Southeast News

Viewing comments for:

Florida Gov. Crist Vetoes 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill

Southeast News • June 24, 2009
Siding with domestic insurers, consumer groups and the state insurance regulator, Florida Gov. Charlie Crist today vetoed a bill designed to keep State Farm from leaving and attract other large ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi

Posted On: July 1, 2009, 11:05 am CDT
Posted By: Louisiana
Comment:
Louisiana I once worked at State Farm in Louisiana for 18 months. I had a college degree with a high gpa. I was hired on as a claim expiditer (one position below a rep). The company hired me on making $23k a year, but promised to give me the first claim rep position that came available. Three rep positions came open within a year. I was allowed to try out for two of them. I got neither position. My coworkers were mostly great and knowledgeable, but they had been there for years. From what I could tell by talking to other coworkers, the company would have strung me along forever. So, I quit and took a job somewhere else making double the money. So far as "job security" goes. SF will be happy to work you to death, and makes a big deal out of "never having a massive period of layoffs" or something to that effect. However, they will give you options like "you can move to a different state and take a huge pay cut or quit". Those are the types of choices they give you. In other words, they strive to never lay anyone off, but they will give you options that let you stay with the company...but many times those options really suck and make employees prefer to quit, so SF avoids laying off (and therefore giving unemployment benefits). However, they are telling the "truth" when they claim to rarely lay anyone off. Also, promotions do seem completely related to who you know. SF will also do whatever they can to avoid giving you a raise. One manager actually pulled my phone records for the last six months to see if I can called my home phone from work. I hadn't, which stunned him. This was a total "suprise" during the review period, but would have been an excuse to not give me a raise otherwise. Mananagement was friendly, but in typical dilbert style, they always sat together and whispered among each other at lunch, rarely bothering to speak with regular employees or reps outside of the office. ...the office was well kept, and they company did try to give us perks in whatever fashion they could. (car wash service while you're at work, oil changes while you're at work, etc, but you had to pay for all those services). Overall, I'd say SF met my expectations for a bloated corporation who will eventually be eaten alive by smaller competition. Management would hand down a new way of doing things every few months, which might work well in some states, but would make work more difficult in other states (due to varying state laws on traffic and insurance regulations).

If you can get in good with the company (esp in management), making decent money, then it might not be so bad. If you're single and work on the CATastrophe team, there is some serious money to be made. If you're married and your spouse works on the CAT team with you, even better. However, most non-CAT team personel weren't overly happy with their jobs or chances for promotion.

