Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

Miss. Commissioner, AG Upset Over State Farm Cutback

Southeast News • February 15, 2007
Mississippi officials are concerned about the effect State Farm's decision to curtail its insurance writings will have on rebuilding efforts and remaining insurance markets. State Farm, ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: No More

Posted On: May 9, 2007, 3:02 pm CDT
Posted By: History
Comment:
Consumers are becoming sick of how they are being treated by companies like State Farm. Consumer complaint websites are full of complaints about State Farm and its practices. My3cents.com has long lists of reviews complaining about how consumers have been treated by the insurance company. Among the complaints:

• That State Farm added an additional premium after the initial premium had been paid;
• That State Farm only pays a portion of damages in an automobile rental accident regardless of who is at fault;
• That State Farm disagrees with police officers over assigning blame for car accidents; and
• That State Farm customer service representatives are rude, condescending, and give contradictory information.


However, it is not just consumers who are unhappy with the insurance industry. State Farm and other insurance companies came under fire from a recent report commissioned by John Garmendi, the California Insurance Commissioner. In his report titled "Lower Claims, Higher Profits: Where do Your Premium Dollars Go? An examination of the burgeoning profitability of homeowners and private passenger automobile insurance companies and its impact on consumers" (May, 2006) Garamendi studied loss ratios for a number of homeowner and automobile insurance companies including State Farm. In his report, Garamendi asked the question "Are premiums excessively high compared to the money paid out on insurance claims?"

Garamendi's report analyzed the loss ratio data for insurance companies from 2001 through 2005 (loss ratio is the ratio between the dollars paid out to settle claims and the dollars received from policyholders to pay premiums). Among his observations on auto insurance, Garamendi noted that most insurance companies are quick to submit rate filings in order to raise premiums when loss ratios increase, but when loss ratios decrease few insurance companies ever file to lower consumer premiums.

Garamendi also stated in the introduction to his report, "...an insurance company might have a lower loss ration when it fails to reduce its rates despite decreased losses. This is especially true if it had previously raised its rates when losses increased. If such a trend surfaces, one can infer that the insurance company is overcharging its policyholders."

