Miami Airport Terminal Evacuated after Bomb Scare

July 18, 2007

  • July 18, 2007 at 7:50 am
    Anon says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “Possible explosive device” = Ready-to-serve Texas Chilli (you do NOT want to be on a plane with someone when THAT goes off).

  • July 18, 2007 at 8:57 am
    GB says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    This is going to turn out to be nothing of course, and thousands of people’s plans will be messed up as a result. By the time a supervisor and their supervisor look at it and then the evacuation order is issued, it must take a half hour. If it was really a bomb the bad guy would have set it off by then. For a terrorist, blowing up a terminal is probably just as good as blowing up a plane, so what would they care ?

    We have lost sight of logic in our pursuit of safety, and given too much power to unthinking drones.

  • July 20, 2007 at 10:13 am
    stampoutislam says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Days of old had the plague. Now there is a new killer but it is not a germ it is the scourge some try to kill a religion..right. The ramblings of some illiterate, spastic pedophile for some reason (most likely stupidity) that some follow. Let them blow each other. The less there are in the world the better place it will be. Get out of Iraq as soon as possible. A total collapse of their society means that only more Muslims will die as the idiots blow up each other. I can shout with joy..hooray there are that many less of them in the world. We can get rid of them all but what a nice thought.

  • July 20, 2007 at 12:04 pm
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Jim Jones was a Communist, and David Koresh was nuts. (And Koresh had broken no laws, except for suspision of child molestation, which would be okay, you know, like Aisha).

    Even so, every five or ten years someone blows up an abortion clinic or whatever in the name of Christ, but every day we see murder in the name of Allah (who started out as the moon goddesss of Mecca). Is that because Islam is a religion of peace?

    So what do you think of muhammed deflowering his wife Aisha when she was ten years-old, Ali? Is that permissable for Musllims today? It is, isn’t it?

  • July 20, 2007 at 12:18 pm
    Ruth Collins, CPCU says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    We don’t have any Muslims in my neck of the woods. Thanks to your forum, I have been able to make a new friend, Ali. I like to learn about different cultures. I think diversity leads to better relations, and better relations can only benefit my agency and the insureds that I serve.

  • July 21, 2007 at 12:22 pm
    truth says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    you do not need to have formally studied shitslam/is slime/islam to know it is a moral, intellecual and spiritual cancer. It is based on the deranged rantings of a mass murdering paedophile. It mandates violence discrimination and murder. It is by sub humans for sub humans.

  • July 20, 2007 at 12:31 pm
    GB says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    According to Webster; in addition to meaning “from the root or origin” radical also has the meaning ” marked by considerable departure from the usual or traditional” I choose to apply that definition to “radical muslims”

    Just like Christians and the Bible, the idea of a diety’s words being recorded by a man is going to introduce changes in subtle meanings. Those subtle meanings after 2 thousand years can make literal translations very misleading. Its not fair to judge an act from 2000 years ago by todays accepted ideas. While I agree that “deflowering” a 9 year old is pretty extreme, you did refer to her as his wife. Relations when you are married are not extreme, and it wasn’t uncommon for women to be married young in historical times when life expectancies were in the teens or low twenties. I am not condoning the act, just saying that its not fair to judge an act out of its historical context.

  • July 20, 2007 at 12:52 pm
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    1. Arising from or going to a root or source; basic: proposed a radical solution to the problem.
    2. Departing markedly from the usual or customary; extreme: radical opinions on education.
    3. Favoring or effecting fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions: radical political views.
    4. Linguistics Of or being a root: a radical form.
    5. Botany Arising from the root or its crown: radical leaves.
    6. Slang Excellent; wonderful.

    You might as well pick # 6 as #2 in this case. When they blow up the mall or the church you’re in some day, think about this discussion and remember, Ali had no idea what to say in answer to my many specific questions.

  • July 20, 2007 at 1:10 am
    Ali says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “When they blow up the mall or the church you’re in some day, think about this discussion and remember”

    there was no reason for this comment, outside of ignorance or bigotry, Al.