I don't hate SF, but I would avoid trying to work for them again.
Subject Posted By Posted On
Put in Wind file -- DO NOT Pay Bill, DO NOT discuss is this ethics journalists
Jul 6, 2009, 2:57 pm
someone who has obviously been harmed concerned agent
Jul 6, 2009, 1:32 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I nobody important
Jul 6, 2009, 12:29 pm
RE: RE: consumer protection
Jul 6, 2009, 10:28 am
"professionals" to pay attention to your industry an amendment to your policy
Jul 6, 2009, 10:02 am
Your type of messages do not belong on THIS SITE. Cherry picking
Jul 6, 2009, 9:58 am
RE: consumer protection nobody important
Jul 6, 2009, 9:46 am
consumer protection A increase of 44%.
Jul 6, 2009, 9:36 am
insurance "professionals Me thinks thou proteste "plain language"
Jul 6, 2009, 9:23 am
RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I your Comments like a good neighbor -Ethical?
Jul 6, 2009, 9:10 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I nobody important
Jul 6, 2009, 7:30 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I concerned agent
Jul 5, 2009, 1:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I Girl Scout
Jul 5, 2009, 12:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I Rocketman
Jul 5, 2009, 11:37 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I nobody important
Jul 4, 2009, 6:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE Rocketman
Jul 4, 2009, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I , just you stupid.
Jul 4, 2009, 12:23 am
RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I nobody important
Jul 3, 2009, 8:12 pm
RE: RE: thick. ''I YOUR POST?
Jul 2, 2009, 9:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: thick. ''I WE SAY YOU
Jul 2, 2009, 9:05 pm
RE: RE: thick. ''I nobody important
Jul 2, 2009, 8:38 am
RE: thick. ''I
Jul 2, 2009, 7:58 am
thick. ''I
Jul 2, 2009, 7:57 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE IN ALL 50 STATES
Jul 2, 2009, 7:52 am
Loons nobody important
Jul 2, 2009, 7:17 am
NEXT PLEASE FACT: Katrina Winds were 100-200 MPH 1 TO 4 HRS BEFORE THE WATER...
Jul 1, 2009, 9:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE ****
Jul 1, 2009, 9:52 pm
RE: RE: like a good neighbor -Ethical? "bottom line."
Jul 1, 2009, 9:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE Paula
Jul 1, 2009, 9:19 pm
RE: RE: like a good neighbor -Ethical? Jayleno rules
Jul 1, 2009, 7:28 pm
RE: like a good neighbor -Ethical? The Chief Executive Officers (
Jul 1, 2009, 7:03 pm
like a good neighbor -Ethical? good hands
Jul 1, 2009, 7:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you SORRY GUYS ITS JUST A NUMMBER
Jul 1, 2009, 6:54 pm
RE: ;.DINED YOU, gary rowland
Jul 1, 2009, 6:52 pm
;.DINED YOU, this creap.
Jul 1, 2009, 6:48 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE LARRY
Jul 1, 2009, 6:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE 44%. 44%.
Jul 1, 2009, 6:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE years of intentional destructi
Jul 1, 2009, 6:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE an increase of 44%.
Jul 1, 2009, 6:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for Reality Check
Jul 1, 2009, 5:39 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE Rocketman
Jul 1, 2009, 5:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE Bill Payer
Jul 1, 2009, 4:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken nobody important
Jul 1, 2009, 3:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you Vote Crist Socialist Party
Jul 1, 2009, 2:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for SF Agent
Jul 1, 2009, 12:12 pm
RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for ever Rocketman
Jul 1, 2009, 11:59 am
RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi Louisiana
Jul 1, 2009, 11:05 am
RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi Houston, Texas
Jul 1, 2009, 11:04 am
RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi Murfreesboro TN
Jul 1, 2009, 11:00 am
RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi in virginia
Jul 1, 2009, 10:58 am
RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for ever HELL AND BACK,
Jul 1, 2009, 10:46 am
RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi foolish...
Jul 1, 2009, 10:42 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE Previous Claim Rep
Jul 1, 2009, 10:24 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE poor claim rep
Jun 30, 2009, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for INDEPENDENCE DAY
Jun 30, 2009, 8:22 pm
RE: RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for ever Vote Crist, Socialist Party
Jun 30, 2009, 1:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE SF Agent
Jun 30, 2009, 11:40 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE awarding multiple millions of
Jun 30, 2009, 11:10 am
RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE bad faith claims if that were
Jun 30, 2009, 11:09 am
RE: RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE an increase of 44%.
Jun 30, 2009, 11:07 am
RE: RE: NEXT PLEASE Kat
Jun 30, 2009, 11:06 am
RE: NEXT PLEASE Rocketman
Jun 30, 2009, 10:05 am
SF Agents crying? Lukiehere
Jun 30, 2009, 9:04 am
Cherry picking & revolution - dumb ideas KentU
Jun 29, 2009, 11:00 pm
RE: They won't be happy until they've taken you for everythi Cherry picking should be a cri
Jun 29, 2009, 10:18 pm
They won't be happy until they've taken you for everything revolution
Jun 29, 2009, 10:08 pm
RE: RE: RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill ( BusterTPA
Jun 29, 2009, 10:07 pm
RE: RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill a game of chicken
Jun 29, 2009, 10:02 pm
RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill justthefacts
Jun 29, 2009, 5:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: Clarifications Jo
Jun 29, 2009, 5:52 pm
RE: RE: Carrier profits belong where they were made! Inspector
Jun 29, 2009, 5:48 pm
RE: RE: tower Hill's rating John
Jun 29, 2009, 5:32 pm
RE: Carrier profits belong where they were made! S-F-
Jun 29, 2009, 12:54 pm
RE: Don't punish the little guy DS
Jun 29, 2009, 12:53 pm
RE: NEXT PLEASE DS