State Farm and other insurance companies make a lot of money off the premiums they charge their customers, even if some of the premiums include illegal charges like the accident surcharge. If you paid the accident surcharge when you bought a policy with State Farm Insurance, you may be eligible to join a class action lawsuit. Talk to a lawyer to discuss your options.
Subject Posted By Posted On
I care ???
May 9, 2007, 3:57 pm
RE: RE: No More Bubba
May 9, 2007, 3:14 pm
RE: No More History
May 9, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: History Bubba
May 9, 2007, 2:51 pm
RE: No More Bubba
May 9, 2007, 2:28 pm
No More The one who cares
May 9, 2007, 12:57 pm
RE: RE: History Melanie
May 9, 2007, 12:34 pm
RE: History Bubba
May 1, 2007, 9:11 pm
History Fraud is the name
May 1, 2007, 6:44 pm
??? History
May 1, 2007, 6:42 pm
Fraud?? melanie
May 1, 2007, 6:40 pm
RE: Fraud definition and conviction Bingo
May 1, 2007, 6:34 pm
Fraud definition and conviction
May 1, 2007, 2:22 pm
committed lots of
May 1, 2007, 1:17 pm
RE: RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insura Mjolnir
Apr 30, 2007, 2:21 pm
RE: A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance. Hal
Apr 30, 2007, 8:46 am
A larger amount of the fraud committed in the insurance... Mjolnir
Apr 30, 2007, 8:14 am
@ pip cases ethics
Apr 29, 2007, 2:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Bubba
Apr 28, 2007, 9:34 pm
RE: RE: number? Sold Out we need laws Justice
Apr 28, 2007, 9:32 pm
RE: RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Care
Apr 28, 2007, 9:21 pm
RE: Wrong number? Results
Apr 28, 2007, 9:12 pm
RE: Wrong number? Sold Out we need laws Sold Out
Apr 28, 2007, 9:10 pm
Wrong number? Bubba
Apr 28, 2007, 8:54 pm
RE: read!! remmber and thank you big wrong
Apr 28, 2007, 8:35 pm
read!! remmber and thank you Hope
Apr 28, 2007, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you Faith
Apr 25, 2007, 11:21 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you Hal
Apr 24, 2007, 9:12 am
RE: RE: RE: remmber and thank you no law State farm has no bars
Apr 23, 2007, 9:47 pm
RE: RE: remmber and thank you no more
Apr 23, 2007, 8:38 am
RE: remmber ed ivan is that really you?
Apr 23, 2007, 8:32 am
You Don't KNOW or won't tell me? Hal
Apr 22, 2007, 10:07 pm
RE: RE: WHY not answer my question? Faith
Apr 22, 2007, 8:20 pm
RE: WHY not answer my question? History
Apr 22, 2007, 8:10 pm
WHY not answer my question? Hal
Apr 22, 2007, 6:00 pm
RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT a -Z CARES
Apr 22, 2007, 3:14 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP THE REAL US
Apr 22, 2007, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer STAND UP SO VERY WRONG
Apr 22, 2007, 3:01 pm
RE: RE: State of Confusion TELL ME ABOUT THE LAW OF THE L
Apr 22, 2007, 2:52 pm
RE: State of Confusion Real stuff
Apr 22, 2007, 9:59 am
State of Confusion Hal
Apr 19, 2007, 11:42 am
RE: RE: sTATE OF WHAT stand up .or wake up.CARE
Apr 19, 2007, 10:04 am
RE: sTATE OF WHAT Hal
Mar 19, 2007, 8:40 am
sTATE OF WHAT MELANIE
Mar 18, 2007, 7:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer Hal
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm
RE: tree sap transfer hAL
Mar 18, 2007, 6:18 pm
RE: RE: tree sap transfer hAL
Mar 18, 2007, 6:10 pm
cALL THE ? WHO HOPE
Mar 18, 2007, 5:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... real / CLASS
Mar 18, 2007, 5:24 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: SF ... Neighbor
Mar 18, 2007, 4:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: SF ... care
Mar 18, 2007, 4:13 pm
RE: RE: SF ... SoWhat
Mar 18, 2007, 9:35 am
RE: SF ... mad
Mar 17, 2007, 6:36 pm
tree sap transfer-MORE_+ melanie
Mar 15, 2007, 10:29 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Dail
Feb 27, 2007, 9:46 am
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer ED
Feb 27, 2007, 9:37 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Ged
Feb 27, 2007, 9:31 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Muck
Feb 27, 2007, 9:19 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope- Jack Stampliker
Feb 27, 2007, 9:07 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Fait Jack Stampliker
Feb 27, 2007, 9:06 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Sap
Feb 27, 2007, 9:05 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Faith
Feb 27, 2007, 9:02 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Melanie
Feb 27, 2007, 8:56 am
RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith melanie
Feb 27, 2007, 8:49 am
RE: RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Hal
Feb 27, 2007, 8:40 am
RE: tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith mon (CODE)??///
