Section Sponsor: Applied Underwriters West News

Viewing comments for:

Family Suing Mattel, Seeking Payment for Lead Testing

West News • August 22, 2007
A California family has sued Mattel Inc., claiming the world's largest toy maker should pay for testing to determine if children have been exposed to lead from millions of recalled toys. The ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!!

Posted On: August 23, 2007, 9:52 am CDT
Posted By: Happy Day
Comment:
OK, tell you what... If I knew about these things maybe I would even volunteer to help with the testing, not for pay, not for anything other than to help my fellow Americans & their children, but I am not a scientist nor do I have any medical training (I do know how to clean & dress a small wound or make an ice pack for injuries), so it would seem that I am not the most qualified to answer your questions or to do the testing (whatever that may entail.

Oh, clm mgr, if the Company had checks in place & used them to not allow defective merchandise from being purchased to begin with & testing of all products before they are marketed to the general public, there would be much fewer problems that involve litigation. Looks like Mattel might need someone new in Loss Control... just a thought...

I have no idea how much Lead is bad, butas a child I had an Antique Iron Bed with Lead paint. We all played on it, jumped on it, had slumber parties with a bunch of kids, hid under it when we played hide-n-seek & it was nothing that made any of us sick & no one died from it... but of course now that the Attorneys have become more involved in so many areas (like chickens pecking at the dirt trying to find some little scrap to chew on) who knows what is acceptable anymore since they keep changing the story on us.

I think if a manufacturer or distributor of products to the public put out something that has been deemed unsafe, then they should suffer the costs to make it right & satisfy any testing needed as a result of possibly endangering people's health or life.

Sorry if you do not agree… I figure if you sell something in a market that has safety regulations & your product is inferior with regard to its safety, pull it & learn how to check & verify the safety standards have been met before you sell it! There is a reason the safety measures are put in place & its not to get additional funds to Attorneys who represent folks that bought a product that was later recalled due to something regarding the safety of the consumer.

Mattel has been in business long enough to know the checks & balances & get it right – someone messed up – that's why they need to step up & take action now.
Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Mattel & Mary B CLR
Aug 27, 2007, 10:26 am
RE: Mattel wudchuck
Aug 26, 2007, 7:56 am
RE: RE: RE: Mattel Mary B.
Aug 24, 2007, 6:22 pm
Check this out too... CLR
Aug 24, 2007, 11:00 am
RE: RE: Mattel Stat Guy
Aug 24, 2007, 10:56 am
RE: Was waiting for this... Stat Guy
Aug 24, 2007, 10:51 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! Leadbetter
Aug 23, 2007, 6:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! Saints Fan
Aug 23, 2007, 12:43 pm
RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! lastbat
Aug 23, 2007, 12:11 pm
RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! Happy Day
Aug 23, 2007, 9:52 am
RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! clm mgr
Aug 22, 2007, 7:01 pm
RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! Tell you what
Aug 22, 2007, 6:17 pm
NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! Happy Day
Aug 22, 2007, 4:32 pm
RE: RE: Mattel wudchuck
Aug 22, 2007, 4:07 pm
RE: Mattel Mary B.
Aug 22, 2007, 4:05 pm
Mattel Linda
Aug 22, 2007, 2:39 pm
Paris, Britney and Lindsey KLS
Aug 22, 2007, 1:49 pm
RE: RE: Was waiting for this... Short Dive Up the Middle
Aug 22, 2007, 1:33 pm
RE: Was waiting for this... WooWooWoo
Aug 22, 2007, 1:17 pm
how many? wudchuck
Aug 22, 2007, 1:00 pm
Was waiting for this... Here we go
Aug 22, 2007, 1:00 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.