Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

Miss. AG Hood Attacks State Farm as 'Robber Baron'

Southeast News • February 16, 2007
In a second press conference in as many days, Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood came out fighting against a recent decision by State Farm Insurance Co. to stop writing new home and commercial ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Hawk

Posted On: February 21, 2007, 2:08 pm CST
Posted By: KIM DAVID
Comment:
You Are a part of the Problem because you are an INSURANCE AGENT. Without Doubt!

You are covering for the Industry because you make a good living off of Your Clients.
It is fair to say that you would need the trust of a Homeowner, if you want their business but the truth is your loyalty is to the Insurer and not the Insured.

Have you ever heard of this saying,
Ignorance of Insured-Insurance Best Friend

Do you explain the benefits to the proposed insured or even try to explain ?
Do you explain the exclusions too?

Do you offer various Rates for
Optional Hurricane Deductibles in a policy that does not provide Hurricane Insurance?
How do you explain this to your Client?
A policy without coverage?

The Original Defination of Insurance is a sum of money that is paid to financially guarantee something of value.
The reason why the Industry is one of the largest in the USA.

We, the working Americans have put you up there, don't think we can't watch you fall down. We can replace you by becomming Self-Insured or allowing FEMA to sell disaster insurance.

Can you admit to calculating exclusions?
Can you admit to loopholes that are written into the policy to exclude coverage from the Insured but provide financial gain to the Insurer?

Can you admit that it is impossible to have a hurricane without wind & water in a coastal area?

Can you admit that Agents do not explain the policy to the Insured?
If they did, not one policy would be sold.

Can you admit that the purpose of the loopholes & policy exclusions are well calculated ways to prevent the Insured from collecting benefits?

Can You Admnit that the Insurer wants to collect premiums with Annual Rate Increases?
Can you admit the Insurer has calculated many ways to prevent providing financial protection to the Insured and they will usually force the Insured into litigation in order for them to collect what they paid you for in the first place?

Why did State Farm Settle in Misssissippi?
Were they hiding something?
Did they deceive their own?
Are they Innocent?
Did any one of their Agents even try to offer living expenses to their clients during the worst natural disaster in American History?
As far as I know, the only people that were schooled by their Agent were family/ friends of the Agent.

Did the Agent Follow Company Policy or did the Agent just avoid assisting their clients when strangers flew to our aide?

The Industry needs reform & regulation,
and that sir, is the truth!

Always Guaranteed, Annual Rate Increases
but Always find ways to deny claims.

State Farm was finally challenged by a hand full of Elected Politicians.
That was history and then they won.
State Farm Setteled. Why?
What were they afraid of?

Now they only want the cream of the crop but they don't want reform.

