Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

38 More Miss. Katrina Suits Settled in Mediation, Judge Reports

Southeast News • April 6, 2007
Thirty-eight more Hurricane Katrina insurance cases of Mississippi residents have been settled during court-order mediation, says U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter Jr. More mediations will begin in ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: Very interesting

Posted On: April 8, 2007, 10:01 pm CDT
Posted By: David
Comment:
Good point Mark....Maybe the Insurance Journal can post an article advising that State Farm has settled all their claims. Then all future articles everyone can start bashing the other companies or maybe all the State Farm bashers will actually go back to work for their employers and actually be productive. I have found thru reading most of the posted comments from people they really don't know what their talking about. Most of the information is media driven and only stirs up contraversy.
The insurance policy is a contract that has been approved by the insurance commissioners of each state. They are aware of the language in the policy and yet they still approved it. State Farm had actuaries set a premium based on the policy. It's not State Farm or other insurance companies don't want to cover this damage, they just want to be able to apply the correct premium to cover such a catastrophe. It now appears because of the courts uncertainity to apply the contract language, the citizens of Mississippi will be left with a few less insurance providers which will cause an increase in all lines of insurance due to less competition and the coastal prices will go thru the roof. Good job Senter, and Hood.....best get your resume's updated because you will be looking for a new job when this all settles down.
Subject Posted By Posted On
What adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 4:11 pm
David Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: The fact David
Apr 16, 2007, 3:45 pm
RE: Hey David... David
Apr 16, 2007, 3:37 pm
Hey David... Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:24 pm
RE: RE: The fact adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: The fact David
Apr 16, 2007, 3:08 pm
The fact adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 2:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal David
Apr 16, 2007, 12:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal adjusterjoe
Apr 13, 2007, 5:15 pm
RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal Sam
Apr 13, 2007, 5:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: David... David
Apr 13, 2007, 3:35 pm
RE: RE: David... B
Apr 13, 2007, 2:29 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... Mary B.
Apr 13, 2007, 2:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... David
Apr 13, 2007, 2:01 pm
David... Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 12:10 pm
RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... adjusterjoe
Apr 13, 2007, 12:04 pm
RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal David
Apr 13, 2007, 11:50 am
RE: Pot... meet kettle... David
Apr 13, 2007, 11:48 am
Pot... meet kettle... Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 9:54 am
To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal Morgan
Apr 13, 2007, 9:50 am
RE: RE: Hey everyone, I figured it out! adjusterjoe
Apr 13, 2007, 9:35 am
RE: Hey everyone, I figured it out! David
Apr 13, 2007, 8:07 am
Hey everyone, I figured it out! Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 7:46 am
RE: RE: RE: You should Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 7:37 am
RE: RE: You should adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 4:43 pm
RE: You should Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 3:34 pm
You should adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 3:27 pm
Joe, you know... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:38 pm
RE: Joe, you're a schmo :) Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:35 pm
Joe, you're a schmo :) Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:33 pm
It is impossible adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 1:33 pm
ion Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:05 pm
Re: It is obvious... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 12:59 pm
It is obvious adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 12:28 pm
adjusterjoe is SO dumb... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 11:35 am
This is adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 11:07 am
RE: Hello 1%.................... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 8:17 am
Hello 1%.................... David
Apr 11, 2007, 5:33 pm
Adjusterjoe, come out come out wherever you are Jewel
Apr 11, 2007, 11:47 am
RE: adjusterjoe got fired... David
Apr 10, 2007, 11:02 pm
adjusterjoe got fired... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 3:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... David
Apr 10, 2007, 3:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... Mary B.
Apr 10, 2007, 2:52 pm
Adjusterjoe, put down the broom... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 1:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: Hmm... Mark
Apr 10, 2007, 1:20 pm
Oh poor, poor adjusterjoe Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 11:09 am
RE: RE: Hmm... adjusterjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 11:03 am
RE: Hmm... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 10:43 am
RE: Hmm... adjusterjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 10:18 am
Hmm... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 9:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 9:39 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjustrjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 8:59 am
RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... David
Apr 10, 2007, 8:17 am
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 10:28 pm
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 10:16 pm
RE: Just out of curiosity... David
Apr 9, 2007, 8:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... david
Apr 9, 2007, 7:27 pm
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 2:37 pm
RE: Just out of curiosity... Mary B.
Apr 9, 2007, 2:24 pm
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjustrjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 12:29 pm
RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 12:26 pm
Just out of curiosity... Jewel
Apr 9, 2007, 12:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Very interesting The Insurance Man
Apr 9, 2007, 10:33 am
RE: RE: RE: Very interesting adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 9:55 am
RE: RE: Very interesting David
Apr 8, 2007, 10:01 pm
RE: Very interesting Mark
Apr 7, 2007, 2:32 pm
Very interesting The Insurance Man
Apr 6, 2007, 5:55 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.