West News Viewing comments for:
Court Rules Liability Waiver Invalid When There is Gross Negligence
West News July 19, 2007
The California Supreme Court has ruled that a signed liability waiver is useless in protecting a government entity from gross negligence and only good in protecting against ordinary negligence, ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Is Anyone Surprised? | Linda | Aug 14, 2007, 1:13 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Is Anyone Surprised? | steve | Jul 20, 2007, 5:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Is Anyone Surprised? | DG | Jul 20, 2007, 2:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Is Anyone Surprised? | Realist | Jul 20, 2007, 1:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Is Anyone Surprised? | Alan A. Johnson | Jul 20, 2007, 1:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Is Anyone Surprised? | Linda | Jul 20, 2007, 1:07 pm |
| Back to article | ||


Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Is Anyone Surprised?
I still can't believe Linda wants to blame the lifeguard(s) in this matter. The parents should have been at the pool and they still have the ultimate responsibility for the welfare and well being of their child. That's basic parenting 101 but many people today refuse to accept any and all personal responsibility or accountibility for their own (in)actions.
If Linda still can not figure out why this is the mother's fault let me explain, she neglected her disabled daughter at the pool and she drowned. It is really that simple.