies ever file to lower consumer premiums.
Garamendi also stated in the introduction to his report, "...an insurance company might have a lower loss ration when it fails to reduce its rates despite decreased losses. This is especially true if it had previously raised its rates when losses increased. If such a trend surfaces, one can infer that the insurance company is overcharging its policyholders."
State Farm and other insurance companies make a lot of money off the premiums they charge their customers, even if some of the premiums include illegal charges like the accident surcharge. If you paid the accident surcharge when you bought a policy with State Farm Insurance, you may be eligible to join a class action lawsuit. Talk to a lawyer to discuss your options.