I have seen a CIBA quote recently that included a "Modified Replacement Cost," whereas the insured is allowed to "reduce" the building value by 25% but then receive up to 125% RC per building. This allows CIBA to write a policy with a higher rate but on a lower TIV, making them competitive. This clause appeared to remove the blanket coverage, which was a big deal for the insured. Has anyone written a policy like this? Any claims experience?
There are unsubstantiated rumors (so take it for what it's worth) that there could be issues at the next CIBA renewal in March. I've reviewed the CIBA program, and believe it has benefits, except for some of the shared limits, especially the $1 billion shared EQ limit. That could be eaten up very, very quickly by even a minor tremor.
