Southeast News
Viewing comments for:
Florida Gov. Crist Vetoes 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill
Southeast News June 24, 2009
Siding with domestic insurers, consumer groups and the state insurance regulator, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist today vetoed a bill designed to keep State Farm from leaving and attract other large ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| Put in Wind file -- DO NOT Pay Bill, DO NOT discuss | is this ethics journalists | Jul 6, 2009, 2:57 pm |
| someone who has obviously been harmed | concerned agent | Jul 6, 2009, 1:32 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | nobody important | Jul 6, 2009, 12:29 pm |
| RE: RE: consumer protection | Jul 6, 2009, 10:28 am |
|
| "professionals" to pay attention to your industry | an amendment to your policy | Jul 6, 2009, 10:02 am |
| Your type of messages do not belong on THIS SITE. | Cherry picking | Jul 6, 2009, 9:58 am |
| RE: consumer protection | nobody important | Jul 6, 2009, 9:46 am |
| consumer protection | A increase of 44%. | Jul 6, 2009, 9:36 am |
| insurance "professionals Me thinks thou proteste | "plain language" | Jul 6, 2009, 9:23 am |
| RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I your Comments | like a good neighbor -Ethical? | Jul 6, 2009, 9:10 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | nobody important | Jul 6, 2009, 7:30 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | concerned agent | Jul 5, 2009, 1:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | Girl Scout | Jul 5, 2009, 12:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | Rocketman | Jul 5, 2009, 11:37 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | nobody important | Jul 4, 2009, 6:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | Rocketman | Jul 4, 2009, 3:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | , just you stupid. | Jul 4, 2009, 12:23 am |
| RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | nobody important | Jul 3, 2009, 8:12 pm |
| RE: RE: thick. ''I | YOUR POST? | Jul 2, 2009, 9:06 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I | WE SAY YOU | Jul 2, 2009, 9:05 pm |
| RE: RE: thick. ''I | nobody important | Jul 2, 2009, 8:38 am |
| RE: thick. ''I | Jul 2, 2009, 7:58 am |
|
| thick. ''I | Jul 2, 2009, 7:57 am |
|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | IN ALL 50 STATES | Jul 2, 2009, 7:52 am |
| Loons | nobody important | Jul 2, 2009, 7:17 am |
| NEXT PLEASE FACT: Katrina Winds were 100-200 MPH | 1 TO 4 HRS BEFORE THE WATER... | Jul 1, 2009, 9:59 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | **** | Jul 1, 2009, 9:52 pm |
| RE: RE: like a good neighbor -Ethical? | "bottom line." | Jul 1, 2009, 9:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | Paula | Jul 1, 2009, 9:19 pm |
| RE: RE: like a good neighbor -Ethical? | Jayleno rules | Jul 1, 2009, 7:28 pm |
| RE: like a good neighbor -Ethical? | The Chief Executive Officers ( | Jul 1, 2009, 7:03 pm |
| like a good neighbor -Ethical? | good hands | Jul 1, 2009, 7:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you | SORRY GUYS ITS JUST A NUMMBER | Jul 1, 2009, 6:54 pm |
| RE: ;.DINED YOU, | gary rowland | Jul 1, 2009, 6:52 pm |
| ;.DINED YOU, | this creap. | Jul 1, 2009, 6:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | LARRY | Jul 1, 2009, 6:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE 44%. | 44%. | Jul 1, 2009, 6:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | years of intentional destructi | Jul 1, 2009, 6:38 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | an increase of 44%. | Jul 1, 2009, 6:34 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for | Reality Check | Jul 1, 2009, 5:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | Rocketman | Jul 1, 2009, 5:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | Bill Payer | Jul 1, 2009, 4:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken | nobody important | Jul 1, 2009, 3:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you | Vote Crist Socialist Party | Jul 1, 2009, 2:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for | SF Agent | Jul 1, 2009, 12:12 pm |
| RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for ever | Rocketman | Jul 1, 2009, 11:59 am |
| RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi | Louisiana | Jul 1, 2009, 11:05 am |
| RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi | Houston, Texas | Jul 1, 2009, 11:04 am |
| RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi | Murfreesboro TN | Jul 1, 2009, 11:00 am |
| RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi | in virginia | Jul 1, 2009, 10:58 am |
| RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for ever | HELL AND BACK, | Jul 1, 2009, 10:46 am |
| RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi | foolish... | Jul 1, 2009, 10:42 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | Previous Claim Rep | Jul 1, 2009, 10:24 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | poor claim rep | Jun 30, 2009, 8:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for | INDEPENDENCE DAY | Jun 30, 2009, 8:22 pm |
| RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for ever | Vote Crist, Socialist Party | Jun 30, 2009, 1:18 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | SF Agent | Jun 30, 2009, 11:40 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | awarding multiple millions of | Jun 30, 2009, 11:10 am |
| RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | bad faith claims if that were | Jun 30, 2009, 11:09 am |
| RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | an increase of 44%. | Jun 30, 2009, 11:07 am |
| RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE | Kat | Jun 30, 2009, 11:06 am |
| RE: NEXT PLEASE | Rocketman | Jun 30, 2009, 10:05 am |
| SF Agents crying? | Lukiehere | Jun 30, 2009, 9:04 am |
| Cherry picking & revolution - dumb ideas | KentU | Jun 29, 2009, 11:00 pm |
| RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi | Cherry picking should be a cri | Jun 29, 2009, 10:18 pm |
| They won't be happy until they've taken you for everything | revolution | Jun 29, 2009, 10:08 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | ( BusterTPA | Jun 29, 2009, 10:07 pm |
| RE: RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | a game of chicken | Jun 29, 2009, 10:02 pm |
| RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | justthefacts | Jun 29, 2009, 5:56 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Clarifications | Jo | Jun 29, 2009, 5:52 pm |
| RE: RE: Carrier profits belong where they were made! | Inspector | Jun 29, 2009, 5:48 pm |
| RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | John | Jun 29, 2009, 5:32 pm |
| RE: Carrier profits belong where they were made! | S-F- | Jun 29, 2009, 12:54 pm |
| RE: Don't punish the little guy | DS | Jun 29, 2009, 12:53 pm |
| RE: NEXT PLEASE | DS | Jun 29, 2009, 12:47 pm |
| RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | DS | Jun 29, 2009, 12:46 pm |
| Carrier profits belong where they were made! | KentU | Jun 29, 2009, 12:44 pm |
| NEXT PLEASE | NEXT PLEASE | Jun 29, 2009, 12:43 pm |
| RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | Rocketman | Jun 29, 2009, 12:30 pm |
| RE: strong private insurer who they know a trust. | Rocketman | Jun 29, 2009, 12:17 pm |
| RE: Retirement | Rocketman | Jun 29, 2009, 12:14 pm |
| RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | TH'PE@ | Jun 29, 2009, 10:29 am |
| RE: RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | should be in prison for fraud | Jun 29, 2009, 10:27 am |
| RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | Anti-crist | Jun 29, 2009, 9:28 am |
| 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill | hoarding it's profits | Jun 29, 2009, 12:15 am |
| strong private insurer who they know a trust. | Jun 29, 2009, 12:05 am |
|
| Don't punish the little guy | Steve Oelrich | Jun 28, 2009, 9:04 pm |
| Retirement | L Weaver | Jun 28, 2009, 4:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Florida Property Insurance-Best Post Yet | Rocketman | Jun 26, 2009, 5:03 pm |
| My vision | Nostradamus | Jun 26, 2009, 3:46 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Florida Property Insurance | Enquirer | Jun 26, 2009, 3:31 pm |
| RE: RE: What's the Problem?!! | Jun 26, 2009, 3:17 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm | Jun 26, 2009, 3:11 pm |
|
| RE: Crist vs State Farm | Jun 26, 2009, 3:09 pm |
|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm | Jun 26, 2009, 3:02 pm |
|
| RE: go back and read | Jim | Jun 26, 2009, 2:57 pm |
| go back and read | caffiend | Jun 26, 2009, 2:53 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: What's the Problem?!! | Jim | Jun 26, 2009, 2:41 pm |
| RE: RE: What's the Problem?!! | Actuary | Jun 26, 2009, 2:32 pm |
| RE: What's the Problem?!! | Jim | Jun 26, 2009, 2:19 pm |
| What's the Problem?!! | Texas Agent | Jun 26, 2009, 1:04 pm |
| RE: RE: Florida Property Insurance | So Long Charlie | Jun 26, 2009, 12:35 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm | Rocketman | Jun 26, 2009, 12:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm | Thoughtful | Jun 26, 2009, 12:01 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm | Rocketman | Jun 26, 2009, 11:37 am |
| RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm | Big | Jun 26, 2009, 10:01 am |
