sheltowee86 wrote:.... I've been with Farmers 18+ years and have not experienced the growth that I would like due to a lot of factors....
The one thing that holds me back is the instability of the industry. You don't know which companies are going to declare bankruptcy yet. The broker's have had an advantage for the past decade over the captive agent. However, with pending regulation this will change. And yes regulation is going to happen. Although, whether it happens or not you want to make certain that you are with a company that is most likely to stay in business. Farmers is looking pretty good compared to other companies.
Farmers does have some issues. Such as, high turnover of agents. I also think a lot of the problems you are having is directly related to what's going on in the industry. Mainly, unfair competition with companies like AIG. And believe this, that there are more like them out there just waiting to implode.
Independent agents are struggling too. Be careful.
I've posted on this discussion once already, I was with FIG, but only for 7 years, so most of what I've seen in the last 19 years is from the outside looking in.
1) On the "
Brokers advantage" and "
pending legislation you've alluded to, I don't know of any regulation that would affect the Independents ability to function as we always have, let alone impair our
advantage.
2) On the "Farmers does have some issues". Their
High Turnover is fueled by
their hiring (appointment) philosophy
and training quality - not market conditions.
3) On the 'companies like' AIG and 'unfair' competition. I work with an AIG market but fail to see anything that they have done that could be called "unfair competition". That is unless you are referring to granting underwriting rating credits, that reduce the premium, at an agents request as 'unfair competition'. If they are filed for these credits, and use them, that cannot be considered 'unfair'. This has been an industry pricing practice since L-O-N-G before I became an agent. The reason that AIG has "imploded" has more to do with their management company mis-handling their investments than the operation of their insurance subsidiaries.
This comparable to the 'Farmers Insurance Exchange', The Farmers Insurance Groups managing company. Although FIG is now wholly owned by Zurich, it does not appear that they have assumed the management of the company(ies). In fact when FIG was purchased by Zurich, they went from an A.M. Best "B" rating down to an "A" just as Foremost went down from an 'A+" to an "A" when Farmers purchased them.
In summary as an advantage of being independent vs. captive or 'encumbered' as FIG Agents is that, if an independent loses a market, as does happen from time to time, they are able to move their business to another company either as a 'Book' rollover or on a client by client basis. While I don't anticipate that FIG will be closing its doors, their agents don't have that lattitude. Additionally, as has been noted in other posts, they are not restricted by either the rates or underwriting of one company.