  • July 20, 2007 at 1:10 am
    Jihad Watch says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Jihad Watch reader Al tells me that he got into an exchange on the Insurance Journal website (you just never know where jihad will come up) in which he mentioned Jihad Watch. This was the response from a poster there named Ali:

    “Spencer Katz of jihadwatch is a leading fundraiser for the JDL and affiliated hate groups.”

    Every time I think I’ve heard everything, somebody comes up with another one. For the record, there is no “Spencer Katz” who has anything to do with Jihad Watch. I don’t know anyone named Spencer Katz at all. Maybe Ali meant me, but my name isn’t Katz. And neither I nor anyone else at Jihad Watch has ever raised any money for the JDL. Nor has anyone here raised any money for any hate group.

    Al told Ali this, but of course he was unconvinced:

    “of course he would deny it, as Spencer Katz has been discredited by every respected news organization in Europe.”

    Well, so much the worse for Spencer Katz, whoever he is, but we haven’t been discredited by anyone. Some have tried, but none have succeeded.

    So what of Spencer Katz, the JDL fundraising machine? He is just another example of the fact that those who oppose my work will say anything, no matter how outlandish and false. But for my part, I’m just going to keep telling the truth. Which, of course, is what makes them crazy.

  • July 20, 2007 at 1:14 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Well since Muslims are murdering -and crucifying- Christians daily and burning their churches in the ME, and enslaving them in Sudan, what’s a mall or a church or two over here? What should I have said instead of church or mall, sky scraper or Pentagon?

    So you lied about Sencer Katz being a part of Jihad Watch. Is that Taqqiyah?

  • July 20, 2007 at 1:27 am
    Ali says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called Jihad Watch an “Internet hate site” and said it “is notorious for its depiction of Islam as an inherently violent faith that is a threat to world peace.”

    Guardian writer Brian Whitaker describes Jihad Watch as a “notoriously Islamophobic website”.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad_Watch

  • July 20, 2007 at 1:33 am
    Ali says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    He has no academic training in Islamic studies whatsoever; his M.A. degree was in the field of early Christianity.

  • July 20, 2007 at 1:35 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    ALI>The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called Jihad Watch an “Internet hate site” and said it “is notorious for its depiction of Islam as an inherently violent faith that is a threat to world peace.”

    ALGuardian writer Brian Whitaker describes Jihad Watch as a “notoriously Islamophobic website”.

    AL

  • July 20, 2007 at 1:43 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    CAIR is an expert terrorist front, and the Guardian’s only field of expertise is Posh Spice. But see below.

    http://www.anti-cair-net.org/

    U.S. Senator Richard Durbin: “[CAIR is] unusual in its extreme rhetoric and its associations with groups that are suspect.”

    *U.S. Senator Charles Schumer: “We know [CAIR] has ties to terrorism.”

    From Sept. 2003 Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism,
    Technology and Homeland Security *U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer: “To praise an organization because they haven’t been indicted is like somebody saying, ‘I’m not a crook’.”

    *U.S. Rep. Bill Shuster: “Time and again the organization has shown itself to be nothing more than an apologist for groups bent on the destruction of Israel and Islamic domination over the West.”

    CAIR Employees And Officials Support Terror:

    Senior CAIR employee Randall Todd Royer, a/k/a “Ismail” Royer, pled guilty and was sentenced to twenty years in prison for participating in a network of militant jihadists centered in Northern Virginia. He admitted to aiding and abetting three persons who sought training in a terrorist camp in Pakistan for the purpose of waging jihad against American troops in Afghanistan. Royer’s illegal actions occurred while he was employed with CAIR

    CAIR’s Director of Community Relations, Bassem Khafagi , was arrested by the United States due to his ties with a terror-financing front group. Khafagi pled guilty to charges of visa and bank fraud, and agreed to be deported to Egypt. Khafagi’s illegal actions occurred while he was employed by CAIR.

