Home > Talkback
Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

Sen. Lott Undecided Whether to Settle or Go to Trial On Katrina Claim

Southeast News • March 26, 2007
U.S. Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., who sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. for refusing to cover Hurricane Katrina's damage to his Gulf Coast home, said last week that he is weighing a settlement ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Let's look at it

Posted On: March 30, 2007, 9:17 am CDT
Posted By: adjusterjoe
Comment:
Thousands upon thousands of cases. State Farm & Nationwide refuse to pay wind damage. Their clients include a US Senator, a US Congressman, and a Federal Judge. They now settle with the Federal Judge yesterday and making overtures towards settling with the Senator. State Farm has yet to win one of these cases, but Mark says the great and mighty State Farm is right and the others are wrong. Where are the other high profile homeowners? Oh my, they had other than State Farm or Nationwide and their claims were settled based upon policy language and prior jurisprudence. But we are still to believe State Farm is a "Good Neighbor?" I don't think so.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 4, 2007, 4:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Apr 4, 2007, 12:18 pm
To Mary B. Jewel
Apr 2, 2007, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 2, 2007, 3:00 pm
RE: Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Def Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:24 pm
Thank God For Trial Lawyers! Gerry
Apr 2, 2007, 11:33 am
Win & They Appeal: Settle for a Larger sum & Move On Lady Liberty
Mar 31, 2007, 9:01 pm
Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Defraud GOD
Mar 30, 2007, 8:11 pm
BTW adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:22 pm
RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:19 pm
RE: Putz... Mary B.
Mar 30, 2007, 2:12 pm
Let's look at it adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 9:17 am
What about Homes that still remain but in pieces ? Homeless without a Slab
Mar 29, 2007, 7:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 5:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 5:08 pm
RE: Not the enthusiasm.... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 4:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:38 pm
Not the enthusiasm.... Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 2:14 pm
RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:58 pm
295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 1:27 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 1:01 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:59 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:21 pm
RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:00 pm
Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 4:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry dale.gilliland.L932@statefarm.
Mar 28, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:12 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:03 pm
RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:01 pm
Oh Yeah adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:00 pm
Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:59 pm
RE: RE: Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:58 pm
RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about th Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:45 pm
Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. RE adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:20 pm
lazy, cheap, and stupid Cliff
Mar 28, 2007, 12:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY Dale
Mar 27, 2007, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Skit
Mar 26, 2007, 7:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 4:02 pm
RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Chuck
Mar 26, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 3:32 pm
Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Gill Fin
Mar 26, 2007, 3:12 pm
Hmmm Sam
Mar 26, 2007, 1:41 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.