N.Y. Trial Court Dismisses Claim Under Labor Law by Injured Employee

December 27, 2005

  • December 27, 2005 at 3:44 am
    Jeff Koch says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I only have one question ? Did N.Y.State Supreme define \”Routine Maintenance\” ?? Probably not!!, and the defense attorneys have yet another obstacle in the future interpretation of this term !!! The arguments will truly continue!!!

  • January 4, 2006 at 1:04 am
    John says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It seems that we are making some progress with the legal system understanding the original intent of Labor Law 240. Clearly, if an employee of a property management company improperly sets up a ladder it should not be the property owner\’s responsibility.

  • January 4, 2006 at 6:32 am
    Judy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    This case took place in Nassau County, which happens to be a highly favorable venue for employers when it comes to Labor Law Disputes. The available jurors in Nassau include a large number of business owners, and I\’ve been told that is why the Nassau Courts have a lot of cases where labor laws have been ignored in favor of employers. I\’ve seen it happen in the past, and it will probably continue.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*