The National Association of Professional Insurance Agents (PIA) has condemned an opinion by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) that some provisions of a Massachusetts insurance law would be preempted under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and therefore would not apply to national banks.
The controversy is similar to the dispute between the OCC and insurers in West Virginia over the application of the GLBA privacy laws to the insurance activities of federally chartered banks. In that suit the PIA and the IIAA are seeking to to have the OCC’s ruling overturned.
PIA Senior Vice President of Government Affairs Patricia A. Borowski stated that “As in the West Virginia case, the OCC again exceeded its statutory authority by attempting to preempt consumer protection provisions in Massachusetts law. To permit the OCC to decide whether or not such provisions will apply to banks is an over-reach of its authority and contrary to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which affirms that insurance regulation is a function of the states.”
She indicated that by seeking to assert that insurance was “nothing more than another bank product,” the OCC was incorrectly interpreting the applicable law and is attempting to “usurp state regulation of insurance and impose a two-tier regulatory system — one for banks and one for all others in the insurance business.”


Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case