Feb 27, 2007, 8:24 am
tree sap transfer for Melanie, Hope-Faith Ramondo Balaamababa
Feb 26, 2007, 11:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: tree sap transfer Ann
Feb 25, 2007, 2:27 pm
RE: RE: tree sap transfer Hope- Faith
Feb 24, 2007, 11:47 am
RE: I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. Melanie
Feb 24, 2007, 11:29 am
To: GED Imposter (Kim David) The Original GED
Feb 23, 2007, 8:20 am
RE: tree sap transfer The Sap.
Feb 22, 2007, 12:29 pm
RE: tree sap transfer GED
Feb 22, 2007, 11:15 am
tree sap transfer Gill Fin
Feb 19, 2007, 4:59 pm
Katrina nutrition information chad balaamaba
Feb 19, 2007, 1:41 pm
Melanie Ramondo Balaamaba
Feb 19, 2007, 1:28 pm
RE: Reality of the situation william
Feb 19, 2007, 6:35 am
Case in point Melanie
Feb 18, 2007, 11:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 18, 2007, 12:15 pm
RE: RE: Reality of the situation Mjolnir
Feb 18, 2007, 9:32 am
Claims adjustors Hal
Feb 17, 2007, 3:19 pm
RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 17, 2007, 11:23 am
RE: Reality of the situation Melanie
Feb 17, 2007, 10:39 am
Reality of the situation Mike
Feb 16, 2007, 10:05 pm
know better Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 6:03 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 AL rules
Feb 16, 2007, 4:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 3:38 pm
RE: RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Fred
Feb 16, 2007, 2:34 pm
I agree with GED. Melanie please try to be coherent. Ralph Balamabama
Feb 16, 2007, 2:09 pm
Lawyers needed to write Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 1:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. GED
Feb 16, 2007, 1:43 pm
RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL johnny b.
Feb 16, 2007, 1:32 pm
RE: RE: Lost Fred
Feb 16, 2007, 1:09 pm
RE: Lost in the hysteria.. Okay you win
Feb 16, 2007, 12:12 pm
RE: RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. It,s Me Again
Feb 16, 2007, 12:09 pm
RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 12:03 pm
RE: Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 12:00 pm
Lost in the hysteria.. Mjolnir
Feb 16, 2007, 11:47 am
Melanie, I'm not sure what your point is. Mjolnir
Feb 16, 2007, 11:44 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 11:41 am
RE: RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 11:34 am
RE: RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Ralph Balamabama
Feb 16, 2007, 11:16 am
RE: Hey Ralph Mel
Feb 16, 2007, 10:57 am
Hey Ralph Hal
Feb 16, 2007, 10:53 am
RE: Ms. Hodges... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:34 am
RE: RE: Money's not the only thing.... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:29 am
RE: LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:24 am
RE: Money's not the only thing.... Melanie
Feb 16, 2007, 10:19 am
RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 10:15 am
RE: We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Jeff
Feb 16, 2007, 10:03 am
Attorney General Send In The Troops...Attack! Sick of Insurance
Feb 15, 2007, 10:11 pm
LET THEM GO...FEMA: DISASTER INSURANCE 4 ALL Insured by State Farm
Feb 15, 2007, 7:05 pm
RE: Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Duke
Feb 15, 2007, 6:03 pm
Michigan is MI Mississippi is MS Ralph Balamabama
Feb 15, 2007, 5:31 pm
We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Chad Balaamaba
Feb 15, 2007, 4:44 pm
RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! jim
Feb 15, 2007, 4:36 pm
Stinking Contracts Contract Reader
Feb 15, 2007, 3:55 pm
I wonder Dan
Feb 15, 2007, 3:26 pm
RE: RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! DDT
Feb 15, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! Fred
Feb 15, 2007, 3:00 pm
Contracts!?? We don't need no stinkin' contracts! WHITE BUDDHA
Feb 15, 2007, 2:45 pm
Money's not the only thing.... Mjolnir
Feb 15, 2007, 2:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Fred
Feb 15, 2007, 1:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie
Feb 15, 2007, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? joe
Feb 15, 2007, 1:16 pm
RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie
Feb 15, 2007, 1:11 pm
Small insurors need customers too Hal
Feb 15, 2007, 1:08 pm
Ms. Hodges... DDT
Feb 15, 2007, 1:04 pm
RE: RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Realist
Feb 15, 2007, 12:54 pm
RE: What did the gulf states expect to happen? Melanie Hodges
Feb 15, 2007, 12:48 pm
What did the gulf states expect to happen? Mjolnir
Feb 15, 2007, 9:55 am
Commissioners are funny Hal
Feb 15, 2007, 8:49 am
SF ... William
Feb 15, 2007, 7:07 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.