| RE: Crist vs State Farm | Rocketman | Jun 25, 2009, 8:31 pm |
| Crist vs State Farm | scott | Jun 25, 2009, 8:11 pm |
| RE: Crist vs State Farm | Rocketman | Jun 25, 2009, 6:42 pm |
| Crist vs State Farm | Don Martin | Jun 25, 2009, 6:30 pm |
| The Circus | Rocketman | Jun 25, 2009, 6:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications | From Experience | Jun 25, 2009, 5:45 pm |
| RE: tower Hill's rating | Independent Agent loving it | Jun 25, 2009, 5:10 pm |
| RE: RE: Clarifications | Independent Agent loving it | Jun 25, 2009, 5:04 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications | Readin | Jun 25, 2009, 4:39 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications | Ins. Agt. | Jun 25, 2009, 3:58 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications | Readin | Jun 25, 2009, 3:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications | Ins. Agt. | Jun 25, 2009, 3:41 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | Skeptic | Jun 25, 2009, 3:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Clarifications | Readin | Jun 25, 2009, 3:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | Jun 25, 2009, 3:32 pm |
|
| RE: RE: Clarifications | Ins. Agt. | Jun 25, 2009, 3:28 pm |
| RE: Clarifications | Readin | Jun 25, 2009, 3:12 pm |
| Clarifications | Actuary | Jun 25, 2009, 3:05 pm |
| Its not even over yet ... | Jim | Jun 25, 2009, 2:55 pm |
| Fools and Knaves. | VOX | Jun 25, 2009, 2:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | Mr. Solvent | Jun 25, 2009, 2:13 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | Advisor | Jun 25, 2009, 2:07 pm |
| hey David... | caffiend | Jun 25, 2009, 2:04 pm |
| RE: FLORIDA continues tradition of HA HA | DJ | Jun 25, 2009, 1:47 pm |
| RE: agreed Mr. Solvent | cotyre | Jun 25, 2009, 1:45 pm |
| RE: agreed Mr. Solvent | cotyre | Jun 25, 2009, 1:45 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | Mr. Solvent | Jun 25, 2009, 1:28 pm |
| RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | Stat Guy | Jun 25, 2009, 1:25 pm |
| RE: RE: tower Hill's rating | Advisor | Jun 25, 2009, 1:19 pm |
| RE: Florida Property Insurance | Thoughtful | Jun 25, 2009, 1:17 pm |
| RE: North Light Speciality Ins Co | D | Jun 25, 2009, 1:00 pm |
| Florida Property Insurance | So Long Charlie | Jun 25, 2009, 12:43 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Unemployed | Cj | Jun 25, 2009, 12:38 pm |
| RE: RE: THANK YOU | AM | Jun 25, 2009, 12:04 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | Bill | Jun 25, 2009, 11:38 am |
| RE: tower Hill's rating | MARIA | Jun 25, 2009, 11:37 am |
| North Light Speciality Ins Co | okt0ber | Jun 25, 2009, 10:46 am |
| tower Hill's rating | Stat Guy | Jun 25, 2009, 10:12 am |
| RE: Kevie and Chuckie | The Wanderer | Jun 25, 2009, 10:11 am |
| RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | Stat Guy | Jun 25, 2009, 9:55 am |
| RE: RE: GREAT JOB Governor You have MY VOTE | Mr. Solvent | Jun 25, 2009, 9:17 am |
| RE: GREAT JOB Governor You have MY VOTE | BenDMan | Jun 25, 2009, 7:51 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | DS | Jun 25, 2009, 4:08 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | David | Jun 24, 2009, 11:25 pm |
| Oh Well | Upset | Jun 24, 2009, 10:09 pm |
| RE: Charlie is a Republician? | Nama | Jun 24, 2009, 8:55 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | DS | Jun 24, 2009, 8:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | David | Jun 24, 2009, 7:22 pm |
| RE: RE: Unemployed | Mr. Solvent | Jun 24, 2009, 6:56 pm |
| RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | DS | Jun 24, 2009, 6:27 pm |
| RE: Unemployed | William | Jun 24, 2009, 5:24 pm |
| GREAT JOB Governor You have MY VOTE | Ivan del Jesus | Jun 24, 2009, 4:19 pm |
| RE: Charlie is a Republician? | pb | Jun 24, 2009, 4:11 pm |
| RE: THANK YOU | Robert | Jun 24, 2009, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? | david | Jun 24, 2009, 4:04 pm |
| RE: Charlie is a Republician? | Eugene Perodeau | Jun 24, 2009, 3:45 pm |
| Unemployed | Oliver Twist | Jun 24, 2009, 3:22 pm |
| THANK YOU | HK | Jun 24, 2009, 3:17 pm |
| Wait and see | Ins. Agt. | Jun 24, 2009, 3:15 pm |
| Charlie is a Republician? | DS | Jun 24, 2009, 3:14 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi
State Farm is not my idea of an ideal work place. My overall experience was negative. I left for two reasons: training was poor and I dislike being forced to sell regardless of need. The rest wasn't that great either:
Pay: My pay was what I asked for. I don't know if others were paid more than I was, but I do know that I was paid more than some others. I did receive periodic raises, which was confusing as I generally had the impression that I did my job poorly.
