Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

Sen. Lott Undecided Whether to Settle or Go to Trial On Katrina Claim

Southeast News • March 26, 2007
U.S. Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., who sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. for refusing to cover Hurricane Katrina's damage to his Gulf Coast home, said last week that he is weighing a settlement ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY

Posted On: March 27, 2007, 8:30 pm CDT
Posted By: Dale
Comment:
Trent Lott would never have reared his ugly head if State Farm had rolled over and paid the claim on his 3rd home as quickly as they did on his other two. I will tell you that I am a State Farm agent, and formerly a State Farm claim rep and not one time in my entire career has State Farm EVER encouraged me or any of my colleagues to delay payment or try to find a way to deny claims. It was quite the opposite when I was a claim rep. The people that trained me always said that we were to look at every possible way to extend coverage. It was always much easier to pay a claim than to deny one and it is still that way with my company. I am tired of people on this site bashing State Farm when they do not have a clue what they are talking about. Do we make mistakes, of course. But overall this company has a conscious and I am very proud to represent them. All that to say, good post Skit. Sorry I got long winded.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 4, 2007, 4:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Apr 4, 2007, 12:18 pm
To Mary B. Jewel
Apr 2, 2007, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 2, 2007, 3:00 pm
RE: Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Def Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:24 pm
Thank God For Trial Lawyers! Gerry
Apr 2, 2007, 11:33 am
Win & They Appeal: Settle for a Larger sum & Move On Lady Liberty
Mar 31, 2007, 9:01 pm
Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Defraud GOD
Mar 30, 2007, 8:11 pm
BTW adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:22 pm
RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:19 pm
RE: Putz... Mary B.
Mar 30, 2007, 2:12 pm
Let's look at it adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 9:17 am
What about Homes that still remain but in pieces ? Homeless without a Slab
Mar 29, 2007, 7:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 5:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 5:08 pm
RE: Not the enthusiasm.... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 4:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:38 pm
Not the enthusiasm.... Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 2:14 pm
RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:58 pm
295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 1:27 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 1:01 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:59 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:21 pm
RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:00 pm
Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 4:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry dale.gilliland.L932@statefarm.
Mar 28, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:12 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:03 pm
RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:01 pm
Oh Yeah adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:00 pm
Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:59 pm
RE: RE: Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:58 pm
RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about th Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:45 pm
Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. RE adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:20 pm
lazy, cheap, and stupid Cliff
Mar 28, 2007, 12:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY Dale
Mar 27, 2007, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Skit
Mar 26, 2007, 7:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 4:02 pm
RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Chuck
Mar 26, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 3:32 pm
Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Gill Fin
Mar 26, 2007, 3:12 pm
Hmmm Sam
Mar 26, 2007, 1:41 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.