    On December 18, 2002, Ghassan Elashi, founding board member of CAIR-Texas, a founder of the Holy Land Foundation, and a brother-in-law of Musa Abu Marzook , was arrested by the United States and charged with, among other things, making false statements on export declarations, dealing in the property of a designated terrorist organization, conspiracy
    and money laundering. Ghassan Elashi committed his crimes while working at CAIR, and was found Guilty.

    CAIR Board Member Imam Siraj Wahaj, an un-indicted co-conspirator in the first World Trade Center bombing, has called for replacing the American government with an Islamic caliphate, and warned that America will crumble unless it accepts Islam.

    Rabih Haddad served as a CAIR Fundraiser. Haddad was co-founder of the Global Relief Foundation (“GRF”). GRF was designated by the US Treasury Department for financing the Al Qaida and other terrorist organizations and its assets were frozen by the US Government on December 14, 2001.

    Consistent with Hamas ideology, CAIR has served as a conduit for the distribution of materials and funds from foreign nationals
    to groups and institutions within the United States for the purpose of promoting radical Islam and Hamas ideology, and attacked Islamic clerics and scholars who reject radical Islam and the Hamas agenda.

    As for Mr.Spencer’s qualifications, all he does for the most part is quote Islamic authorities who are interpreting the Koran. So who’s wrong, him or them?

    Some day there will be a cross on the flag of Qatar.

  • July 20, 2007 at 2:21 am
    Ruth Collins, CPCU says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Maybe its just me, but it seems that with a name like Anti-CAIR-net, this might not be the most unbiased resource.

  • July 20, 2007 at 2:33 am
    Sylvia R. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I noticed that too Ruth.

  • July 20, 2007 at 2:46 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ruth, I wouldn’t care if their name was Jimmy Cracked Corn. If what they are saying is true, and it is as far as I can tell, we should all take it to heart.

    Should we be nuetral about cancer? Autism? Birth defects? Diabetes? If I am threatened by cancer, I want a doctor who is anti-cancer. To be anti-CAIR, like being anti-cancer, is a good thing.

    CAIR was recently named as a co-conspirator in a terrorist funding scam. Their corruption is ongoing. How can one be unbiased about an organization that is repeatedly in trouble with the law for involvement with terrorists?

    They are linked to Hamas, a terrorist organization. They would be happy to institute Islamic law in the US if we don’t shut them down and kick them all out soon enough.

    If this is your first exposure to the fact that a terrorist propaganda front is operating openly in our midst, then you should read more on the topic rather than hold your hands over your eyes.

    Fortunately, their paying membership has declined by about 70% in the past couple years, but they still get money from a few sources that prop them up to serve as a mouthpiece for groups and people that want to kill us all.

    If this were 1940, CAIR would be a analogous to Japan’s Black Hand and the German Broderbund. There can be no neutrality.

  • July 20, 2007 at 2:50 am
    Ray says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    First, I am glad that I don’t count Al amoung my acquantances. I have met a few “Al”s in my life and generally tend to avoid their rabble-rousing xenophobic manner.

    Just to think – this all started our about a bomb scare at the Miami airport that turned out to be human ashes.

    I would, from the tenor of his comments, brand Al as a radical (and no radishes need apply) when it comes to his venomous hatred of Muslims. He probably would jump on the anti-Jewish bandwagon if that came along in one of these posts.

  • July 20, 2007 at 2:52 am
    Ali says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    CAIR works in close cooperation with other civic and civil liberties groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, NAACP, Hispanic Unity, Organization of Chinese Americans, Japanese American Citizens League, Sikh Mediawatch and Resource Task Force, among many others. In 2003, the Ohio chapter of the ACLU gave its annual Liberty Flame Award to the Ohio chapter of CAIR “for contributions to the advancement and protection of civil liberties.” [7].

    CAIR has successfully formed partnership with the National Council of Churches and held dialogue with representatives of the National Association of Evangelicals.

  • July 20, 2007 at 2:54 am
    Ruth Collins, CPCU says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    My church is part of the National Council of Churches. If they accept and work with CAIR, how bad can CAIR be?

  • July 20, 2007 at 3:01 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The Federal Council of Churches was shut down after it was exposed as a Communist front operation, only to reopen as the National Council of Churches.

