Home > Talkback
Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

38 More Miss. Katrina Suits Settled in Mediation, Judge Reports

Southeast News • April 6, 2007
Thirty-eight more Hurricane Katrina insurance cases of Mississippi residents have been settled during court-order mediation, says U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter Jr. More mediations will begin in ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: Adjusterjoe, come out come out wherever you are

Posted On: April 11, 2007, 11:47 am CDT
Posted By: Jewel
Comment:
"In the Broussard case State Farm was unable to offer substantial evidence that would have allowed the jury to apportion the total loss between covered windstorm forces and excluded water damage. In more recent cases, including Gemmill and Williams, State Farm was able to offer such proof. In all cases, State Farm has a right to offer any evidence it wishes to support its view of the relevant facts, and this right is part of the most fundamental requirements of due process, in my view." L.T. Senter, Jr. Senior Judge

Well, I guess adjusterjoe hasn't been back since he figured out he was so very wrong. They may have denied slab cases 100% (not that adjusterjoe has backed up that figure) but apparently this shows that in 66% of the cases (granted, this only takes into account 3 cases) State Farm was right.

Lo and behold! A shock... hmm...

Adjusterjoe- where are you???
Subject Posted By Posted On
What adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 4:11 pm
David Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: The fact David
Apr 16, 2007, 3:45 pm
RE: Hey David... David
Apr 16, 2007, 3:37 pm
Hey David... Jewel
Apr 16, 2007, 3:24 pm
RE: RE: The fact adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 3:17 pm
RE: The fact David
Apr 16, 2007, 3:08 pm
The fact adjusterjoe
Apr 16, 2007, 2:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal David
Apr 16, 2007, 12:47 pm
RE: RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal adjusterjoe
Apr 13, 2007, 5:15 pm
RE: RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal Sam
Apr 13, 2007, 5:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: David... David
Apr 13, 2007, 3:35 pm
RE: RE: David... B
Apr 13, 2007, 2:29 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... Mary B.
Apr 13, 2007, 2:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... David
Apr 13, 2007, 2:01 pm
David... Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 12:10 pm
RE: RE: Pot... meet kettle... adjusterjoe
Apr 13, 2007, 12:04 pm
RE: To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal David
Apr 13, 2007, 11:50 am
RE: Pot... meet kettle... David
Apr 13, 2007, 11:48 am
Pot... meet kettle... Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 9:54 am
To Jewel, Adjusterjoe, Dave, etal Morgan
Apr 13, 2007, 9:50 am
RE: RE: Hey everyone, I figured it out! adjusterjoe
Apr 13, 2007, 9:35 am
RE: Hey everyone, I figured it out! David
Apr 13, 2007, 8:07 am
Hey everyone, I figured it out! Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 7:46 am
RE: RE: RE: You should Jewel
Apr 13, 2007, 7:37 am
RE: RE: You should adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 4:43 pm
RE: You should Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 3:34 pm
You should adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 3:27 pm
Joe, you know... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:38 pm
RE: Joe, you're a schmo :) Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:35 pm
Joe, you're a schmo :) Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:33 pm
It is impossible adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 1:33 pm
ion Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 1:05 pm
Re: It is obvious... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 12:59 pm
It is obvious adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 12:28 pm
adjusterjoe is SO dumb... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 11:35 am
This is adjusterjoe
Apr 12, 2007, 11:07 am
RE: Hello 1%.................... Jewel
Apr 12, 2007, 8:17 am
Hello 1%.................... David
Apr 11, 2007, 5:33 pm
Adjusterjoe, come out come out wherever you are Jewel
Apr 11, 2007, 11:47 am
RE: adjusterjoe got fired... David
Apr 10, 2007, 11:02 pm
adjusterjoe got fired... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 3:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... David
Apr 10, 2007, 3:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... Mary B.
Apr 10, 2007, 2:52 pm
Adjusterjoe, put down the broom... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 1:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: Hmm... Mark
Apr 10, 2007, 1:20 pm
Oh poor, poor adjusterjoe Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 11:09 am
RE: RE: Hmm... adjusterjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 11:03 am
RE: Hmm... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 10:43 am
RE: Hmm... adjusterjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 10:18 am
Hmm... Jewel
Apr 10, 2007, 9:54 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 9:39 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjustrjoe
Apr 10, 2007, 8:59 am
RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... David
Apr 10, 2007, 8:17 am
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 10:28 pm
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 10:16 pm
RE: Just out of curiosity... David
Apr 9, 2007, 8:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... david
Apr 9, 2007, 7:27 pm
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 2:37 pm
RE: Just out of curiosity... Mary B.
Apr 9, 2007, 2:24 pm
RE: RE: Just out of curiosity... adjustrjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 12:29 pm
RE: Just out of curiosity... adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 12:26 pm
Just out of curiosity... Jewel
Apr 9, 2007, 12:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Very interesting The Insurance Man
Apr 9, 2007, 10:33 am
RE: RE: RE: Very interesting adjusterjoe
Apr 9, 2007, 9:55 am
RE: RE: Very interesting David
Apr 8, 2007, 10:01 pm
RE: Very interesting Mark
Apr 7, 2007, 2:32 pm
Very interesting The Insurance Man
Apr 6, 2007, 5:55 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.