Colorado Gov. Bill Owens vetoed legislation, SB 25, that would have put in place automatic inflation adjustments for the cap on non-economic damages, according to The Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “PCI urged Gov. Owens to veto the bill which would have increased the cap on non-economic damages from $366,000 to $440,000 next year and allowed for additional increases on an annual basis,” said Michael Harrold, assistant vice president and regional manager for PCI. “The cap on non-economic damages has been very effective at keeping Colorado’s tort reform system in balance. The current system provides protection for injured individuals without the excessive damage awards experienced by other states.” In his veto letter to the Senate, Gov. Owens expressed opposition to the linkage of non-economic damages to inflation as a way to mitigate any perceived reduction in value of the award over time. “While these inflationary adjustments may seem benign, they are actually unwarranted and harmful,” Owens said. “Colorado’s cap on general non-economic damages is the centerpiece of our current civil justice system, which helps limit increases in Colorado’s litigation and insurance costs. The award of non-economic damages is designed to be a supplemental form of compassionate compensation that is not related to economic damages.”
Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- Opioid Epidemic Plagues Workers’ Comp
- Criminal Investigation Launched into Texas Fertilizer Explosion
- Karen Clark's New Program Creates Realistic Hurricane Tracks, Loss Estimates
- Tornadoes Prompt State of Emergency Declaration in Oklahoma
- On a Leash: Dog Bite Insurance Claim Trends
- 50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance Office
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- House Farm Bill Expands Crop Insurance, Cuts Food StampsMay 16, 2013 | Comments (26)
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance OfficeMay 17, 2013 | Comments (12)
- Will Supreme Court Enter Climate Change Debate?May 16, 2013 | Comments (9)
- Oregon City Employee Suing Over Co-Worker ScentMay 16, 2013 | Comments (8)
- N.Y. Regulator Issues ‘Cease and Desist’ Order to Car-Sharing Firm RelayRidesMay 16, 2013 | Comments (8)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
The Maryland Insurance Administration supported the measure, in part because the agency was receiving complaints about anti-concurrent causation clauses being used more often and in a more expansive manner.
More QuotesMaryland Insurance Administration spokesperson Vivian Laxton



Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing Companies
Medical Malpractice Payouts Not Driving Up Health Costs: Study
Florida Lawmakers Approve Medical Malpractice Reform
Industry Results Show Positive Signs for Workers’ Comp Line, NCCI’s Chief Economist Says


