Home > Talkback
Section Sponsor: Applied Underwriters West News

Viewing comments for:

Montana Supreme Court: Claims for Bodily Injury Can Cover Injured Plus Observer

West News • July 15, 2008
The Supreme Court of Montana has ruled that even a bystander's claim for bodily injuries can be covered in an insurance policy. According to court documents in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Terry ...

Insurance Journal is not responsible for the content of the message below.

Subject: RE: BI-standers injuries

Posted On: July 16, 2008, 2:25 pm CDT
Posted By: KOB
Comment:
Question is: Since the at-fault's policy limits were exhausted, does the Claimant now have a UIM claim against her own Auto Insurance Policy? Is there UIM coverage and definition of Bodily Injury clearly defined to exclude such claim?
Subject Posted By Posted On
Limts of insurance truly exhaused? Irene
Jul 21, 2008, 10:07 am
RE: Appeal to whom wudchuck? Ratemaker
Jul 17, 2008, 10:11 am
Appeal to whom wudchuck? ned
Jul 17, 2008, 7:06 am
Expected mpk
Jul 16, 2008, 3:46 pm
RE: RE: I am suffering bodily injury from reading this artic wudchuck
Jul 16, 2008, 3:11 pm
RE: RE: BI-standers injuries Claimsman
Jul 16, 2008, 2:53 pm
RE: BI-standers injuries KOB
Jul 16, 2008, 2:25 pm
BI-standers injuries James
Jul 16, 2008, 11:44 am
RE: I am suffering bodily injury from reading this article. Rusty
Jul 15, 2008, 3:07 pm
RE: I am suffering bodily injury from reading this article. SRF
Jul 15, 2008, 2:08 pm
I am suffering bodily injury from reading this article. KLS
Jul 15, 2008, 12:36 pm
Back to article

Post a Comment

.