An insurance company holding a life insurance policy on a Vermont man who was shot to death — allegedly by his own son — wants a court to decide who gets the $150,000.
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. asked U.S. District Court in Rutland to determine whether the estate of Bernard Congdon gets the proceeds of the 1987 policy or Congdon’s son does.
Aaron Congdon, 17, of Chittenden, the sole beneficiary of the policy, is charged with first-degree murder in the May 5 death of the older Congdon, 53, a Select Board member found slain in the home he shared with his son.
Congdon, who is charged as an adult, has pleaded not guilty and is scheduled to go on trial in March. His lawyer is trying to have the case moved to juvenile court and says the boy was insane at the time of the killing.
The insurance company, meanwhile, is caught in the middle.
“Both Aaron Congdon and the estate of Bernard Congdon are potential adverse claimants to the proceeds from the policies,” according to the suit, filed last week by Eric Poehlmann, a Burlington lawyer representing the insurance company. “Because of these potential adverse claims, MassMutual is in doubt and cannot make a determination as to which of the claimants it may safely pay the proceeds of the policies.”
In his filing, Poehlmann said Massachusetts Mutual wants to avoid a legal fight by putting the money in escrow, with the court managing it.
“The stake in this matter is at risk for double, multiple or inconsistent claims and judgments. MassMutual should not be compelled to become involved in a dispute between the defendants over the allocation of the proceeds,” Poehlmann wrote.
Christopher Corsones, a lawyer for Bernard Congdon’s estate, could not be reached for comment on the insurance company’s petition Monday. He did not immediately return a telephone call. Barry Griffith, the boy’s court-appointed guardian ad litem in the criminal case, declined comment Monday, saying he hadn’t seen the complaint.
___
Information from: Rutland Herald, http://www.rutlandherald.com/
Brittany. says: 
stuart says: 
Calif Ex Pat says: 
Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case
