Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Ala. Judge Considers Penalties Against Katrina Whistleblowers
Southeast News March 22, 2007
A judge weighed possible contempt penalties this week for two Mississippi sisters and a prominent lawyer over thousands of pages of State Farm Insurance Co. documents that were secretly copied as ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Concurrent causation | adjusterjoe | Apr 2, 2007, 9:11 am |
| Concurrent causation | Lotus | Apr 2, 2007, 7:36 am |
| RE: SF | adjusterjoe | Apr 1, 2007, 3:40 pm |
| Whistleblower | Jewel | Mar 27, 2007, 10:11 am |
| RE: RE: Penalties | ernie | Mar 27, 2007, 9:05 am |
| RE: RE: Penalties calypso | Ron | Mar 26, 2007, 4:28 pm |
| RE: Penalties | Ron | Mar 26, 2007, 4:17 pm |
| SF | Lotus | Mar 26, 2007, 8:14 am |
| To Mike | tom | Mar 23, 2007, 2:28 pm |
| RE: Confidentiality? What confidentiality | Mike | Mar 23, 2007, 12:07 pm |
| RE: Katrina Whistleblowers | Mike | Mar 23, 2007, 11:58 am |
| RE: RE: RE: secrecy | dickiescruggslovesu | Mar 23, 2007, 11:52 am |
| Children | Steve R | Mar 23, 2007, 11:03 am |
| RE: RE: secrecy | Nan | Mar 23, 2007, 11:00 am |
| RE: secrecy | dickiescruggssucksthelifeout | Mar 23, 2007, 10:44 am |
| secrecy | Nan | Mar 23, 2007, 9:40 am |
| RE: Pudding proof | Mark | Mar 23, 2007, 9:35 am |
| Pudding proof | Been there | Mar 23, 2007, 9:27 am |
| RE: secrecy | Dickiescruggsisacriminal | Mar 23, 2007, 9:16 am |
| penalties | Steve R | Mar 23, 2007, 9:00 am |
| secrecy | Nan | Mar 23, 2007, 8:51 am |
| Confidentiality? What confidentiality | Gill Fin | Mar 22, 2007, 5:49 pm |
| RE: Penalties | Wondering | Mar 22, 2007, 3:32 pm |
| Katrina Whistleblowers | Bill Reed | Mar 22, 2007, 3:28 pm |
| Penalties | calypso | Mar 22, 2007, 2:28 pm |
| RE: Penalties? | Mary B. | Mar 22, 2007, 2:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Penalties? | Ken | Mar 22, 2007, 1:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Penalties? | communist | Mar 22, 2007, 1:15 pm |
| RE: Penalties? | Patriot | Mar 22, 2007, 1:09 pm |
| RE: Penalties? | Ken | Mar 22, 2007, 12:55 pm |
| Penalties? | MW | Mar 22, 2007, 8:31 am |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: RE: RE: Penalties?
Capitalism is a two-way street. If (and it reains an if) State Farm exercised bad faith or poor judgment, they deserved to be exposed. Democratic capitalism offers an economic system based on competition, under the law, to channel self-interest into the service of others, and to promote human creativity as the key to ending poverty. It is a political system containing constitutional checks and balances to protect the rights of the individual and to avoid the abuse of power. Underlying both the economic and political structures of our society, illuminating and guiding them, are our moral and cultural traditions, our rich Western inheritance from Greece and Rome, from Judaism and Christianity, from the Renaissance and modern humanism. The traditions that we have inherited, open and tolerant, have helped to form the ethical code stabilising the whole civic structure of our democratic way of life.
Who threatens the US Constitution and civil liberties more, State Farm exceutives or a couple of ladies who may have exposed wrongs?