West News Viewing comments for:
Two Ariz. Lawmakers Push Proposal to Ban Domestic Partner Benefits
West News • January 16, 2005
A proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriages in Arizona would outlaw all government-sponsored benefits to domestic partners.
Republican Reps. Mark Anderson and Warde Nichols said ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| hypocrits | Sean | May 29, 2005, 12:18 pm |
| RE: RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | Melissa | Jan 19, 2005, 8:46 am |
| RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | M | Jan 18, 2005, 1:17 pm |
| Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | Turquoise gecko | Jan 17, 2005, 3:12 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | Chaz | Jan 17, 2005, 2:30 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | J Allan | Jan 17, 2005, 2:26 pm |
| RE: RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | Allyssa | Jan 17, 2005, 1:42 pm |
| RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | Lori | Jan 17, 2005, 1:37 pm |
| RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | Ed | Jan 17, 2005, 1:29 pm |
| Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal | Carmen | Jan 17, 2005, 1:58 am |
| Back to article | ||
Subject: RE: Domestic Partner Benefit ban proposal
Even though the divorce rate is 53%, there are legal requirements whereby health benefits are not lost after the divorce. Citing Spears and Taylor are two bad examples.
Take a look at countries like Holland that have allowed gay marriages for a number of years. Marriage amonst hetrosexuals is down drastically, along with an increase in out of wedlock births. The evidence so far shows that gay marriage has an adverse effect on a country.
As to May's comment "This is nothing more than a power grab by legislators who want to use government to impose their personal morality on everybody in the state", it sounds like May wants to impose HIS personal morality (or lack there of) on Arizona.