Jun 29, 2009, 12:47 pm
RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill DS
Jun 29, 2009, 12:46 pm
Carrier profits belong where they were made! KentU
Jun 29, 2009, 12:44 pm
NEXT PLEASE NEXT PLEASE
Jun 29, 2009, 12:43 pm
RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill Rocketman
Jun 29, 2009, 12:30 pm
RE: strong private insurer who they know a trust. Rocketman
Jun 29, 2009, 12:17 pm
RE: Retirement Rocketman
Jun 29, 2009, 12:14 pm
RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill TH'PE@
Jun 29, 2009, 10:29 am
RE: RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill should be in prison for fraud
Jun 29, 2009, 10:27 am
RE: 'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill Anti-crist
Jun 29, 2009, 9:28 am
'State Farm' Insurance Rate Deregulation Bill hoarding it's profits
Jun 29, 2009, 12:15 am
strong private insurer who they know a trust.
Jun 29, 2009, 12:05 am
Don't punish the little guy Steve Oelrich
Jun 28, 2009, 9:04 pm
Retirement L Weaver
Jun 28, 2009, 4:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: Florida Property Insurance-Best Post Yet Rocketman
Jun 26, 2009, 5:03 pm
My vision Nostradamus
Jun 26, 2009, 3:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: Florida Property Insurance Enquirer
Jun 26, 2009, 3:31 pm
RE: RE: What's the Problem?!!
Jun 26, 2009, 3:17 pm
RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm
Jun 26, 2009, 3:11 pm
RE: Crist vs State Farm
Jun 26, 2009, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm
Jun 26, 2009, 3:02 pm
RE: go back and read Jim
Jun 26, 2009, 2:57 pm
go back and read caffiend
Jun 26, 2009, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: What's the Problem?!! Jim
Jun 26, 2009, 2:41 pm
RE: RE: What's the Problem?!! Actuary
Jun 26, 2009, 2:32 pm
RE: What's the Problem?!! Jim
Jun 26, 2009, 2:19 pm
What's the Problem?!! Texas Agent
Jun 26, 2009, 1:04 pm
RE: RE: Florida Property Insurance So Long Charlie
Jun 26, 2009, 12:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm Rocketman
Jun 26, 2009, 12:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm Thoughtful
Jun 26, 2009, 12:01 pm
RE: RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm Rocketman
Jun 26, 2009, 11:37 am
RE: RE: Crist vs State Farm Big
Jun 26, 2009, 10:01 am
RE: Crist vs State Farm Rocketman
Jun 25, 2009, 8:31 pm
Crist vs State Farm scott
Jun 25, 2009, 8:11 pm
RE: Crist vs State Farm Rocketman
Jun 25, 2009, 6:42 pm
Crist vs State Farm Don Martin
Jun 25, 2009, 6:30 pm
The Circus Rocketman
Jun 25, 2009, 6:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications From Experience
Jun 25, 2009, 5:45 pm
RE: tower Hill's rating Independent Agent loving it
Jun 25, 2009, 5:10 pm
RE: RE: Clarifications Independent Agent loving it
Jun 25, 2009, 5:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications Readin
Jun 25, 2009, 4:39 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications Ins. Agt.
Jun 25, 2009, 3:58 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications Readin
Jun 25, 2009, 3:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Clarifications Ins. Agt.
Jun 25, 2009, 3:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating Skeptic
Jun 25, 2009, 3:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: Clarifications Readin
Jun 25, 2009, 3:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating
Jun 25, 2009, 3:32 pm
RE: RE: Clarifications Ins. Agt.
Jun 25, 2009, 3:28 pm
RE: Clarifications Readin
Jun 25, 2009, 3:12 pm
Clarifications Actuary
Jun 25, 2009, 3:05 pm
Its not even over yet ... Jim
Jun 25, 2009, 2:55 pm
Fools and Knaves. VOX
Jun 25, 2009, 2:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating Mr. Solvent
Jun 25, 2009, 2:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating Advisor
Jun 25, 2009, 2:07 pm
hey David... caffiend
Jun 25, 2009, 2:04 pm
RE: FLORIDA continues tradition of HA HA DJ
Jun 25, 2009, 1:47 pm
RE: agreed Mr. Solvent cotyre
Jun 25, 2009, 1:45 pm
RE: agreed Mr. Solvent cotyre
Jun 25, 2009, 1:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: tower Hill's rating Mr. Solvent
Jun 25, 2009, 1:28 pm
RE: RE: tower Hill's rating Stat Guy
Jun 25, 2009, 1:25 pm
RE: RE: tower Hill's rating Advisor
Jun 25, 2009, 1:19 pm
RE: Florida Property Insurance Thoughtful
Jun 25, 2009, 1:17 pm
RE: North Light Speciality Ins Co D
Jun 25, 2009, 1:00 pm
Florida Property Insurance So Long Charlie
Jun 25, 2009, 12:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: Unemployed Cj
Jun 25, 2009, 12:38 pm
RE: RE: THANK YOU AM
Jun 25, 2009, 12:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? Bill
Jun 25, 2009, 11:38 am
RE: tower Hill's rating MARIA
Jun 25, 2009, 11:37 am
North Light Speciality Ins Co okt0ber
Jun 25, 2009, 10:46 am
tower Hill's rating Stat Guy
Jun 25, 2009, 10:12 am
RE: Kevie and Chuckie The Wanderer
Jun 25, 2009, 10:11 am
RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? Stat Guy
Jun 25, 2009, 9:55 am
RE: RE: GREAT JOB Governor You have MY VOTE Mr. Solvent
Jun 25, 2009, 9:17 am
RE: GREAT JOB Governor You have MY VOTE BenDMan
Jun 25, 2009, 7:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? DS
Jun 25, 2009, 4:08 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? David
Jun 24, 2009, 11:25 pm
Oh Well Upset
Jun 24, 2009, 10:09 pm
RE: Charlie is a Republician? Nama
Jun 24, 2009, 8:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? DS
Jun 24, 2009, 8:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? David
Jun 24, 2009, 7:22 pm
RE: RE: Unemployed Mr. Solvent
Jun 24, 2009, 6:56 pm
RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? DS
Jun 24, 2009, 6:27 pm
RE: Unemployed William
Jun 24, 2009, 5:24 pm
GREAT JOB Governor You have MY VOTE Ivan del Jesus
Jun 24, 2009, 4:19 pm
RE: Charlie is a Republician? pb
Jun 24, 2009, 4:11 pm
RE: THANK YOU Robert
Jun 24, 2009, 4:07 pm
RE: RE: Charlie is a Republician? david
Jun 24, 2009, 4:04 pm
RE: Charlie is a Republician? Eugene Perodeau
Jun 24, 2009, 3:45 pm
Unemployed Oliver Twist
Jun 24, 2009, 3:22 pm
THANK YOU HK
Jun 24, 2009, 3:17 pm
Wait and see Ins. Agt.
Jun 24, 2009, 3:15 pm
Charlie is a Republician? DS
Jun 24, 2009, 3:14 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.