Respect: Absoluely none, but it ran both ways. My agent consistently threw the team members under the bus when it helped him save face with an angry customer. I had no problem doing the same thing right back! He would also either give the team members a silly name or make fun of where they were from.
Benefits: None. No health insurance or life insurance, which is ironic as the company sells it! We didn't even have a retirement plan, again ironic as we sold those too. I worked for two different agents and this applied to both. I cannot say whether this is standard or just among newer agents.
Job security: Both the people I worked with and I generally felt like we were always on the razor's edge of losing our jobs. Employment at an agent's office is at the will of the agent only. Some of these guys have some serious turnover! I think that if the training was better the job security would improve. Many staff members are not properly trained and then fired for not knowing how to do their job.
Work/Life Balance: In my experience, the job is stressfully consuming. You're always worrying about performance and whether you will get fired soon. I was so stressed out that I had an impossible time leaving work at work. But depending on the agent, taking time off for illness, dental appointments and your child's school play can be extremely easy. Other agents will make you feel guilty when you leave work early because your kid was sent home from school/daycare because of vomiting and fever. As I've had both of these types of agents, I'm fairly neutral on this aspect.
Career Potential/Growth: State Farm's agency structure does not lend itself to upward mobility. You're either the agent or the team member. There are agency field offices that support the agents, but the employees there tend to be failed agents.
Location: State Farm offices are as ubiquitous as Starbucks stores. Their operations centers are rarer, but we're talking about the agencies. If you give it some time you should be able to find a location close to home.
Co-worker Competence: I'm grading this on my most recent experience, but I will say that there are some highly competent people working at State Farm. Each one should take their knowledge and experience elsewhere as they will have money and gratitude heaped upon them. But back to the not so good ones. My agent had no knowledge of a basic auto policy, and so neither did my co-workers. I heard everyone repeatedly give incorrect advice and explanations to customers. My co-workers were not licensed to sell insurance, but did anyway AND received commission. The agent's philosophy was to simply get new policies and it didn't matter what had to be done to get them. It didn't matter to him that nobody knew what they were doing as long as they sold.
Work Environment: I worked at two very different offices. The first one was uncomfortable. The agent sucked all pleasantness out of the air when he was around. He was mainly belittling and controlling, and when/if he was nice it was confusing. The second one fancied himself The Cool Boss. He seems to have a pathological need to have everyone like him so he was over the top with the chumminess sometimes. One good thing was that he was very liberal with the praise. He would then heap on the criticism, negating any nice thing he said. He was also very numbers focused. As team members were paid commission for every policy, there was a lot of sniping. There was no incentive for being fair in this office. Sell, sell, sell and do whatever you have to!
I didn't like State Farm the first time around. I didn't like it from the day I started and I was happy when I left. I didn't like being micro-managed. I didn't like being stagnant and learning nothing new. I didn't like that I would never be promoted no matter what I did because there was nowhere to go! I came back thinking maybe things would be different since I would be working for a different agent. I was wrong, unfortunately. My State Farm days are over and I couldn't be happier