Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Miss.: Scruggs Files Racketeering Charges against State Farm
Southeast News June 20, 2007
The Scruggs Katrina Group filed federal charges against State Farm, E.A. Renfroe Company, and Forensic Analysis and Engineering Company on behalf of 21 Mississippi policyholders whose homes were ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: STATE FARM blackmailing me to defraud MEDICARE | Liz | Jun 1, 2008, 5:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry | PROOF | Jul 4, 2007, 12:03 pm |
| File a Wrongful Termination Suit, it's the perfect time | Betrayed Me & You & Everyone | Jun 30, 2007, 3:48 pm |
| Draw your own conclusions | Betrayed2 | Jun 30, 2007, 12:22 pm |
| Pops RE: Insurance Industry Highmindedness | Roger Poe | Jun 30, 2007, 9:10 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry | Pops N Tennessee | Jun 29, 2007, 6:37 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry | Jun 29, 2007, 4:58 pm |
|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry | You Can't Handle the Truth! | Jun 29, 2007, 2:44 pm |
| "Pops" - State Farm DID Mislead Hurricane Rita Victim | Roger Poe | Jun 28, 2007, 1:06 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry/Comment: | Jun 25, 2007, 9:22 pm |
|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry | adjusterjoe | Jun 25, 2007, 8:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Insurance Industry | LL | Jun 25, 2007, 5:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Insurance Industry | Mr. Obvious | Jun 25, 2007, 1:09 pm |
| RE: Insurance Industry THAK YOU MR OBVIOUS | Jun 25, 2007, 12:34 pm |
|
| RE: Web has proof | Jun 25, 2007, 11:53 am |
|
| - State Farm DID Mislead Hurricane Rita Victim (BAD FAITH- | Victim | Jun 25, 2007, 11:23 am |
| Whats beautiful about this. | The beauty | Jun 25, 2007, 1:08 am |
| RE: Mr. Freed - State Farm DID Mislead Hurricane Rita Victim | Pops N Tennessee | Jun 23, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| RE: RE: Insurance Industry | The Other Mark | Jun 23, 2007, 3:05 pm |
| RE: Insurance Industry | Ma Barker & Gangsters of S/F | Jun 22, 2007, 9:54 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Scruggs apologists | Mark | Jun 22, 2007, 5:07 pm |
| Here are some facts about State Farm | Rich Pyorre | Jun 22, 2007, 4:05 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Scruggs apologists | adjusterjoe | Jun 22, 2007, 2:30 pm |
| Give | adjusterjoe | Jun 22, 2007, 2:27 pm |
| RE: Mr. Freed - State Farm DID Mislead Hurricane Rita Victim | Jun 22, 2007, 1:44 pm |
|
| Mr. Freed - State Farm DID Mislead Hurricane Rita Victims | Roger Poe | Jun 22, 2007, 1:30 pm |
| Insurance Industry | Mr. Obvious | Jun 22, 2007, 12:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Scruggs apologists | Mark | Jun 22, 2007, 12:47 pm |
| RE: Scruggs apologists | adjusterjoe | Jun 22, 2007, 11:55 am |
| Web has proof | Bill | Jun 22, 2007, 11:42 am |
| Scruggs apologists | Mark | Jun 22, 2007, 11:38 am |
| The Truth Hurts - State Farm Did This & it's Pay Back Time | Denied by State Farm | Jun 22, 2007, 9:14 am |
| RE: RE: gill them so more | Jun 22, 2007, 8:39 am |
|
| "the law firm has proof that State Farm | Jun 22, 2007, 8:37 am |
|
| RE: RE: gill them so more | Jun 22, 2007, 8:34 am |
|
| RE: gill them so more | Willy | Jun 22, 2007, 8:31 am |
| gill them so more | Jun 22, 2007, 8:23 am |
|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: aunti & gill | aunti everything | Jun 22, 2007, 6:38 am |
| RICO meetings held in the LOBBY with Suits & Titles | Ma Barker & Gangsters of S/F | Jun 21, 2007, 9:58 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: aunti & gill | adjusterjoe | Jun 21, 2007, 9:38 pm |
