Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Insurers Slam Florida Citizens Expansion Bill
Southeast News April 10, 2007
The larger the Citizens Property Insurance Corp. becomes, the greater the financial crisis that could occur when a major storm hits Florida, insurers cautioned this week.
That message from the ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Rate difference | Linda | Apr 16, 2007, 1:04 pm |
| I told you so!!! | another bob | Apr 16, 2007, 12:41 pm |
| What a mess bureaucrats create | Rich | Apr 16, 2007, 12:32 pm |
| RE: Citizens Makes A Profit!! | Tom | Apr 16, 2007, 12:29 pm |
| Rate difference | WK | Apr 16, 2007, 12:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Citizens Makes A Profit!! | Tom | Apr 16, 2007, 12:26 pm |
| Re: I told you so | Skeptical | Apr 11, 2007, 10:44 am |
| I told you so | Larry Burkhead | Apr 11, 2007, 10:18 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Citizens Makes A Profit!! | Linda | Apr 11, 2007, 10:15 am |
| RE: RE: Citizens Makes A Profit!! | Dawn | Apr 11, 2007, 9:52 am |
| RE: Citizens Makes A Profit!! | Mike | Apr 11, 2007, 9:39 am |
| Citizens Makes A Profit!! | Ancient City | Apr 11, 2007, 8:41 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Cost per square foot. | KAT | Apr 11, 2007, 8:37 am |
| RE: RE: Cost per square foot. | Dawn | Apr 11, 2007, 8:29 am |
| w234@ | wkj lr | Apr 11, 2007, 2:24 am |
| bail out | Make the call!! | Apr 11, 2007, 1:45 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: bail out | Faith | Apr 11, 2007, 1:37 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: bail out | You choose | Apr 10, 2007, 10:45 pm |
| ?' | History | Apr 10, 2007, 9:28 pm |
| And if the PLASTIC PIPE'S MELT IN THE FOUNDATION?' | Fred F. | Apr 10, 2007, 5:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Cost per square foot. | nne | Apr 10, 2007, 5:24 pm |
| RE: Cost per square foot. | Bob | Apr 10, 2007, 3:51 pm |
| RE: RE: Cost per square foot. | Retail Florida Agent | Apr 10, 2007, 3:50 pm |
| RE: RE: Cost per square foot. | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 3:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: bail out | Joe Johnson | Apr 10, 2007, 3:48 pm |
| RE: Cost per square foot. | Still another Bob | Apr 10, 2007, 3:43 pm |
| Cost per square foot. | Florida Retail Agent | Apr 10, 2007, 3:27 pm |
| Solution to the problem. | Florida Retail Agent | Apr 10, 2007, 3:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Question Bob , | Joe Johnson | Apr 10, 2007, 3:18 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: bail out | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 3:15 pm |
| RE: RE: bail out | OmniSure | Apr 10, 2007, 3:13 pm |
| RE: RE: bail out | Jewel | Apr 10, 2007, 3:10 pm |
| Right On SWFL Homeowner | Linda | Apr 10, 2007, 3:08 pm |
| RE: bail out | SWFL homeowner | Apr 10, 2007, 2:59 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Question Bob , | PLJ | Apr 10, 2007, 2:35 pm |
| bail out | another bob | Apr 10, 2007, 2:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Question Bob , | Joe Johnson | Apr 10, 2007, 2:03 pm |
| RE: RE: Question Bob , | Craig | Apr 10, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| RE: Question Bob , | Linda | Apr 10, 2007, 1:24 pm |
| Choice / FIGA | Danny | Apr 10, 2007, 1:22 pm |
| Question Bob , | Just wondering | Apr 10, 2007, 1:06 pm |
| Which Company | Bob | Apr 10, 2007, 11:37 am |
| RE: Which company to choose? | Someone Who Has Reason to Know | Apr 10, 2007, 10:35 am |
| Which company to choose? | SWFL homeowner | Apr 10, 2007, 9:57 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: bail out
Co. said today it settled claims of more than 100 policyholders who
accused the company of trimming coverage about a decade before the 1994
Northridge earthquake. The Bloomington, Ill.-based insurer would not
confirm a newspaper report that the policyholders received $100 million
to drop their lawsuit, or divulge other details of the agreement reached
last November. "The settlement amount is confidential, as agreed to by
all parties, but represents a small part of the more than $3 billion
paid by State Farm to more than 117,000 policyholders whose property was
damaged," a company statement said. The settlement is the largest known
single payout by an insurer involved in post-earthquake claims, the Los
Angeles Times reported. According to an internal company memo in
September 1984, executives considered informing policyholders about
restructuring plans but decided against it because it would "appear
inconsistent with our marketing philosophy."
Company Used Muddled Terms The lawsuit said two insurance plans were
ultimately replaced by a less expensive policy, and the company
eliminated the notion of "guaranteed replacement," which would require
the insurer to replace homes destroyed by a quake even if the cost
surpassed a policyholder's coverage limit. Instead, State Farm sent
policyholders notices that described the coverage as "new" or different"
without disclosing that it amounted to less coverage, according to the
lawsuit filed by 117 homeowners. In May 1997, a Superior Court judge
How is this not wrong? Melanie