West News Viewing comments for:
Family Suing Mattel, Seeking Payment for Lead Testing
West News August 22, 2007
A California family has sued Mattel Inc., claiming the world's largest toy maker should pay for testing to determine if children have been exposed to lead from millions of recalled toys.
The ...
Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.
| Subject | Posted By | Posted On |
|---|---|---|
| RE: Mattel & Mary B | CLR | Aug 27, 2007, 10:26 am |
| RE: Mattel | wudchuck | Aug 26, 2007, 7:56 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Mattel | Mary B. | Aug 24, 2007, 6:22 pm |
| Check this out too... | CLR | Aug 24, 2007, 11:00 am |
| RE: RE: Mattel | Stat Guy | Aug 24, 2007, 10:56 am |
| RE: Was waiting for this... | Stat Guy | Aug 24, 2007, 10:51 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! | Leadbetter | Aug 23, 2007, 6:42 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! | Saints Fan | Aug 23, 2007, 12:43 pm |
| RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! | lastbat | Aug 23, 2007, 12:11 pm |
| RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! | Happy Day | Aug 23, 2007, 9:52 am |
| RE: RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! | clm mgr | Aug 22, 2007, 7:01 pm |
| RE: NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! | Tell you what | Aug 22, 2007, 6:17 pm |
| NO MORE TOYS FOR YOU!!! | Happy Day | Aug 22, 2007, 4:32 pm |
| RE: RE: Mattel | wudchuck | Aug 22, 2007, 4:07 pm |
| RE: Mattel | Mary B. | Aug 22, 2007, 4:05 pm |
| Mattel | Linda | Aug 22, 2007, 2:39 pm |
| Paris, Britney and Lindsey | KLS | Aug 22, 2007, 1:49 pm |
| RE: RE: Was waiting for this... | Short Dive Up the Middle | Aug 22, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| RE: Was waiting for this... | WooWooWoo | Aug 22, 2007, 1:17 pm |
| how many? | wudchuck | Aug 22, 2007, 1:00 pm |
| Was waiting for this... | Here we go | Aug 22, 2007, 1:00 pm |
| Back to article | ||



Subject: RE: Mattel & Mary B
I guess I missed out where the family was suing for big buics & money grubbing, as the article I read says they are suing for testing...
I have to agree that far to many people have something minor & most times they are the actual responsible party, but chose to go after someone with deep pockets to see if they can get a chunk for themselves, but this one didn't have an amount for the suit, but indicated it should inclue the costs of testing children...
I really don't know what all that entails, but they do have a responsibility to the public & their QC aparently did not take the proper steps to ensure the safety of the product prior to marketing it to the children, who are after all, the innocent.
Sorry you didn't read it the same as I did, but I think the company needs to be aware that they must make sure every product is safe or within the safety guidelines as set by our government, so they do not encounter great losses that tap into their otherwise large gains!
Have a super day!