Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Duke University Sues Insurer Over Lacrosse Controversy Claims
Southeast News December 1, 2008
Duke University has filed a lawsuit against its insurer, demanding that the company cover the costs of its settlement with three former lacrosse players who were falsely accused of rape.
The North ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Sad, Sad, Sad | Mary B. | Dec 5, 2008, 5:57 pm |
| RE: Blue Devil you know, she devil you don't know | Patrick Wissinger | Dec 4, 2008, 2:14 pm |
| RE: Sad, Sad, Sad | Patrick Wissinger | Dec 4, 2008, 2:09 pm |
| RE: Didn't the players break team rules? | Patrick Wissinger | Dec 4, 2008, 2:03 pm |
| RE: Didn't the players break team rules? | underwriter | Dec 4, 2008, 7:59 am |
| RE: Blue Devil you know, she devil you don't know | underwriter | Dec 4, 2008, 7:27 am |
| RE: Didn't the players break team rules? | Dave | Dec 4, 2008, 7:18 am |
| Didn't the players break team rules? | Mike D | Dec 3, 2008, 12:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: covered peril | Rob Rose | Dec 2, 2008, 12:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: covered peril | InsIsMyPassion | Dec 1, 2008, 3:35 pm |
| RE: RE: covered peril | cmc,jr | Dec 1, 2008, 3:25 pm |
| RE: covered peril | Jeff | Dec 1, 2008, 3:00 pm |
| covered peril | Questionable coverage | Dec 1, 2008, 1:47 pm |
| Blue Devil you know, she devil you don't know | Duke Professor | Dec 1, 2008, 1:18 pm |
| RE: RE: Sad, Sad, Sad | Dave | Dec 1, 2008, 11:46 am |
| RE: Sad, Sad, Sad | lastbat | Dec 1, 2008, 10:08 am |
| Sad, Sad, Sad | Dave | Dec 1, 2008, 9:37 am |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: Didn't the players break team rules?
Just remember, no matter how heinous the suspect may seem to our sensitivities they are still innocent until proven guilty, EVEN in a post 9/11 America.
With regards to the settlement issue, well I just wonder if Duke's legal department thought they had it handled? After all, they are DUKE! Right? Their risk management team should have been all over the policy contract to review conditions before sending in the dogs, though. It'll be interesting to see how this shakes out in the end.