    The ACLU is anti-Christ, so it’s not surprising that it sleeps with CAIR.

    And so on.

    Well, I hope that the people who are awake in this country live long enough to protect those who are asleep, despite themselves. Signing off.

  • July 20, 2007 at 3:14 am
    Ali says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    for reading my writing and allowing me to educate you. I’m glad to know others are getting a TRUE sense of what is means to be Muslim. Please to ignore Al.

  • July 20, 2007 at 3:15 am
    Ray says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I hope Al was telling the truth when he said he was signing off. He reminds me of the old song about the John Birch Society..

    “…There’s no one left but thee and we, and we’re not sure of thee”

  • July 21, 2007 at 3:43 am
    CAIRfreefuture says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ali, you are merely an apologist for the same Islamic extremism that plotted and executed the attacks on 9/11. If Saudi-funded groups like CAIR continue to neutralize our attempts to fight the war against Jihad and “peaceful Muslims” like you continue to support them, then you are just as likely as the extremists to be rounded up and placed in detention camps if another 9/11 style attack happens on U.S. soil!!

  • July 21, 2007 at 3:53 am
    CAIRfreefuture says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You forgot to point out that your beloved CAIR was recently named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terror case!!

    They have also seen their membership rolls plummet from over 29,000 in 2000 to just over 1,800 in 2006!! That is because they are out of touch with freedom-loving muslims like you claim to be!! They depend on Saudi wahhabists for their financial backing, including the construction of their $3.5 million headquarters building in D.C.

    So if you serious about being a moderate, freedom-loving Muslim, you need to renounce your membership in CAIR and stop being an apologist for them and other radical Islamic front groups!!

    http://www.terrorfreefuture.blogspot.com/

  • July 21, 2007 at 4:02 am
    CAIRfreefuture says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Do your homework, Ruth and you wont be so eager to participate in your little “diversity” lovefest with a guy who you trust without knowing just because it fits your little touchy-feely “we are the world” mindset!! If the Jihadists win this war, Islamist sympathizers like yourself will have no immunity from having your throat slashed by the same people you are trying to stick up for—you are still an INFIDEL to them, just like all the rest of us non-Muslims!! The trouble with liberalism is that it relies too much on mushy feelings and “warm fuzzies” and not enough on logic and rationality!!

  • July 21, 2007 at 4:09 am
    CAIRfreefuture says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You dont need to even need to have ANY college degree to speak or write the truth!! So your desperate attempt to dismiss him for “lack of credentials” is merely a matter of shooting the messenger so you can disregard the message!! About what I would expect from a junior Jihadist like yourself, which is essentially what CAIR members truly are, unless you happen to be one of the full-fledged Jihadist apologists on their team!!

  • July 21, 2007 at 7:10 am
    Common Sense says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Well, I’ll be. Another Al just crawled from under a rock.

    Let’s be honest – no matter which religion you talk about there are those who will use violence and degradation as tools to further their mistaken beliefs.

    How can anyone of moderate intelligence even believe that there is that all-powerful all-seeing something that is responsible for (or would even) care for our little flypseck of a world.

  • July 24, 2007 at 1:59 am
    Ken says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yes, let’s be honest. How many acts of violence have been committed in the name of Islam over the past few years? How many for the sake of any other main stream religions?

    The fact is that the various religious writings of Islam actually call for an ongoing war against non muslims. The Jihadists are doing what Islam requires.

    Most ‘moderate’ muslims are in denial about what their faith really means. That’s why they are unable/unwilling to refute the position held by the Jihadists – they don’t have a leg to stand on.

    Btw, just because you don’t believe in things you can’t see or touch, doesn’t mean others don’t. Jihadists believe and unfortunately act on those beliefs.

  • August 30, 2007 at 7:39 am
    CAIRfreefuture says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You are absolutely right Ken!! The violence in extreme Islam FAR exceeds the violence of any other religion and those who try to claim a “moral equivalency” with other religions because of abberations like a few deranged pseudo-Christian abortion clinic bombers are being intellectually dishonest!!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*