Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Sen. Lott Undecided Whether to Settle or Go to Trial On Katrina Claim
Southeast News • March 26, 2007
U.S. Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., who sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. for refusing to cover Hurricane Katrina's damage to his Gulf Coast home, said last week that he is weighing a settlement ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... | adjusterjoe | Apr 4, 2007, 4:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Putz... | Dale | Apr 4, 2007, 12:18 pm |
| To Mary B. | Jewel | Apr 2, 2007, 3:09 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... | adjusterjoe | Apr 2, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| RE: Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Def | Mary B. | Apr 2, 2007, 2:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Putz... | Mary B. | Apr 2, 2007, 2:24 pm |
| Thank God For Trial Lawyers! | Gerry | Apr 2, 2007, 11:33 am |
| Win & They Appeal: Settle for a Larger sum & Move On | Lady Liberty | Mar 31, 2007, 9:01 pm |
| Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Defraud | GOD | Mar 30, 2007, 8:11 pm |
| BTW | adjusterjoe | Mar 30, 2007, 2:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Putz... | adjusterjoe | Mar 30, 2007, 2:19 pm |
| RE: Putz... | Mary B. | Mar 30, 2007, 2:12 pm |
| Let's look at it | adjusterjoe | Mar 30, 2007, 9:17 am |
| What about Homes that still remain but in pieces ? | Homeless without a Slab | Mar 29, 2007, 7:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | adjusterjoe | Mar 29, 2007, 5:31 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | Mark | Mar 29, 2007, 5:08 pm |
| RE: Not the enthusiasm.... | adjusterjoe | Mar 29, 2007, 4:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go | Dale | Mar 29, 2007, 3:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go | adjusterjoe | Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go | Dale | Mar 29, 2007, 3:38 pm |
| Not the enthusiasm.... | Gill Fin | Mar 29, 2007, 2:53 pm |
| RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go | adjusterjoe | Mar 29, 2007, 2:14 pm |
| RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go | Dale | Mar 29, 2007, 1:58 pm |
| 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go | Gill Fin | Mar 29, 2007, 1:54 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... | Dale | Mar 29, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Putz... | adjusterjoe | Mar 29, 2007, 1:27 pm |
| RE: Really, its not about the money | Mark | Mar 29, 2007, 1:01 pm |
| RE: RE: Putz... | Mark | Mar 29, 2007, 12:59 pm |
| RE: RE: Putz... | Mark | Mar 29, 2007, 12:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo | adjusterjoe | Mar 29, 2007, 12:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. | Mark | Mar 29, 2007, 12:21 pm |
| RE: Putz... | adjusterjoe | Mar 29, 2007, 12:00 pm |
| Putz... | Mark | Mar 29, 2007, 11:52 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 5:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 5:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 5:04 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 5:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 4:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 3:18 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | dale.gilliland.L932@statefarm. | Mar 28, 2007, 3:15 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 3:13 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 3:12 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 3:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Sorry | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 3:07 pm |
| RE: RE: Sorry | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 3:03 pm |
| RE: Sorry | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 3:02 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Dale, a question | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 3:01 pm |
| Oh Yeah | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 3:00 pm |
| Sorry | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 2:59 pm |
| RE: RE: Dale, a question | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 2:58 pm |
| RE: Dale, a question | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 2:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about th | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 2:45 pm |
| Dale, a question | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 2:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 2:36 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. | Dale | Mar 28, 2007, 2:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. RE | adjusterjoe | Mar 28, 2007, 1:20 pm |
| lazy, cheap, and stupid | Cliff | Mar 28, 2007, 12:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY | Dale | Mar 27, 2007, 8:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! | Skit | Mar 26, 2007, 7:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! | Dale | Mar 26, 2007, 4:02 pm |
| RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! | Chuck | Mar 26, 2007, 3:56 pm |
| RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! | Dale | Mar 26, 2007, 3:32 pm |
| Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! | Gill Fin | Mar 26, 2007, 3:12 pm |
| Hmmm | Sam | Mar 26, 2007, 1:41 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: Putz...
You seem like a typical insurance industry hating putz. Some of the comments you have made lead me to believe you are either one of the Rigsby sisters or part of the Scruggs Katrina Group. Either way, you would be a scumbag in my book.
I suspect you are not an independent adjuster, but rather a public adjuster. Your hatred of State Farm makes me think that they were unwilling to pay additional amounts on claims to cover your exorbitant fees.
It is obvious to me that you do not know how to interpret anti-concurrent causation language, or how to apply that language to a loss scenario.