Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

Sen. Lott Undecided Whether to Settle or Go to Trial On Katrina Claim

Southeast News • March 26, 2007
U.S. Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., who sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. for refusing to cover Hurricane Katrina's damage to his Gulf Coast home, said last week that he is weighing a settlement ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Putz...

Posted On: March 29, 2007, 1:27 pm CDT
Posted By: adjusterjoe
Comment:
Talk about someone trying to justify their position. It has been ajudicated and the ruling went against your position and now your opinion is right and the court's is wrong? Maybe we should shut down our courts and allow Mark to adjuticate everything. Unfortunately, it is clowns such as you that bring a bad name to our industry. Please provide proof there are over 1000 suits against other carriers, other than State Farm and Nationwide, where they are standing up for denying slab cases in their entireity. I have handled claims in situtions like this over the years and have ALWAYS paid the slab cases their applicable wind damage. Yes, even in Katrina in Mississippi!! Again, you need to learn more about the insurance industry if you wish to be a responsible part of it. Tell Dale hello and thanks for bringing in the local State Fram staff adjuster, who has not a clue (that would be you Mark). And why do you not address the problem State Farm has with making bad case law for the insurance industry.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 4, 2007, 4:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Apr 4, 2007, 12:18 pm
To Mary B. Jewel
Apr 2, 2007, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 2, 2007, 3:00 pm
RE: Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Def Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:24 pm
Thank God For Trial Lawyers! Gerry
Apr 2, 2007, 11:33 am
Win & They Appeal: Settle for a Larger sum & Move On Lady Liberty
Mar 31, 2007, 9:01 pm
Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Defraud GOD
Mar 30, 2007, 8:11 pm
BTW adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:22 pm
RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:19 pm
RE: Putz... Mary B.
Mar 30, 2007, 2:12 pm
Let's look at it adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 9:17 am
What about Homes that still remain but in pieces ? Homeless without a Slab
Mar 29, 2007, 7:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 5:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 5:08 pm
RE: Not the enthusiasm.... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 4:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:38 pm
Not the enthusiasm.... Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 2:14 pm
RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:58 pm
295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 1:27 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 1:01 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:59 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:21 pm
RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:00 pm
Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 4:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry dale.gilliland.L932@statefarm.
Mar 28, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:12 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:03 pm
RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:01 pm
Oh Yeah adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:00 pm
Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:59 pm
RE: RE: Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:58 pm
RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about th Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:45 pm
Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. RE adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:20 pm
lazy, cheap, and stupid Cliff
Mar 28, 2007, 12:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY Dale
Mar 27, 2007, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Skit
Mar 26, 2007, 7:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 4:02 pm
RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Chuck
Mar 26, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 3:32 pm
Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Gill Fin
Mar 26, 2007, 3:12 pm
Hmmm Sam
Mar 26, 2007, 1:41 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.