Features

Consumer groups say market forces, not claims, caused most recent medical malpractice crisis

April 9, 2007


A consumer coalition released a report that disputes insurers' contention that the most recent medical malpractice insurance crisis for doctors was caused by rising costs.


The study, Stable Losses/Unstable Rates 2007, by Americans for Insurance Reform (AIR), a coalition of 100 consumer groups, claims that the crisis that hit doctors was not caused by claims, payouts or legal system excesses as insurers claimed. Rather, the study of the industry's own data, found:



"This report is proof positive that the huge medical malpractice insurance rate increases between 2000 and 2003 were not related to a jump in claims," said study author J. Robert Hunter, director of insurance, Consumer Federation of America. "Rather, as in the mid-1970s and mid-1980s, they were simply the result of insurance industry economics, supplemented by insurer hype intended to divert attention away from the mismanagement by insurers that caused the crisis."


Co-author Joanne Doroshow, executive director of the Center for Justice & Democracy, said the report shows the crisis was a function of market forces. "This report shows that the real reasons medical malpractice insurance rates rose so dramatically for doctors during this decade was market forces and dropping interest rates, not because of a sudden increase in medical malpractice jury awards or payouts," Doroshow said.


She used the report to advocate for stronger regulation of the insurance industry. "State lawmakers must strengthen state insurance regulatory laws and Congress must repeal the decades-old McCarran Ferguson Act, which exempts the insurance industry from anti-trust laws," she argued.


The study can be found at:

http://insurance-reform.org

Find this article at:
http://www.insurancejournal.com/magazines/east/2007/04/09/features/79139.htm
© 2009 Wells Publishing, Inc. Reprint Information | Home Search | Contact Us