Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
38 More Miss. Katrina Suits Settled in Mediation, Judge Reports
Southeast News • April 6, 2007
Thirty-eight more Hurricane Katrina insurance cases of Mississippi residents have been settled during court-order mediation, says U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter Jr.
More mediations will begin in ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| What | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 4:11 pm |
| David | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: The fact | David | Apr 16, 2007, 3:45 pm |
| RE: Hey David... | David | Apr 16, 2007, 3:37 pm |
| Hey David... | Jewel | Apr 16, 2007, 3:24 pm |
| RE: RE: The fact | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| RE: The fact | David | Apr 16, 2007, 3:08 pm |
| The fact | adjusterjoe | Apr 16, 2007, 2:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal | David | Apr 16, 2007, 12:47 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal | adjusterjoe | Apr 13, 2007, 5:15 pm |
| RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal | Sam | Apr 13, 2007, 5:01 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: David... | David | Apr 13, 2007, 3:35 pm |
| RE: RE: David... | B | Apr 13, 2007, 2:29 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... | Mary B. | Apr 13, 2007, 2:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... | David | Apr 13, 2007, 2:01 pm |
| David... | Jewel | Apr 13, 2007, 12:10 pm |
| RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... | adjusterjoe | Apr 13, 2007, 12:04 pm |
| RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal | David | Apr 13, 2007, 11:50 am |
| RE: Pot... meet kettle... | David | Apr 13, 2007, 11:48 am |
| Pot... meet kettle... | Jewel | Apr 13, 2007, 9:54 am |
| To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal | Morgan | Apr 13, 2007, 9:50 am |
| RE: RE: Hey everyone, I figured it out! | adjusterjoe | Apr 13, 2007, 9:35 am |
| RE: Hey everyone, I figured it out! | David | Apr 13, 2007, 8:07 am |
| Hey everyone, I figured it out! | Jewel | Apr 13, 2007, 7:46 am |
| RE: RE: RE: You should | Jewel | Apr 13, 2007, 7:37 am |
| RE: RE: You should | adjusterjoe | Apr 12, 2007, 4:43 pm |
| RE: You should | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 3:34 pm |
| You should | adjusterjoe | Apr 12, 2007, 3:27 pm |
| Joe, you know... | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| RE: Joe, you're a schmo :) | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 1:35 pm |
| Joe, you're a schmo :) | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| It is impossible | adjusterjoe | Apr 12, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| ion | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 1:05 pm |
| Re: It is obvious... | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 12:59 pm |
| It is obvious | adjusterjoe | Apr 12, 2007, 12:28 pm |
| adjusterjoe is SO dumb... | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 11:35 am |
| This is | adjusterjoe | Apr 12, 2007, 11:07 am |
| RE: Hello 1%.................... | Jewel | Apr 12, 2007, 8:17 am |
| Hello 1%.................... | David | Apr 11, 2007, 5:33 pm |
| Adjusterjoe, come out come out wherever you are | Jewel | Apr 11, 2007, 11:47 am |
| RE: adjusterjoe got fired... | David | Apr 10, 2007, 11:02 pm |
| adjusterjoe got fired... | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 3:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | David | Apr 10, 2007, 3:19 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | Mary B. | Apr 10, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| Adjusterjoe, put down the broom... | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 1:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Hmm... | Mark | Apr 10, 2007, 1:20 pm |
| Oh poor, poor adjusterjoe | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 11:09 am |
| RE: RE: Hmm... | adjusterjoe | Apr 10, 2007, 11:03 am |
| RE: Hmm... | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 10:43 am |
| RE: Hmm... | adjusterjoe | Apr 10, 2007, 10:18 am |
| Hmm... | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 9:54 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | adjusterjoe | Apr 10, 2007, 9:39 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | adjustrjoe | Apr 10, 2007, 8:59 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | David | Apr 10, 2007, 8:17 am |
| RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | adjusterjoe | Apr 9, 2007, 10:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | adjusterjoe | Apr 9, 2007, 10:16 pm |
| RE: Just out of curiosity... | David | Apr 9, 2007, 8:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | david | Apr 9, 2007, 7:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | adjusterjoe | Apr 9, 2007, 2:37 pm |
| RE: Just out of curiosity... | Mary B. | Apr 9, 2007, 2:24 pm |
| RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... | adjustrjoe | Apr 9, 2007, 12:29 pm |
| RE: Just out of curiosity... | adjusterjoe | Apr 9, 2007, 12:26 pm |
| Just out of curiosity... | Jewel | Apr 9, 2007, 12:13 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Very interesting | The Insurance Man | Apr 9, 2007, 10:33 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Very interesting | adjusterjoe | Apr 9, 2007, 9:55 am |
| RE: RE: Very interesting | David | Apr 8, 2007, 10:01 pm |
| RE: Very interesting | Mark | Apr 7, 2007, 2:32 pm |
| Very interesting | The Insurance Man | Apr 6, 2007, 5:55 pm |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: Hmm...
All you have to do is check the archives of this site to see no slab cases have been won by State Farm or Nationwide. There have only been 4-6 slab cases go to trial and none have been won by State Farm. Court records are public, not hidden. The federal district court in Mississippi has records open to the public. Do you honestly think that the news media would not report it if State Farm won a case. Call the US district court and ask if there have been any rulings in favor of State Farm. Now have there been settled slab cases? Yes, under the heading of this article. I would welcome anyone to to provide proof where State Farm has won a slab case. The only reason State Fram is now settling cases is to avoid punitive damages.
As far as finding anotehr carrier denying slab cases, it is a legitimate qestion. I have researched and cannot find one. If State Farm is so righteous, then why did not any other carriers follow their lead?
It is dificult to show those like you, who openly admit they have no knowledge, the truth. You are in the insurance industry and loyal, which is understandable. The reality is that this is not an abberation about State Farm. It is their normal and usual arrogant attitude.