It's not about ego, it's about right & wrong. We are the American People, living in the USA. If you cannot provide fair policy go sell your policy in Iraq
where you will not be able to settle in or out of US COURTS.
Subject Posted By Posted On
Adjusters were inexperienced but Followed Co Policy Insured by Mattel
Feb 27, 2007, 10:19 am
The New 10 COMMANDMENTS for State Farm Kim David
Feb 26, 2007, 11:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults LL
Feb 26, 2007, 10:23 pm
RE: RE: Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults temblor
Feb 25, 2007, 10:14 pm
RE: Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults LL
Feb 25, 2007, 9:33 pm
Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults kim david
Feb 25, 2007, 1:19 pm
Hurricane Loss Temblor
Feb 25, 2007, 12:44 pm
My God Kim I am so sorry~!!~ Melanie
Feb 25, 2007, 11:56 am
To: Mark Kim David
Feb 25, 2007, 11:41 am
RE: RE: sorry you do not understand insurance Yes I will (Care)
Feb 25, 2007, 11:31 am
NO ONE OFFERED LIVING EXPENSES LA2MS KIM
Feb 24, 2007, 4:27 pm
RE: I do not sell P&C...Agents did not offer Living Exp 2 cl Temblor
Feb 24, 2007, 2:10 pm
I do not sell P&C...Agents did not offer Living Exp 2 client Kim David
Feb 24, 2007, 12:20 pm
RE: RE: Kim David sorry you do not understand insurance temblor
Feb 23, 2007, 5:17 pm
RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Mark
Feb 23, 2007, 4:27 pm
RE: Kim David sorry you do not understand insurance Ralph B
Feb 23, 2007, 3:52 pm
RE: RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Larry Lubell
Feb 23, 2007, 3:21 pm
RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Kim David
Feb 23, 2007, 3:01 pm
RE: Mark. They want a Rolex but only pay the price of a Time Kim David
Feb 23, 2007, 2:55 pm
RE: RE: To: DDT RE: Kim David Kim David
Feb 23, 2007, 2:52 pm
RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Sho' Nuff
Feb 23, 2007, 1:15 pm
RE: To: DDT RE: Kim David abd
Feb 23, 2007, 1:03 pm
Mark. They want a Rolex but only pay the price of a Timex. Ralph B
Feb 23, 2007, 11:30 am
RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Mark
Feb 23, 2007, 11:08 am
RE: RE: RE: Melanie are you off your prozac again.... Money?
Feb 23, 2007, 10:49 am
RE: RE: Melanie are you off your prozac again.... Ralph Balamabama
Feb 23, 2007, 10:28 am
RE: Melanie are you off your prozac again.... Pro?
Feb 23, 2007, 10:16 am
RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Kim David
Feb 23, 2007, 10:15 am
Melanie are you off your prozac again.... Ralph Balamabama
Feb 23, 2007, 9:58 am
RE: How about an original thought of your own. ... Melanie
Feb 23, 2007, 9:54 am
How about an original thought of your own. ... Ralph Balamabama
Feb 23, 2007, 9:48 am
RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Mark
Feb 23, 2007, 8:08 am
RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud Ralph & Mark this ones 4 you
Feb 22, 2007, 10:26 pm
Sap-Ged--State Farm+ Haag Eng+Agents+Adjusters+ All Pirates Agree With Sap-Ged
Feb 22, 2007, 9:12 pm
Kim David sorry you do not understand insurance... Ralph Balamabama
Feb 22, 2007, 2:26 pm
Kim David Temblor
Feb 22, 2007, 1:24 pm
SF is NOT Leaving!!! Mark
Feb 22, 2007, 1:19 pm
RE: Hood is ridiculous Want kind of world do you want
Feb 22, 2007, 12:15 pm
RE: RE: robber baron; them's big words for Jim Sap-Ged
Feb 22, 2007, 12:09 pm
RE: robber baron; them's big words for Jim Tree SAP
Feb 22, 2007, 12:00 pm
RE: How Much Did State Farm Net Before & After Katrina? Hope
Feb 22, 2007, 11:51 am
How Much Did State Farm Net Before & After Katrina? KIM DAVID
Feb 22, 2007, 10:12 am
To: DDT RE: Kim David KIM DAVID
Feb 22, 2007, 10:03 am
Kim David DDT
Feb 22, 2007, 6:51 am
RE: RE: A GOOD NEIGHBOR COMPANY- 4 ADVERTISEMENT ONLY Not enough to go around
Feb 21, 2007, 8:40 pm
RE: A GOOD NEIGHBOR COMPANY- 4 ADVERTISEMENT ONLY Stanley...They R Bad Neighbors
Feb 21, 2007, 6:03 pm
RE: Hawk Carrie V.
Feb 21, 2007, 2:10 pm
Hawk KIM DAVID
Feb 21, 2007, 2:08 pm
Flood Insurance Ralph Balamabama
Feb 21, 2007, 11:28 am
RE: RE: Hood Tracey
Feb 21, 2007, 3:50 am
RE: Hood Realist
Feb 20, 2007, 6:11 pm
Hood David Lockett
Feb 20, 2007, 3:28 pm
Flood Insurance FL Agent
Feb 20, 2007, 3:13 pm
Flood Coverage Danny Stephenson
Feb 20, 2007, 2:48 pm
RE: Federal Flood Insurance Fla Agent
Feb 20, 2007, 2:25 pm
State Farm's Wording Temblor
Feb 20, 2007, 2:13 pm
State Farm Agent Emancipation Party Time
Feb 20, 2007, 2:11 pm
Mississippi Justice Rules Osama Obama (lefty at large)
Feb 20, 2007, 2:01 pm
A GOOD NEIGHBOR COMPANY Stanley
Feb 20, 2007, 1:48 pm
RE: Larry Larry Lubell
Feb 20, 2007, 10:37 am
Re: Hawk's Policy Wording dot_hemath
Feb 20, 2007, 10:30 am
RE: Cherry Neo
Feb 20, 2007, 8:25 am
Larry Rick
Feb 20, 2007, 6:22 am
Larry Lubell Hawk
Feb 20, 2007, 6:13 am
RE: Cherry john
Feb 19, 2007, 10:16 pm
State Farm States No New Policies in Mississippi Larry Lubell
Feb 19, 2007, 5:34 pm
Mandatory Insurance, Mississippi style Gill Fin
Feb 19, 2007, 3:56 pm
To Dean - RE: Cherry Mark
Feb 19, 2007, 1:34 pm
robber baron; them's big words for Jim chad balaamaba
Feb 19, 2007, 1:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: Cherry andy
Feb 19, 2007, 12:19 pm
RE: RE: Cherry Dean
Feb 19, 2007, 12:14 pm
RE: Cherry Andy
Feb 19, 2007, 11:14 am
To: Another Rick Hawk
Feb 19, 2007, 10:47 am
Market share Another Rick
Feb 19, 2007, 8:49 am
Post of 2/18 6:59pm Hawk
Feb 19, 2007, 6:28 am
RE: Robber Baron's ????
Feb 18, 2007, 6:59 pm
RE: Hood is ridiculous Farm
Feb 18, 2007, 6:56 pm
Politicians Stafford
Feb 18, 2007, 10:45 am
Federal Flood Insurance Rick
Feb 18, 2007, 10:00 am
Robber Baron's ???? Hawk
Feb 18, 2007, 9:54 am
Hood is ridiculous John Crissman
Feb 18, 2007, 9:01 am
Insurance commissioner john
Feb 17, 2007, 1:26 pm
RE: Cherry Melanie
Feb 17, 2007, 11:41 am
Legal Points versus Justice Dean
Feb 17, 2007, 8:40 am
Cherry steve
Feb 17, 2007, 8:20 am
Back to article

Post a Comment

.