| RE: RE: aunti & gill | Kim David | Jun 21, 2007, 9:33 pm |
| RE: RE: aunti & gill | aunti everything | Jun 21, 2007, 7:30 pm |
| RE: aunti & gill | aunti everything | Jun 21, 2007, 7:28 pm |
| aunti & gill | adjusterjoe | Jun 21, 2007, 4:21 pm |
| RE: RE: Scruggs | aunti everything | Jun 21, 2007, 3:50 pm |
| RE: Scruggs | Mary B. | Jun 21, 2007, 3:43 pm |
| RE: If State Farm uses no necks.... | Willy | Jun 21, 2007, 3:40 pm |
| If State Farm uses no necks.... | Gill Fin | Jun 21, 2007, 3:21 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Civil or criminal? | aunti everything | Jun 21, 2007, 2:10 pm |
| RE: RE: Civil or criminal? | Willy | Jun 21, 2007, 1:20 pm |
| RE: Go Scruggs Go! Denounce Them By Name | Andrew | Jun 21, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| RE: Maybe this will cause further investigation into State F | jg | Jun 21, 2007, 1:11 pm |
| Go Scruggs Go! Denounce Them By Name | Kim David | Jun 21, 2007, 12:54 pm |
| RE: Civil or criminal? | adjusterjoe | Jun 21, 2007, 10:08 am |
| Civil or criminal? | Another guy named Rick | Jun 21, 2007, 9:23 am |
| RE: Scruggs | aunti everything | Jun 21, 2007, 8:55 am |
| Scruggs | Rick | Jun 21, 2007, 8:49 am |
| Maybe this will cause further investigation into State Farm | Rich Pyorre | Jun 20, 2007, 6:49 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: "Pops" - State Farm DID Mislead Hurricane Rita Victim
Hurricane force [74+MPH] winds PLUS 25%+ higher wind gusts and other individual "winds within the wind" commonly create a environment that by its very nature is abrasive to roof coverings and other structural components.
Flying micro-projectiles (dull, sharp, or otherwise) leave their own unique "fingerprints" on surfaces, such as fiberglass shingles, painted surfaces, guttering surfaces, window frames/glass, AC Unit cooling foils, garage doors, fencing finishes, vehicles, etc.
The older the roofing system, the more clear the effects of the wind generated abrasive action.
Forensically these abrasive "fingerprints" are VERY different from heat and moisture damage.
After witnessing at least 12 catastrophes [that I too have witnessed] ones can be certain that Allstate and State Farm know these actual loss claim issues quite well.
In fact, bizarrely, the tar sealant bond damage was recognized in Louisiana after hurricane Katrina, but not in SE Texas after hurricane Rita.
Also, critically high wind detaches a shingle from the one below it by pushing/pulling on the outside ends of the shingle, eventually BREAKING the tar tab bonding material that is designed to create a monolithic wind/weather tight roof covering.
That type of "unordinary" high wind induced damage, verses long-term "normal" environmental "wear and tear" damage is VERY different, forensically.
Too, suddenly, PARTIALLY, and consistently uniform/detached shingles lifted on one end by the directional winds, and shimmed up with wind borne debris, creating a visual/physical "zipper" effect is not to be mistaken with long term 'heat build-up' or 'moisture' damage markers.
ALL in place/post high wind storm affected roofing systems should be HAND checked (by a seasoned post storm construction professional) for their ACTUAL physical integrity, as they very may not make it through another critical wind/storm event, and all that that can mean...
Admittingly I don't know it all "Pops", however I myself don't attempt to give anyone misinformation, and like yourself, also encourage ALL insurer trusting consumers to research even your "facts" so as to weigh out what manufacturers and nature and their own home have to say about actual post hurricane/wind storm damage, verses everyday damage.
rogerpoegc@gmail.com
P.S. I'm a general contractor that hires roofing contractors.